Gecarcinus nobilii Perger & Wall, 2014
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/zoosystema2019v41a7 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:65E3A0BD-2AAD-4E12-9CB0-73C974BFCE65 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3729543 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EEDE4B-FFED-FFB5-EFE9-FF4DB35FFAF4 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Gecarcinus nobilii Perger & Wall, 2014 |
status |
|
Gecarcinus nobilii Perger & Wall, 2014 View in CoL
( Fig. 2G View FIG )
Gecarcinus nobilii Perger & Wall, 2014: 97 View in CoL View Cited Treatment , fig. 3D-F.
CURRENT TAXONOMIC STATUS. — Gecarcinus nobilii Perger & Wall, 2014 View in CoL .
PARATYPE. — MNHN-IU-2014-11211 (= MNHN-B12314), 1 ♀ 36.6 × 44.3 mm Ecuador, St. Elena , Festa coll. — Original label: “ Gecarcinus Festae Nob. (cotype), St Helena, Festa, Ecuador, Nobili 1901, Muséum Paris ” .
PRESERVATION. — In alcohol.
REMARKS
Actually Nobili never published a description of Gecarcinus festae . In 1901 he described Sesarma festae and Uca festae and in the same paper referred to two specimens of Gecarcinus collected in Ecuador as Gecarcinus ruricola , a species restricted to western Atlantic islands ( Türkay 1970; Perger & Wall 2014). The abovementioned specimen, with the name of Nobili (1901) on the label, was likely collected by Enrico Festa during his 1895-1898 trip to Ecuador (Viaggio del Dr. Enrico Festa nella Republica dell’Ecuador et regioni vicine), then studied by Nobili who probably first considered it as new and dedicated to Festa as “ Gecarcinus festae ” without finally establishing it. The unpublished binomen Gecarcinus festae is a nomen nudum. The MNHN specimen examined by Nobili and selected as paratype of the new species Gecarcinus nobilii dedicated to Nobili by Perger & Wall (2014) is figured in their fig. 3D-F. The holotype is preserved in LACM.
Furthermore, Pacific Gecarcinus (Gecarcinus) lateralis quadratus sensu Türkay (1970: 338 ; see Prahl & Manjarrés 1984: 155) and Gecarcinus lateralis sensu Türkay 1987 (: 147, fig. 7) have been referred to as Gecarcinus nobilii Perger & Wall, 2014 . Note that Gecarcinus quadratus Saussure, 1853 was recently recognised as a valid species ( Toledano Carrasco & Villalobos Hiriart 2018).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Gecarcinus nobilii Perger & Wall, 2014
Ng, Ngan Kee, Rodríguez Moreno, Paula A., Naruse, Tohru, Guinot, Danièle & Mollaret, Noémy 2019 |