Cotesia ocellata, Fagan-Jeffries & Austin, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.667 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:59113117-7A31-4969-BA24-4E8E45EBF24A |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EE8792-C439-3814-D087-FEA285FE2E69 |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Cotesia ocellata |
status |
sp. nov. |
Cotesia ocellata sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:0C7082C6-35A3-4771-A141-607E6861930D
Figs 2A View Fig , 22 View Fig
Diagnosis
Cotesia ocellata sp. nov. can be separated from all other species of Cotesia currently described from Australia and Papua New Guinea primarily by the small ocelli, OOL/posterior ocellus diameter> 2.5 (and normally greater) and T1 broadening consistently posteriorly, almost wedge shaped.
Etymology
The species name is from the Latin adjective ‘ ocellatus ’, meaning ‘small eyed’ and reflecting the small size of the ocelli of this species compared to other Australian Cotesia . It is a feminine nominative singular adjective.
Material examined
Holotype
AUSTRALIA • ♀; South Australia, Cox Scrub Conservation Park ; 35.33111° S, 138.7475° E; 20 Jan.– 10 Feb. 2008; A.D. Austin leg.; M/T; BOLD: AUMIC261-18, Genbank COI: MH138653 View Materials ; SAMA 32- 44404 About SAMA . GoogleMaps
Paratypes
AUSTRALIA • 1 ♀; same collection data as for holotype but 7–28 Oct. 2007, BOLD: AUMIC504-18, Genbank COI: MH138920 View Materials ; SAMA 32-44405 About SAMA GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; South Australia, Fleurieu Peninsula, Mt Billy Conservation Park ; 35.45361° S, 138.60611° E; 25 Oct. 2000; C. Stephens leg.; M/T in bridal creeper invaded eucalypt woodland, BOLD AUMIC294-18, Genbank COI: MH138651 View Materials ; SAMA 32-44406 About SAMA GoogleMaps • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; in ethanol; BOLD AUMIC256-18, Genbank COI: MH13864; WINC GoogleMaps .
Description
Female
COLOUR. Head, antenna and mesosoma dark; all tergites and most of metasoma dark, non sclerotised areas of T1–2 and anterior sternites pale; (fore-, mid-, hind coxa) dark, dark, dark; hind tegular pale, femora (fore-, mid-, hind femur) dark lightening posteriorly, dark, dark; tibiae (fore-, mid-, hind tibia) dark, dark, dark; tegula and humeral complex dark; pterostigma dark; fore wing veins light brown to dark.
BODY LENGTH. Head to apex of metasoma: 2.1 (2.4–2.8) mm.
HEAD.Antenna approximately equal to body length; OOL/posterior ocellus diameter 2.9 (3.3–4.0); POL/ posterior ocellus diameter 2.2 (2.4–2.5); antennal flagellomere 2 length/width 3.4 (3.8–4.0); antennal flagellomere 14 length/width 2.0 (1.8–2.2).
MESOSOMA. Anteromesoscutum reticulate rugose, in holotype relatively consistent across anteromesoscutum, in paratypes much smoother in centre and lateral sides; number of pits in scutoscutellar sulcus 9 (8); scutellar disc with only shallow pits associated with setae;maximum height of mesoscutellum lunules/maximum height of lateral face of mesoscutellum 0.6 (0.7).
WINGS. Fore wing length 2.0 mm; length of veins r/2RS 0.8 (0.7–0.8); length of veins 2RS/2M 0.8 (0.9–1.0); length of veins 2M/(RS+M)b 1.8 (1.3–1.4); pterostigma length/width 2.8 (2.5–2.6).
LEGS. Hind tibia inner spur length/metabasitarsus length 0.3 (0.4). PROPODEUM. Medial carina present but indistinguishable from surrounding carina in paratypes (clearer in holotype), propodeum coarsely rugose.
METASOMA. T1 length / T1 width at posterior margin 1.0; slightly broadening posteriorly, rugose to rugulose sculpturing; T2 width at posterior margin / T2 length 2.0 (1.8–2.0), rectangular, sclerotised area well differentiated from surrounding tergite on paratype but not in holotype, some strigose or rugose sculpturing on anterior half, border with T3 not strongly indented in holotype, indented to slightly crenulate in paratypes; T2 length / T3 length 0.9 (0.8–1.1); T3 sculpture smooth and shiny; ovipositor sheaths length/hind tibial length 0.1 (0.08).
Male
Unknown.
Distribution
Currently only known from the wider Adelaide region, South Australia.
Host
Unknown.
Remarks
This species constitutes the BIN BOLD:ADL5560, and has a maximum intraspecific distance of 0.16% and a distance of 2.59% to the nearest neighbour.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |