Hypocaccus (Nessus), Reichardt, 1932
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.2478/aemnp-2018-0033 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2E9BB0E5-6412-422C-872A-60C2F4BF1D61 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5062331 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03ED7B67-FFE1-4705-FC64-FF56CD93FE1A |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Hypocaccus (Nessus) |
status |
|
Genus Hypocaccus C. Thomson, 1867 Subgenus Nessus Reichardt, 1932 View in CoL
Type species. Saprinus rubripes Erichson, 1834: 193 View in CoL , by original designation.
Diagnosis (applies to Central European taxa). Members of the subgenus Nessus differ from members of the nominotypical subgenus as well as from the subgenus Baeckmanniolus Reichardt, 1926 in generally smaller size, and in the absence of several deep elongate rugae on the frons (the pronotum is furthermore glabrous in Baeckmanniolus , while it is punctate in the other two subgenera). The frontal disc of Nessus species is adorned with dense punctation or numerous short elongate rugae (see e.g. LACKNER 2010: fig. 420). On the other hand, members of the nominotypical subgenus, as well as the subgenus Baeckmanniolus possess usually only several, often single or double deep longitudinal rugae on their frontal disc (see e.g. LACKNER 2010: fig. 436). Members of the three respective subgenera differ also in their behavior: species of Nessus are found mostly on carrion or in dung, or, in case of the newly described species, in burrows of small mammals. Members of the nominotypical subgenus, and the subgenus Baeckmanniolus on the other hand, usually occur on beaches, riverbanks or sandy shoals of streams, only occasionally are found on sandy soils further away from water (for details see also LACKNER 2010: 134, 140). Species of the genus Hypocaccus from Central Europe can be identified using the works of MAZUR (1973), MAZUR & KASZAB (1980) or KRYZHANOVSKIJ & REICHARDT (1976).
Key to the species of the subgenus Nessus View in CoL of the genus Hypocaccus View in CoL from Central Europe
1(2) Protibia on outer margin with 5–7 denticles, of which the distalmost three (or four) are triangular and conspicuously larger than the proximal rest ( Fig. 31 View Figs 31–32 ). ...................... Hypocaccus rubripes ( Erichson, 1834) View in CoL
2(1) Protibia on outer margin with 8–11 shorter denticles, of which the distalmost three (or four) are not triangular and not conspicuously larger than the proximal rest ( Fig. 32 View Figs 31–32 ).
3(6) Dorsal elytral striae reaching approximately 3/4 of the length of elytra; the first dorsal elytral stria shorter than striae 2–4 ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–2 ).
4(5) Pronotum broader, lateral sides not conspicuously convergent apically ( Fig. 14 View Figs 14–15 ); males with two faint tubercles on basal third of metaventrite, best visible in lateral view ( Fig. 15 View Figs 14–15 ); sternite VIII of male genitalia narrowing apically ( Fig. 16 View Figs 16–24 ); aedeagus shorter and stouter ( Fig. 23 View Figs 16–24 ). ... Hypocaccus hungaricus View in CoL sp. nov.
5(4) Pronotum narrowing apically ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–2 ); metaventrite in males without tubercles; sternite VIII of male genitalia sub-rectangular, apex with a brush of tiny setae ( Fig. 3 View Figs 3–11 ); aedeagus overall thinner and longer ( Fig. 10 View Figs 3–11 ). ................ Hypocaccus rufipes ( Kugelann, 1792) View in CoL
6(3) Dorsal elytral striae reaching approximately 1/2 of the length of elytra, first dorsal elytral stria slightly to conspicuously longer than striae 2–4 ( Fig. 40 View Figs 40–43 ).
7(8) Dorsum with faint bluish to greenish metallic tinge ( Fig. 40 View Figs 40–43 ); frons with very dense punctation oflen intermingled with tiny rugae; aedeagus sub-parallel, overall thinner, bluntly pointed apically ( Fig. 53 View Figs 46–54 ). .... ..................... Hypocaccus curtus ( Rosenhauer, 1847) View in CoL
8(7) Dorsum light to dark brown, without metallic tinge ( Fig. 45 View Figs 44–45 ); frons without tiny rugae, punctation of frons less dense; aedeagus shorter and stouter, acutely pointed apically ( Fig. 62 View Figs 55–63 ). ......................................... ................. Hypocaccus controversus G. Müller, 1937 View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |