Hylcalosia Fischer, 1967
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5040.2.8 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:19277C6D-F4AC-41DD-9EA9-289A185C5110 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EBD358-6255-5763-FF2E-F9D80DF7E50A |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Hylcalosia Fischer |
| status |
|
Key to species in the genus Hylcalosia Fischer View in CoL View at ENA
Yao et al. (2020) and Zhu et al. (2018) provide the most recent dichotomous keys to the Palaearctic species of Hylcalosia . The dichotomous key with all known species presented here is a modification of those keys.
1 Notauli absent in posterior half of mesoscutum; T2 much longer than T3......................................... 2
- Notauli present in posterior half of mesoscutum (but sometimes shallow) and fused with mid pit; T2 almost as long as T3 (T2 0.83 × longer than T 3 in H. yongjingzengi Yao n. sp.)....................................................... 10
2 Vein 1cu-a of fore wing interstitial; notauli present only in anterior third of mesoscutum; metanotum without mid-longitudinal carina................................................................... H. sutchanica Belokobylskij, 1992 View in CoL
- Vein 1cu-a of fore wing antefurcal or postfurcal; notauli present in anterior half of mesoscutum; metanotum with high midlongitudinal carina.................................................................................... 3
3 Propodeum almost entirely with dense irregular and rough cellular sculpture; eye with sparse and short setae............ 4
- Propodeum slightly wrinkled, without cellular sculpture; eye glabrous........................................... 5
4 Body black to blackish brown; ovipositor sheath 0.8 × as long as fore wing, ovipositor 1.8 × longer than metasoma; T1 1.1 × longer than apical width............................................................ H. perkna Yao et al., 2020
- Body brownish yellow to reddish brown; ovipositor sheath 0.4–0.5 × as long as fore wing, ovipositor as long as metasoma, rarely up to 1.2 × longer than metasoma; T1 0.9–1.0 × longer than apical width.......... H. hymaenei Belokobylskij, 1992 View in CoL
5 Length of eye more 2.0 × longer than temple in dorsal view; areola of propodeum present posteriorly; body mainly yellowish to yellowish brown.............................................................. H. carinata Zhu et al., 2018
- Length of eye 1.2–1.9 × longer than temple in dorsal view; areola of propodeum absent; body mainly reddish brown to black ................................................................................................... 6
6 Scutellar sulcus with five carinae; mid pit short, restricted to posterior quarter of mesoscutum......................... 7
- Scutellar sulcus with one or three carinae; mid pit long, present in posterior half of mesoscutum....................... 8
7 Length of eye 1.6 × longer than temple in dorsal view; vein 1cu-a of fore wing postfurcal; vein m-cu of hind wing slightly postfurcal; T2 1.4 × longer than T3............................................... H. dichromata Yao et al., 2020
- Length of eye 1.2 × longer than temple in dorsal view; vein 1cu-a of fore wing weakly antefurcal; vein m-cu of hind wing weakly antefurcal; T2 1.07 × longer than T3...................................... H. poricrenulata Zhu et al., 2018
8 Precoxal sulcus nearly complete; vein m-cu of hind wing interstitial; T2–T3 frequently with wide and shallow mid-longitudinal groove.................................................................... H. ventisulcata Zheng et al., 2012
- Precoxal sulcus incomplete; vein m-cu of hind wing antefurcal or postfurcal; T2–T3 without mid-longitudinal groove, rarely only with narrow smooth stripe.......................................................................... 9
9 Length of eye 1.4 × longer than temple in dorsal view; vein m-cu of hind wing obviously antefurcal; body mainly reddishbrown........................................................................... H. leura Yao et al., 2020
- Length of eye 1.7 × longer than temple in dorsal view; vein m-cu of hind wing weakly postfurcal; body mainly black.................................................................................. H. melasaraia Zhu et al., 2018
10 Length of eye 1.5–2.2 × longer than temple in dorsal view; T1 and T2 mainly yellowish............................ 11
- Length of eye 0.7–1.1 × longer than temple in dorsal view; T1 and T2 black or dark reddish brown, sometimes mainly brown (except H. laosensis Fischer View in CoL )........................................................................... 14
11 Notauli complete; ovipositor sheath about as long as metasoma...................... H. hemiflava van Achterberg, 1983 View in CoL
- Notauli reduced posteriorly; ovipositor sheath much longer than metasoma...................................... 12
12 Length of eye 1.5 × longer than temple in dorsal view; vein m-cu of hind wing interstitial; vein r-m of fore wing vertical................................................................................. H. verticalis Zhu et al., 2018
- Length of eye 1.8–2.2 × longer than temple in dorsal view; vein m-cu of hind wing antefurcal or weakly postfurcal; vein r-m of fore wing oblique (inclivous)........................................................................... 13
13 Notauli reaching almost posterior part of mid pit, widely crenulated; precoxal sulcus wide and short, widened in middle, present in anterior 2/3 of mesopleuron.................................................. H. eurykephale Yao et al., 2020
- Notauli reaching anterior third of mid pit, finely crenulated; precoxal sulcus slender, narrow in middle, present in anterior 3/4 of mesopleuron................................................................. H. bothynis Yao et al., 2020
14 Length of eye 0.7–0.8 × longer than temple in dorsal view; median length of T2 subequal to its maximum width......... 15
- Length of eye about as long as temple in dorsal view; median length of T2 distinctly less than its maximum width....... 16
15 Distal upper lobe of mandible consists of two narrow and short teeth; mid pit distinctly longer than half of mesoscutum; T1–T3 longitudinally striate and T1 1.5 × longer than its apical width............................. H. ruficeps Cameron, 1910
- Distal upper lobe of mandible consists of single, wide and long lobe; mid pit shorter than half-length of mesoscutum; T1–T3 reticulate-striate and T1 shorter than its apical width.................................. H. complexa Chen & Wu, 1994 View in CoL
16 Vein 2RS of fore wing curved in “S” shape; apical segments of metasoma protruding beyond T3 slightly................................................................................................ H. laosensis Fischer, 2008 View in CoL
- Vein 2RS of fore wing weakly curved, almost straight; apical segments of metasoma not protruding beyond T3.......... 17
17 Precoxal sulcus incomplete and irregularly rugose; vein 1m-cu of fore wing interstitial; scutellar sulcus with six carinae.................................................................................. H. yongjingzengi Yao n. sp.
- Precoxal sulcus complete and entirely crenulated; vein 1m-cu of fore wing postfurcal; scutellar sulcus not so........... 18
18 Propodeum smooth basally; vein 1m-cu of fore wing distinctly postfurcal; length of eye almost equal to temple in dorsal view.......................................................................... H. maetoi van Achterberg, 1983 View in CoL
- Propodeum entirely coarsely and densely rugose-areolate, weakly sculptured basally; vein 1m-cu of fore wing weakly postfurcal; length of eye 1.1 × longer than temple in dorsal view............................. H. livadiae Belokobylskij, 2015
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.