Tomoglossa decora ( Casey, 1910 ) Gusarov, 2002
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4619813 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4619831 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EB87A5-FFC8-C102-FE8A-FC60AA43FB25 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tomoglossa decora ( Casey, 1910 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
1. Tomoglossa decora ( Casey, 1910) View in CoL , comb. nov. ( Figs. 128 View FIGURES 112 View FIGURES 1320 View FIGURES 2128 , 31 View FIGURES 29 33 )
Noverota decora Casey, 1910: 91. View in CoL
Type material: Lectotype (here designated),, UNITED STATES: “Miss[issippi].” [Vicksburg], “ decora Csy. ”, “Casey bequest 1925”, “ TYPE USNM 39100” (red label), “ Lectotype Noverota decora Casey. V.I.Gusarov des. 2002” (red label) (NMNH). While describing N. decora , Casey did not specifically state how many specimens were available.
Additional material: UNITED STATES: Vermont:, Windsor Co., 8 km SEE Springfield, Hwy. I91, 43º14.00'N 72º26.81'W, 250m, in forest litter, Acer , Betula , Tsuga , Quercus , 21.ix.1998 (V.I.Gusarov) (DESPU); Pennsylvania:, Easton, 5.x.1917 (J.W.Green) (CAS);, ditto but 24.viii.1917 (CAS); Arkansas:, Garland Co., 28.6 km NWW Hot Springs, Ouachita National Forest, Lake Ouachita, CR127, 34º36.67'N 93º20.75'W, 300m, in forest litter, Quercus , 19.iii.2000 (V.I.Gusarov) (DESPU).
Diagnosis. Tomoglossa decora is close to the Palaearctic T. luteicornis but has lighter coloration and different shape of the aedeagus and spermatheca ( Figs. 2126 View FIGURES 21 28 in this paper and Lohse 1989: Fig. 123). Tomoglossa decora differs from T. ornatella and T. improvisa in having quadrate antennal articles 45 ( Figs. 2931 View FIGURES 29 33 ), from T. arizonica and T. floridana in having quadrate antennal articles 45, less transverse articles 610 ( Figs. 3133 View FIGURES 29 33 ) and longer body. In comparison to T. floridana and T. ornatella , T. decora has thinner spermatheca with different shape of umbiculus ( Figs. 26 View FIGURES 21 28 , 36 View FIGURES 34 37 , 45 View FIGURES 43 46 ). In T. decora the female accessory sclerite is smaller than in T. ornatella , but larger than in T. floridana ( Figs. 28 View FIGURES 21 28 , 37 View FIGURES 34 37 , 46 View FIGURES 43 46 ). Tomoglossa decora also differs from T. arizonica in having longer apex of the median lobe of aedeagus (in lateral view) ( Figs. 21 View FIGURES 21 28 , 40 View FIGURES 38 42 ).
Description. Length 2.0 2.1 mm. Head and elytra dark brown; elytra and antennal articles 211 and article 3 of maxillar palpus brown; pronotum reddish brown; abdominal segments IIIV and VIIVIII reddish yellow; apical third of elytra, legs, mouthparts and antennal article 1 yellow.
Head transverse, surface on disk glossy, without visible (at x100) microsculpture, with strong punctures, distance between them equal to their diameter. Antennal article 2 longer than 3, 45 quadrate, 510 slightly transverse, last article as long as 9 and 10 combined.
Pronotum transverse, width to length ratio 0.41 mm: 0.33 mm (average for 5 specimens), wider than head (pronotum width to head width ratio 0.41 mm: 0.35 mm); surface glossy, without visible microsculpture, with finer puncturation than on head, distance between punctures equals ½1 their diameter. Elytra measured from humeral angle shorter than wide (0.43 mm: 0.48 mm), glossy, without microsculpture and with puncturation as on pronotum.
Abdominal terga glossy, without microsculpture, and with fine and sparse puncturation, puncturation becoming finer towards abdominal apex, on terga IIIV distance between punctures within rows equal to their diameter and between rows 23 times their diameter, on tergum VI distance between punctures within rows equal to 12 times their diameter and between rows 34 times their diameter, on tergum VII distance between punctures equal to 35 times their diameter. Tergum VII with white edge.
Median lobe of aedeagus with narrow apex ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 21 28 ). Internal sac with a deeply concave sclerite ( Figs. 2324 View FIGURES 21 28 ). Copulatory piece without apical process ( Figs. 23, 25 View FIGURES 21 28 ).
Spermatheca with wide umbilicus ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 21 28 ).
Distribution. Known from Eastern United States (Vermont, Pennsylvania, Arkansas, Mississippi) ( Fig. 47 View FIGURE 47 ).
Natural History. Casey (1910) did not provide habitat information. I collected two specimens by sifting forest litter. Interestingly, the Palaearctic species of Tomoglossa for which ecological information is available inhabit various kinds of wetlands, including salt marshes.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Tomoglossa decora ( Casey, 1910 )
Gusarov, Vladimir I. 2002 |
Noverota decora
Casey 2002: 91 |