Phareicranaus hermosa
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.207840 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6186009 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EB8794-FF95-FFCB-FF08-FBFE0016B9E9 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Phareicranaus hermosa |
status |
|
Phareicranaus hermosa View in CoL (Pinto-da-Rocha & Kury, 2003) comb. n.
( Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 A, B)
Santinezia hermosa Pinto-da-Rocha & Kury, 2003: 186, figs. 13–18 (male holotype, “ Peru, Loreto, Alto rio Samiria, MUSM”, not examined).
Diagnosis. See Pinto-da-Rocha & Kury (2003: 186). Live specimens in Fig. 13 View FIGURE 13 (A = male, B = female). Remark. Males collected in the same locality on the same day show incredible variation in the size of the ventral spur on coxa IV, from tubercle-sized, as wide as long, to being five times longer than basal width. Material examined. Ecuador. Napo, Archidona Rio Holin (Sacha Wagra Lodge), 0°57’S, 77°41”W, elevation 752m, 5 males, 5 females (MZSP).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Phareicranaus hermosa
Pinto-Da-Rocha, Ricardo & Bonaldo, Alexandre B. 2011 |
Santinezia hermosa
Kury 2003: 186 |