Scinax Wagler, 1830
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4104.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D598E724-C9E4-4BBA-B25D-511300A47B1D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5458524 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03EA87A5-FFB2-1235-F398-8903319AF2AB |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Scinax Wagler, 1830 |
status |
|
Scinax Wagler, 1830 View in CoL
Scinax Wagler, 1830:201 View in CoL . Type species: Hyla aurata Wied, 1821 View in CoL , by subsequent designation ( Stejneger, 1907:76). Garbeana Miranda-Ribeiro, 1926:95. Type species: Garbeana garbei View in CoL by monotypy.
Definition. Small to medium-sized frogs with slightly truncate discs on fingers and toes, webbing reduced between fingers and absent between Fingers I and II ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10. A D); venter immaculate; eggs deposited in ponds.
Content. Sixty-three species: Scinax acuminatus (Cope) View in CoL , altae* (Dunn), alter* (Lutz), baumgardneri* (Rivero), blairi* (Fouquette & Pyburn), boesemani (Goin) View in CoL , boulengeri (Cope) View in CoL , cabralensis* Drummon, Baêta & Pires, caldarum* (Lutz), camposseabrai* (Bokermann), cardosoi View in CoL * (Carvalho-e-Silva & Peixoto), castroviejoi* De la Riva, chiquitanus (De la Riva) View in CoL , constrictus* Lima, Bantos & Giaretta, cretatus* Nunes & Pombal, crospedospilus (Lutz) View in CoL , cruentommus (Duellman) View in CoL , curicica* Pugliese, Pombal & Sazima, cuspidatus* (Lutz), danae* (Duellman),? dolloi* Werner, duartei (Lutz) View in CoL , elaeochrous (Cope) View in CoL , eurydice* (Bokermann), exiguus* (Duellman), funereus (Cope) View in CoL , fuscomarginatus (Lutz) View in CoL , fuscovarius (Lutz) View in CoL , garbei (Miranda-Ribeiro) View in CoL , granulatus* (Peters), hayii (Barbour) View in CoL , ictericus Duellman & Wiens View in CoL , imbegue* Nunes, Kwet & Pombal, iquitorum* Moravec, Tuanama, Pérez-Peña & Lehr, jolyi Lescure & Marty View in CoL , juncae* Nunes & Pombal, karenanneae* (Pyburn), kennedyi* (Pyburn), lindsayi * Pyburn,? madeirae * (Bokermann), manriquei* Barrio-Amorós, Orellana & Chacón-Ortiz, maracaya* (Cardoso & Sazima), nasicus (Cope) View in CoL , nebulosus (Spix) View in CoL , oreites Duellman and Wiens View in CoL , pachycrus * (Miranda-Ribeiro), pedromedinae (Henle) View in CoL , perereca* Pombal, Haddad & Kasahara, proboscideus (Brongersma) View in CoL , quinquefasciatus (Fowler) View in CoL , rogerioi* Pugliese, Baêta & Pombal, rostratus (Peters) View in CoL , ruber (Laurenti) View in CoL , sateremawe* Stauro & Peloso, similis (Cochran) View in CoL , squalirostris (Lutz) View in CoL , staufferi (Cope) View in CoL , sugillatus (Duellman) View in CoL , tigrinus View in CoL * Nunes, Carvalho & Pereira, tymbamirim* Nunes, Kwet & Pombal, villasboasi* Brusquetti, Jansen, Barrio-Amorós, Segalla & Haddad, wandae* (Pyburn & Fouquette), and x-signatus (Spix) View in CoL .
Distribution. Tropical Mexico through Central America to extreme northern Peru west of the Andes; east of the Andes through South America southward to Uruguay and northern Argentina, including Tobago, Trinidad, and Saint Lucia in the Lesser Antilles.
Etymology. The generic name is derived from the Greek skinos meaning quick or nimble, an appropriate name for these agile frogs. The gender is masculine.
Remarks. See preceding Remarks in the account of Ololygon . Only 28 of the 64 species of Scinax (44%) are included in our analysis of DNA sequences ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ). The clade recognized herein as Scinax is well supported (94%). Within Scinax , one clade with only 71% support contains eight species of the S. rostratus Group ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10. A E), originally defined by Duellman (1972a). Many of the other poorly supported clades in Scinax contain Cis-Andean and eastern Brazilian species. Structurally S. pedromedinae ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10. A F) is like members of the S. rostratus Group, but in our tree ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ) it is not within that group. Many named taxa are known only from the type localities, whereas the widespread S. ruber certainly is a composite of several species as evidenced by differences in color patterns, webbing, and calls ( Duellman, 2005).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.