Anopsicus ana Huber, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2020.718.1101 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F9E9A91E-488C-4DB1-9361-E788E9AC5BC1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4343805 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/283F2FD5-A9CA-4D33-B061-5F0EE48AABAF |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:283F2FD5-A9CA-4D33-B061-5F0EE48AABAF |
treatment provided by |
Valdenar |
scientific name |
Anopsicus ana Huber |
status |
sp. nov. |
Anopsicus ana Huber View in CoL sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:283F2FD5-A9CA-4D33-B061-5F0EE48AABAF
Figs 1–2 View Figs 1–4 , 5–12 View Figs 5–9 View Figs 10–13 , 14–16 View Figs 14–19 , 1025, 1033
Diagnosis
Distinguished from known congeners by combination of body size (total body length ~1.0); procursus shape ( Figs 7–8 View Figs 5–9 ; weakly sclerotized flat sclerite, wide in lateral view, narrow in dorsal view); processes of genital bulb ( Fig. 9 View Figs 5–9 ; straight apophysis accompanied by membranous process); armature of male chelicerae ( Figs 10–11 View Figs 10–13 ; pair of frontal processes pointing downwards); epigynum ( Figs 14–15 View Figs 14–19 ; only posterior margin sclerotized, sclerotized area wider laterally than medially); and internal female genitalia ( Figs 12 View Figs 10–13 , 16 View Figs 14–19 ; pore plates in vertical position on tent-like sclerite).
Etymology
The species name refers to the type locality; noun in apposition.
Type material
VENEZUELA – Falcón • ♂ holotype, ZFMK (Ar 21812), Península de Paraguaná , Cerro Santa Ana (11.8141° N, 69.9478° W), 380 m a.s.l., 17 Nov. 2018 (B.A. Huber, O. Villarreal M.) GoogleMaps .
Other material examined
VENEZUELA – Falcón • 4 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀, ZFMK (Ar 21813), and 2 ♀♀ in pure ethanol, ZFMK (Ven18- 190), same collection data as for holotype GoogleMaps • 3 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀, ZFMK (Ar 21814), and 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀ in pure ethanol, ZFMK (Ven18-188), Península de Paraguaná , Cerro Santa Ana (11.8202° N, 69.9447° W), 530 m a.s.l., 17 Nov. 2018 (B.A. Huber, O. Villarreal M.) GoogleMaps • 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀, ZFMK (Ar 21815), and 5 ♀♀ in pure ethanol, ZFMK (Ven18-178), Península de Paraguaná , Cueva del Guano (11.9000° N, 69.9479° W), 140 m a.s.l., 16 Nov. 2018 (B.A. Huber, O. Villarreal M.) GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype)
MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 1.05, carapace width 0.45. Distance PME–PME 40 µm; diameter PME 30 µm; distance PME–ALE 15 µm; AME absent. Leg 1: 2.55 (0.65+0.15 + 0.70 +0.70 +0.35), tibia 2: 0.45, tibia 3: 0.40, tibia 4: 0.60; tibia 1 L/d: 12.
COLOR (in ethanol). Prosoma and legs ochre-yellow, ocular area and clypeus barely darker, carapace with very indistinct radial marks and internal posterior dark mark; legs ochre yellow, without dark rings; abdomen pale bluish gray with small darker bluish mark in gonopore area.
BODY. Habitus as in Fig. 1 View Figs 1–4 . Ocular area not raised. Carapace with very shallow, almost non-existent thoracic groove. Clypeus unmodified. Sternum barely wider than long (0.32/0.30). Abdomen globular.
CHELICERAE. As in Figs 10–11 View Figs 10–13 , with pair of simple pointed frontal processes directed downwards; without modified hairs and stridulatory ridges.
PALPS. As in Figs 5–6 View Figs 5–9 ; coxa with retrolateral apophysis, trochanter barely modified, femur proximally with large retrolateral process, distally with short ventral process directed towards distal (asterisk in Fig. 8 View Figs 5–9 ); procursus ( Figs 7–8 View Figs 5–9 ) weakly sclerotized flat sclerite, wide in lateral view, narrow in dorsal view, with small cuticular spines on retrolateral side, distally with two points directed towards ventral; genital bulb ( Fig. 9 View Figs 5–9 ) distally with straight apophysis accompanied by membranous process (the latter presumably carrying the sperm duct).
LEGS. Without spines and curved hairs; few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium of tibia 1 at 53%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1; femur 3 not thickened; tarsus 1 with ~7 pseudosegments, difficult to see in light microscope.
Male (variation)
Tibia 1 in nine males (incl. holotype): 0.65–0.85 (mean 0.73); the two males from the cave (Cueva del Guano) have the longest legs (0.80, 0.85); all other males range from 0.65–0.75. Eyes and coloration do not seem to differ between epigean and hypogean males.
Female
In general similar to male ( Fig. 2 View Figs 1–4 ). Tibia 1 in eight females: 0.70–1.05 (mean 0.81); the two females from the cave have the longest legs (0.90, 1.05); all other females range from 0.70–0.85. Without stridulatory apparatus between prosoma and abdomen. Epigynum ( Fig. 14 View Figs 14–19 ) simple flat plate, only posterior margin sclerotized, sclerotized area wider laterally than medially; internal structures partly visible through cuticle (often bluish or greenish). Most females with genital plug and epigynal plate tilted up to more or less vertical position. Internal genitalia ( Figs 12 View Figs 10–13 , 15–16 View Figs 14–19 ) with pore plates in vertical position on tent-like sclerite.
Distribution
Known from two neighboring localities on the Paraguaná peninsula in the Venezuelan state Falcón (Fig. 1033).
Natural history
At Cerro Santa Ana the spiders were found in the leaf litter, sitting or running directly on the undersides of dead leaves; no webs were seen. They seemed to prefer the higher and more humid areas of the mountain [where they occurred very close to Pisaboa marcuzzii ( Caporiacco, 1955) comb. nov.]. They were not found in the dryer and lower parts, where the corresponding microhabitat was occupied by Galapa spiniphila Huber sp. nov. and Modisimus culicinus (Simon, 1893) .
In the cave Cueva del Guano, the spiders were found on the undersides of small rocks in the twilight area; Chisosa caquetio Huber, 2019 occurred in the same place but was found in dead bromeliads on the ground that had fallen into the entrance area of the cave; no pholcids were found in the very hot, humid, and entirely dark deeper parts of the cave, where abundant ticks of the genus Antricola Cooley & Kohls, 1942 were found covering much of the floor of the gallery (see Peck 1982 for a short description of the cave).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.