Tennysonia stellata Busk, 1867
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.207778 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6183346 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E88654-FFD7-142A-FF67-A81FFA3FFE9E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tennysonia stellata Busk, 1867 |
status |
|
Tennysonia stellata Busk, 1867 View in CoL
( Figs 1–4 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 )
Tennysonia stellata Busk, 1867: 242 View in CoL , pl. 36, figs 10, 11; Busk 1875: 34, pl. 31, fig. 6.
Material examined. NHMUK 75.5.29.63, fragment mounted on slide, Natal, Col. Bolten; this is a part of the specimen constituting the lower two of three drawings of Busk (1875, pl. 31, fig. 6), although the drawing is a mirror image of the original. NHMUK 99.7.1.5604, fragment mounted on slide, Natal, Colonel Bolten, Busk Collection (British Museum Catalogue). NHMUK 99.7.1.518, fragment mounted on slide, Natal, Col. Bolten, Busk Collection. NHMUK 99.5.1.1374, fragment mounted on slide, Port Elizabeth, Hincks Collection. NHMUK 99.5.1.1452, fragment mounted on slide, Port Phillip H. [presumably Port Phillip Heads, Australia, and mislabelled], Hincks Collection. NHMUK 34.10.20.4, fragment mounted on slide, Port Elizabeth, Vine Collection. NHMUK 1963.3.30.106, three fragments mounted on slide, Port Elizabeth, A.W. Thompson ex Jelly Collection. NHMUK 72.7.12.1, S.E. Cape Colony, Burrows Collection. NHMUK 72.7.30.12, two colonies, Port Natal, Burrows Collection. NHMUK 88.1.1.2, two colonies, Port Elizabeth, Burrows Collection. NHMUK 1968.1.16.107, shelly beach, East London, University of Cape Town Ecological Survey, 6 July 1937. NHMUK 72.8.6.5, three colonies, Natal. 72.8.6.5, three colonies, Natal, Colonel Bolden. NHMUK 2003.10.27.7, several branch fragments, registered together with another cyclostome species, Groot Bank, Plettenberg Bay, South Africa, 34°00.46’ S, 23°29.79’ E, 30 metres, 23 March 2000, Coral Reef Research Foundation. NHMUK 2003.10.27.13, Groot Bank, Plettenberg Bay, South Africa, 34°00.46’ S, 23°29.79’ E, 16 metres, 22 March 2000, Coral Reef Research Foundation. SAM A28765 View Materials , two branched fragments of narrow colony, RIY Bank, Port Elizabeth, South Africa, 33°58.15’ S, 25°52.01’ E, 23 metres, 18 October 2009, Iziko Museums Bryozoan Collection. SAM A28766 View Materials , one broad colony, RIY Bank, Port Elizabeth, South Africa, 33°58.15’ S, 25°52.01’ E, 23 metres, 18 October 2009, Iziko Museums Bryozoan Collection.
Distribution. Previously recorded from Cape Town (i.e. Cape of Good Hope), Plettenberg Bay, Port Elizabeth, East London and extending eastwards into Kwazulu Natal.
Description. Colony erect, ramifying, comprising branches of rounded subtriangular cross-section. Branch bifurcation angle approximately 45–90°, torsion of branches between bifurcations varying from minor, resulting in almost planar colonies, to moderate, resulting in more three-dimensional colonies. Anastomoses frequently in planar colonies, present but less common in three-dimensional colonies. Branches typically reflexed, the dorsal side concave in profile, varying in width from about 1.3 to 2.7 mm, delayed separation of branches after division of frontal midlines sometimes producing broader, flabellate sheets. Zooids opening on the two frontolateral branch surfaces; apertures of autozooids usually connate, arranged in transverse series of 5–9 autozooids per series, those on opposite frontolateral sides alternating along crest at branch midline, diameter typically showing a slight gradient of increase towards branch midline; spacing between connate series a little greater than autozooidal aperture diameter, occupied by kenozooids. Branch dorsal (reverse) surface formed of pseudoporous exterior wall, slightly convex, smooth apart from arcuate growth bands, traces of interzooidal walls visible through exterior wall under an optical microscope, defining long, narrow proximal parts of newly budded zooids. Overgrowths irregularly developed on branch dorsal surfaces, particularly in basal parts of colonies, comprising kenozooids either with or without calcified exterior walls. Transversely fractured branches reveal small, new buds only along exterior wall of dorsal branch surface. Ancestrula and early astogeny unknown, proximal parts of all available colonies either broken-off or obscured by kenozooidal overgrowths.
Autozooids free-walled or fixed-walled. Apertures polygonal in free-walled autozooids, 0.15–0.27 mm in diameter, subcircular to longitudinally elliptical in fixed-walled autozooids, 0.13–0.17 mm in diameter. Peristomes absent in free-walled autozooids, very short and collar-like in fixed-walled autozooids. Apertural spines comprising thickened, pustulose patches of interior wall around rims of some autozooidal apertures, commoner at wall triple junctions. Exterior-wall calcification closing some autozooidal apertures, particularly to dorsal surface of Kenozooids smaller and more irregularly polygonal in shape than autozooids, either free-walled throughout colony or becoming fixed-walled a variable distance proximally of branch growing tips, generally arranged in 1–3 ill-defined rows between autozooidal apertures.
Gonozooids infrequent (only two examples observed), opening frontally, brood chamber ovoidal in outline, extending across both frontolateral branch surfaces, incorporating 2–3 series of autozooids, some of which protrude through roof as single, pairs or triplets of apertures. Roof formed of exterior wall with denser and larger pseudopores than elsewhere. Ooeciopore not identified, either destroyed by breakage of roof or indistinguishable from autozooidal apertures.
Interior walls with fabric of transverse fibres near wall growing edges. Interzooidal pores numerous, partly closed by numerous centripetal spines extending into pore lumens, <10 µm in diameter. Pseudopores subcircular, some with iris-like partial closure formed by a small number of basally coalesced centripetal spines, <10 µm in diameter.
Remarks. This species was said by Busk to have a pale rose tint and be parasitic on Onchopora tubulosa , although our fresh material from Port Elizabeth is yellow in colour. The material described by Busk came from the Cape of Good Hope and was supplied by ‘Dr. Rubidge (Mrs. Gatty)’. Busk (1867) regarded the species to be most closely related to Discoporella Gray and assigned it provisionally to the family Diastoporidae Busk, 1859 . However, in 1875 he transferred it ‘doubtfully’ to his new family Discoporellidae, adding that it ‘should probably be regarded as a Heteropora’ [ Heteropora Blainville, 1830 is a genus nowadays assigned to the suborder Cerioporina , see Nye 1975]. Notably, Busk (1875) described Diastoporidae as having ‘no cancelli’ but Discoporellidae as having a ‘cancellated or porous’ surface.
Curiously, Busk’s text (1867, p. 242) failed to associate a species name with his new genus Tennysonia , although the trivial name stellata is specified in the plate description.
None of the NHMUK specimens correspond with the colonies depicted by Busk (1867) or match the locality (Cape of Good Hope) or habitat and collection details stated by Busk (1867, p. 242): ‘parasitic upon Onchopora tubulosa . Dr. Rubidge (Mrs. Gatty)’. The whereabouts of Busk’s syntypes, if they still exist, are therefore unknown.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Tennysonia stellata Busk, 1867
Taylor, Paul D., Waeschenbach, Andrea & Florence, Wayne K. 2011 |
Tennysonia stellata
Busk 1875: 34 |
Busk 1867: 242 |