Grigoriora cheni ( Bey-Bienko, 1955 ) Wang & Liu, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4441.2.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3E7E5769-1B7D-4A32-9EDC-EEF62E99F676 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5986835 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E7AE27-FFBE-FFC4-15C3-F8CB386DFCEA |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Grigoriora cheni ( Bey-Bienko, 1955 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Grigoriora cheni ( Bey-Bienko, 1955) View in CoL comb. nov.
( Figs. 8–10 View FIGURES 8–10 )
http://lsid.speciesfile.org/urn:lsid: Orthoptera .speciesfile.org:TaxonName:502864
Xiphidiopsis cheni: Bey-Bienko, 1955 View in CoL , Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 34:1261; Beier, 1966, Orthopterorum Catalogus, 9:274; Liu & Jin, 1994, Contributions from Shanghai Institute of Entomology, 11:110; Jin & Xia, 1994, Journal of Orthoptera View in CoL Research,
3:27; Liu & Jin, 1999, Fauna of Insects Fujian Province of China. Ƒol. 1.:159; Liu, 2007, The Fauna Orthopteroidea of Henan:480.
Xiphidiopsis zhejiangensis: Zheng & Shi, 1995 , Insects and macrofungi of Gutianshan, Zhejiang: 31.
Eoxizicus cheni: Liu & Zhang, 2000 View in CoL , Entomotaxonomia, 22(3):159.
Eoxizicus (Eoxizicus) cheni: Liu, Zhou & Bi, 2010 View in CoL , Insects of Fengyangshan National Nature Reserve, 82.
Diagnosis and discussion: The description of this species was precise. Bey-Bienko (1955) treated it a Xiphidiopsis . Gorochov (1993, 1998) did not include this species in his revisionary work on the tribe Meconematini . Liu (with Zhang, 2000) transferred it to Eoxizicus . In the present view, this species is more generally similar to Xiphidiopsis spp. owing to its uniform body colour, the genital segments ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 8–10 ) similar to Eoxizicus . However, the pronotal stripes are absent, and genitalia of male bear a conical tubercle ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 8–10 ) different from that of Eoxizicus species. This new combination seems to reconcile the conflict. The male genitalia of this species are not strongly sclerotized dorsally and the male subgenital plate is convex and not bifurcated apically ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 8–10 ). Considering Grigoriora contains very different species possibly belonging to different subgenera, we believe this combination is justified.
Type locality and preservation: Kuling town, Jiujiang city, Jiangxi province ; type specimens are kept in IZCAS.
Material examined: 2♂♂ 3♀♀, Hot spring, Mount Huang, Anhui province, 1983. IX.1, leg. BI Dao-Ying, HE Xiu-Song & HE Jin-Chuan; 2♀♀, Sangang village, Mount Wuyi, Fujian province, 1994. VIII.27 ~ IX.3, leg. YIN Hai-Sheng & JIN Xing-Bao; 10♂♂ 11♀♀, Mount Tiantong, Ningbo city, Zhejiang province, 2010. VII.18 ~20, leg. LIU Xian-Wei, QIU Zhong-Liang & GAO Chao.
Distribution: China (Henan, Anhui, Hubei, Zhejiang, Jiangxi, Fujian, Guangdong).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Grigoriora cheni ( Bey-Bienko, 1955 )
Wang, Hanqiang & Liu, Xianwei 2018 |
Eoxizicus (Eoxizicus) cheni
: Liu, Zhou & Bi 2010 |
Eoxizicus cheni:
Liu & Zhang 2000 |
Xiphidiopsis cheni:
Bey-Bienko 1955 |