Microplana groga Jones, Webster, Littlewood and Mc Donald, 2008
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00222933.2010.536267 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10536967 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E687FA-FFED-BC0B-FF62-FC0BFD9CF9D3 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Microplana groga Jones, Webster, Littlewood and Mc Donald, 2008 |
status |
|
Microplana groga Jones, Webster, Littlewood and Mc Donald, 2008 View in CoL
( Figures 1 View Figure 1 , 2 View Figure 2 , Table 1)
Material examined
The slides used for the identification of these animals from the area of el Montseny, el Molar (Catalunya, Northeastern Spain , one specimen, 1 February 2004), unfortunately have been lost .
Comparative discussion
Jones et al. (2008) described this species on the basis of five individuals previously identified as M. terrestris by Mateos et al. (1998). The individual presented here is attributed to M. groga and belongs to a population approximately 50 km from the type locality. It presents characteristics similar to those of the animals described by Jones et al. (2008) but it is externally different ( Figure 3A View Figure 3 ). Instead of being “reddish to black” it is cream with small darker spots covering the entire dorsal surface. However, the copulatory apparatus ( Figure 3B View Figure 3 ) is similar to that of M. groga , albeit that in our specimen the circular muscle layer surrounding the ejaculatory duct is stronger. Although we have observed differences between the external morphology of this specimen and M. groga we believe that both populations belong to the same species because of the similarities in the structure of the copulatory apparatus. Only after collecting new material will we be able to discern whether these are separate species rather than one, variable species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.