Plusioglyphiulus panhai, Golovatch & Geoffroy & Mauriès & Vandenspiegel, 2011
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.2940.1.1 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E4B924-FFCB-FFEC-FDCD-C937CAD8FDAA |
|
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
|
scientific name |
Plusioglyphiulus panhai |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Plusioglyphiulus panhai View in CoL sp. n. Figs 1−4 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 .
Material examined: Holotype male ( MNHN GA 072 About MNHN ), Thailand, Phachuap Khiri Khan Prov. , Sam Roi Yot Distr., Cave Tham Sai near sea shore, 20 m a.s.l., 14 December 2009, leg. S. Panha and members of the Animal Systematics Research Unit . Paratypes: 1 male, 1 female ( MNHN GA 072 About MNHN ) , 1 male, 1 female ( ZMUM) , 1 male, 1 female ( MZCU) , 1 female ( ZMUC) , 1 male ( SEM) , same locality, together with holotype .
Name: Honours Professor Somsak Panha, one of the collectors and the leader of a highly active group of invertebrate taxonomists (the Animal Systematics Research Unit) at Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Diagnosis: Differs from congeners in the peculiar, reduced carinotaxy of the metaterga, e.g. the presence of only two, not the usual three, transverse rows of crests on the metaterga, coupled with the small central outgrowth on male leg-pair 1, by the simple, plate-like anterior gonopods vividly resembling those in most of Glyphiulus species , and the complex posterior gonopods whose coxites are densely setose paramedially and supplied apically with a large fovea and an evident uncus, while the telopodites are evident and digitiform.
Description: Length 31–45 mm, width 1.3–1.7 mm, collum and midbody segments being equally broadest. Coloration uniformly dark grey-brown; antennae lighter, usually yellow-brown; legs red-brown.
Body with 68–77p+2a+T. Length of holotype about 41 mm, width 1.7 mm, with 76p+2a+T.
Clypeus with three teeth anteromedially. Antennae short and clavate ( Figs 1A View FIGURE 1 , 4A View FIGURE 4 ), antennomeres 6 and 7 each with a small group of bacilliform sensilla distodorsally ( Fig. 4A View FIGURE 4 ). Ocellaria large, vague due to complete depigmentation, ovoid in shape, with ocelli arranged at least in five longitudinal rows. Gnathochilarium ( Figs 2A View FIGURE 2 , 4B View FIGURE 4 ) rather polytrichous, with a separate promentum (n=2).
Postcollum constriction rather evident, due to a moderately enlarged collum ( Fig. 1D View FIGURE 1 ). Carinotaxy formula of collum: 1p/t+2p/t/+3p/(t)/t/+4p/(t)/(t)/t+pp/(t)/(t)/t+/(t)+mp/m/m ( Figs 1A, D View FIGURE 1 ). Carinotaxy of metaterga 2–4, 4/ 4+m/m+4/4 ( Figs 1A, D View FIGURE 1 ); formula of following metaterga, 2/2+I/i+1/1+m/m+1/1+I/i+2/2 ( Figs 1A–C, E, F View FIGURE 1 , 2E View FIGURE 2 ); all crests and tubercles, including poriferous cones, rather low. Dorsal crests on several posteriormost segments slightly higher than others ( Fig. 1C View FIGURE 1 ). Midbody segments ovoid in cross-section, nearly not compressed laterally ( Fig. 2E View FIGURE 2 ). Pleural regions of segments 2–4 conspicuously elongated, flap-shaped, especially so on segment 3 ( Fig. 1A View FIGURE 1 ). An evident, transverse pleural ridge behind gonopod aperture on male segment 7, with rounded flaps bent abruptly caudad. Tegument finely alveolate-areolate, dull throughout. Limbus very finely and rather regularly microdenticulate, thin. Epiproct broadly rounded apically, with 1+1 paramedian tubercles at midway; paraprocts evidently flattened, without an elevation at midline; hypoproct emarginate at caudal margin ( Figs 1C, F View FIGURE 1 , 2D View FIGURE 2 ).
Legs rather short, nearly as long as body diameter ( Figs 2C, E View FIGURE 2 ), claws with an evident and long spine near base ( Figs 2F View FIGURE 2 , 3A View FIGURE 3 , 4F View FIGURE 4 ). Tarsi and tarsal setae very delicately fringed.
Male legs 1 with an unusually short central hook and relatively moderately reduced, 3-segmented appendages ( Figs 2B View FIGURE 2 , 4C View FIGURE 4 ). Male legs 2 rather modestly enlarged, telopodite hirsute on frontal face; penes subtriangular, fused at base, with 2+2 long setae ( Figs 2B View FIGURE 2 , 4D View FIGURE 4 ). Male legs 3 as usual, with particularly elongate and slender coxae, and shortened telopodites ( Figs 2B View FIGURE 2 , 4E View FIGURE 4 ).
Anterior gonopods very simple, plate-shaped, much like in Glyphiulus , with a paramedian pair of anterior coxosternal processes (cxp) densely setose distally, digitiform, contiguous and only basally fused; ventrolateral corners of coxosternum with a conspicuous, rounded, nearly even lobe (lo); telopodites (te) elongate, digitiform, attached to coxal region on caudal face, probably capable of movement, each carrying a few setae subapically ( Figs 3D View FIGURE 3 , 4G View FIGURE 4 ). Posterior gonopods smaller, complex, coxites well separated from sternum, densely setose paramedially, each surmounted by an evident fovea and a pointed uncus apically, and flanked laterally by a digitiform, apically finely fringed telopodite (te) ( Figs 3B, C View FIGURE 3 , 4H View FIGURE 4 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.