Pochazia shantungensis ( Chou & Lu, 1977 )

Kobayashi, Shigeki, Suzuki, Masahiro, Kuwahara, Ryosuke, Park, Jaekook, Yamada, Kazutaka & Jung, Sunghoon, 2024, Reevaluation of taxonomic identity of the recently introduced invasive planthopper, Pochazia shantungensis (Chou & Lu, 1977) (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidea: Ricaniidae) in Japan, Zootaxa 5446 (2), pp. 151-178 : 155-169

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5446.2.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E784D1FE-10BE-4BE2-AA6E-E4AB1DBCAF42

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11104499

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E41243-0434-816D-5EF5-14A2FB1BFF5C

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Pochazia shantungensis ( Chou & Lu, 1977 )
status

 

Pochazia shantungensis ( Chou & Lu, 1977) View in CoL

Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 , 4 View FIGURE 4 , 6–9 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 , 11–15 View FIGURE 11 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 View FIGURE 15 .

Ricania shantungensis Chou & Lu, 1977: 315 View in CoL , 317, fig. 11. Type locality: Shandong, Heze ( China); Chou et al. 1985: 82; Shen et al. 2007: 116; Kwon et al. 2017: 901; Hizal et al. 2019: 9816–9818, figs. 1–3; Kang et al. 2020: 3813.

Pochazia shantungensis View in CoL : Rahman et al. 2012: 243–246, figs. 3, 4; Duan & Chen 2020: 211, Pl. I-4, 9, 14, Pl. II-19, 24, Pl. III-29, 34, Pl. IV-39, Pl. V-47, 48, Pl. VI-54, 59, 64, 69; Bourgoin et al. 2020: 271–272, figs. 1–3; Ishida et al. 2020: Pl. 5, 22–23; Schrader 2021: 1–8; Hasegawa et al. 2022: 128, Table 7 [Catalogued]; Stroiński et al. 2022: 276–281, figs. 3–30; Stroiński & Bourgoin 2022: 273; Zhuravleva et al. 2023: 3–4, fig. 4.

Ricania sp. : Choi et al. 2011: 368–371, figs. 1, 2; Choi et al. 2012: 143–147, figs. 1, 2.

Ricania sublimata Jacobi, 1916 View in CoL [Misidentification]: Park & Jung 2020: 318–322, figs. 1, 2; Park & Jung 2021: 1295–1297, figs. 1B, 2G, 3M, N, 4G, 11.

Diagnosis. The color of the general habitus of P. shantungensis is very similar to P. sublimata ( Jacobi, 1916) . However, the genitalia exhibit good diagnostic characters, especially the short dorsal process on phallic complex in male ( Fig. 8D–F, J–L View FIGURE 8 ; Duan & Chen 2020: Pl. IV-39, Pl. V-48), shorter than 1/2 length of phallobase, 450–485 / 915–1235 µm in the present study (vs. longer than 1/2) ( Fig. 8M, D, E View FIGURE 8 , Duan & Chen 2020: Pl. IV-38, Pl. V-46); in female, anal segment is 1.0× length of gonoplac in lateral view (vs. 1.4×) ( Fig. 9A View FIGURE 9 ; Duan & Chen 2020: Pl. VI-53, 54, 68, 69); 0.96–1.19× (1740 / 1460, 1330 / 1350, 1570 / 1620 µm) in the present study. The eastern Asian species P. albomaculata has a similarly white costal spot on brown tegmen ( Fig. 16A–C, E–I View FIGURE 16 ), but differs from P. shantungensis by the lack of the ventral process in male ( Fig. 16K–N View FIGURE 16 ) and anal segment being 0.5× length of gonoplac in lateral view in female ( Fig. 16O View FIGURE 16 ).

Fifth instar nymph of P. shantungensis can be distinguished from that of P. sublimata by the following characters: white mesonotum and wing pads with dark brown patches (vs. uniformly yellowish brown); two pairs of spiny-shaped black spots and dark brown patches on metanotum (vs. no spot and patch) ( Figs. 14 View FIGURE 14 , 15 A, G, I View FIGURE 15 ; Yang 1989: 197–199, fig. 14).

Description. Adult ( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 , 4 View FIGURE 4 , 6 View FIGURE 6 , 7 View FIGURE 7 ). See also Duan & Chen (2020, Pl. I-4, 9, 14, Pl. II-19, 24).

Measurements (Japanese specimens): body length (including tegmen): male 11.2–13.0 mm (mean 11.9 mm, n = 11), female 12.4–14.1 mm (mean 13.5 mm, n = 13); frons to distal abdomen length: male 5.6–7.8 mm (mean 6.5 mm, n = 15), female 6.0– 8.1 mm (mean 6.9 mm, n = 8); tegmen length: male 10.2–12.0 mm (mean 11.1 mm, n = 10), female 11.0– 13.5 mm (mean 12.7 mm, n = 15). Male genitalia (n = 8): length and width: anal segment 775 × 415 µm ( Fig. 8N View FIGURE 8 ); pygofer 925 × 790 µm ( Fig. 8M View FIGURE 8 ); genital style 920–945 µm × 370 µm ( Fig. 7M View FIGURE 7 ). Phallic complex ( Fig. 8D–F View FIGURE 8 ): phallobase 915–1235 µm in length, 350–410 µm in diameter, with three pairs of spinose processes ( Fig. 8D–I View FIGURE 8 ): dorsal one 450–485 µm in length, lateral view ( Fig. 8M, D, E View FIGURE 8 ), lateral one 125–290 µm in length, 130–190 µm in width at base ( Fig. 8D View FIGURE 8 ), ventral one 275–500 µm in length ( Fig. 8D, F View FIGURE 8 ), aedeagus 840–1165 µm in length ( Fig. 8J–L View FIGURE 8 ). Female genitalia (n = 5): length and width: anal segment 1570–1780 µm × 1470–1480 µm ( Fig. 9F View FIGURE 9 ); gonoplac (third valve) 1450–1550 µm × 1300–1580 µm ( Fig. 9B, C View FIGURE 9 ); gonapophysis VIII 1200 –1700 µm × 1700–1900 µm (process) ( Fig. 9H, I View FIGURE 9 ); gonapophyses IX 960–1000 µm × 270–290 µm ( Fig. 9G View FIGURE 9 ); pregenital tergite 1940, 2300 µm × 100–180, 270–400 µm ( Fig. 9D View FIGURE 9 ). Pregenital sternite 3000, 3700 µm × 250–810, 430–950 µm ( Fig. 9E View FIGURE 9 ). Egg ( Fig. 13A View FIGURE 13 ): oval shape, 0.99–1.15 mm in diameter (mean 1.04 mm, n = 4). Nymphs ( Figs. 12H–K View FIGURE 12 , 13B–F View FIGURE 13 ): white in coloration ( Figs. 12H–K View FIGURE 12 , 13B–F View FIGURE 13 , 14 View FIGURE 14 ) with the following body length: first instar 1.19, 1.28 mm ( Fig. 13B, C View FIGURE 13 ); second instar 1.32, 1.34 mm ( Fig. 13D View FIGURE 13 ); third instar 1.64, 1.66 mm ( Fig. 13E View FIGURE 13 ); fourth instar 2.23, 2.30 mm ( Fig. 13F View FIGURE 13 ); fifth instar 3.18, 3.28 mm. Fifth instar: head width (including eyes) 1.32, 1.33 mm; anterior wing pad length: 1.74, 1.84 mm; antenna length: 0.82, 0.88 mm.

Male genitalia ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ). Rahman et al. (2012: 243–245, figs. 3) gave description based on specimens from Korea. See also Duan & Chen (2020, Pl. III-29, 34, Pl. IV-39, Pl. V-47, 48), Stroiński et al. (2022, figs. 13–23), Shichiri & Sakuma (2022, fig. 1C, D), Nakada (2022, fig. 2A) and Harusawa & Miyatake (2023, fig. 1) for specimens from China, Italy and Japan.

Female genitalia ( Fig.9 View FIGURE 9 ). Park &Jung(2020:321,fig.2H–N)described as ‘ Ricania sublimata ’[misidentification] based on a Korean specimen. See also Duan & Chen (2020, Pl. VI-54, 59, 64, 69) and Stroiński et al. (2022, figs. 24–30) for specimens from China and Italy.

Fifth instar nymph ( Figs. 14 View FIGURE 14 , 15 View FIGURE 15 ) (n = 6). General color white. Frons and vertex white; laterofrons with 25–26 sensory pits ( Fig. 15B View FIGURE 15 ). Pronotum with about 28–31 pits on each side ( Fig. 15D, E View FIGURE 15 ) and two pairs of black spots, smaller ones near body midline, larger oblique ones behind eyes ( Figs. 14A, C–E View FIGURE 14 , 15A, D, E View FIGURE 15 ). Mesonotum dark brown at distal 3/4 and from front area to 3/4 with a pair of large black spots ( Figs. 14B, D View FIGURE 14 , 15F, I View FIGURE 15 ). Metanotum dark brown from distal area to the middle ( Figs. 14B, C View FIGURE 14 , 15I View FIGURE 15 ) with two pairs of spiny shaped black spots at the middle ( Fig. 15G View FIGURE 15 ). Wing pads brown to dark brown, except base and costal margin: anterior wing pad with a pair of large black spots ( Fig. 15F View FIGURE 15 ); posterior wing pad without black spot ( Fig. 15G View FIGURE 15 ), a pair of small black spots on dorsal area of metathorax ( Fig. 15I View FIGURE 15 ). Legs white, tarsus brown ( Fig. 14 View FIGURE 14 ); fore femur with five or six small teeth laterally at apical half ( Fig. 15J View FIGURE 15 ); mid femur with seven teeth laterally ( Fig. 15K View FIGURE 15 ); hind tibia with three teeth laterally, six or seven apically ( Fig. 15L, M View FIGURE 15 ), first tarsal segment with six apical teeth, second without tooth ( Fig. 15P–S View FIGURE 15 ). Abdominal tergites white, dark brown at lateral side; tergites IV–V on each lateral side with 4–5 and 5 pits, respectively, one pit of V laterodorsally; tergite VI on each side with 5 wax-pore plates, 2 ventrally, 3 dorsally, each with a sensory pit laterally embedded in plate ( Fig. 15T, U View FIGURE 15 ). Tergite VII distinctly narrower than preceding ones, incised at posterior margin in dorsal view ( Fig. 15A View FIGURE 15 ). Wax-pore plates of seventh and eighth segments elongate, of seventh each with 2 pits embedded in ventral half of plate, another one associated with a separate plate ( Fig. 15X View FIGURE 15 ), of eighth each with 9 pits embedded in lateral margin of plate, single in top, double in remains ( Fig. 15W View FIGURE 15 ). Ninth abdominal segment with opening caudad, elongate triangular, anal combs large, two pairs of processes at dorsal half, medial one about 3× length of dorsal one ( Fig. 15Z View FIGURE 15 ).

Material examined. 162 exx. (54 ♂, 108 ♀). Adults: Kyoto Pref.: 1 ♀, Keihanna Commemorative Park, Seika, 6.VII.2022, Y. Inamoto leg., on Morus indica, OMU 114. Nara Pref.: 1 ♂, Takama-cho, Nara City, 2.XI.2022, M. Suzuki leg., OMU 090; 5 ♀, Nara-shi, Saki-chô, Heijô-kyô Palace Site, 34.6930˚N, 135.7905˚E, 21.X.2019, R. Matsumoto ( MNHAH); 2 ♀, Ikaruga-cho, 24. VI.2023, W. Nitta leg., OMU 135, 136; 1 ♂, Gojo-shi, Gojô, 34.3488˚N, 135.7052˚E, 22.X.2019, R. Matsumoto ( MNHAH). Osaka Pref. : 1 ♀, Furuedai, Suita, 26.X.2022, K. Nakatani leg., on Pueraria montana var. lobata, OMU 088; 1 ♀, Oike, Ibaraki, 29.IX.2022, M. Tanida leg., OMU 089; 2 ♀, Osaka-shi, Sumiyoshi-ku, Nagai Park, 18. VI.2022, R. Matsumoto ( MNHAH); 1 ♀, same locality, 14.VII.2022, K. Yamada ( MNHAH); 1 ♀, Near Nisanzai-Kofun, Sakai, 3.VII.2023, S. Kobayashi, on Triadica sebifera , 34.548314 ˚N, 135.498961˚E, el. 23.4 m, OMU 146; 2 ♂ 6 ♀, Osaka Metro. Univ., Sakai , 20& 29. VI.2023, S. Kobayashi, on Quercus acutissima, OMU 138–145; 1 ♀, Kanan, Rv. Ishi [Ishi River], 1.X.2015, S. Shiyake leg., SK1032 ( OMNH); 1 ♂, Hatsugano, Izumi, IX.2021, Y. Kumura leg., OMU 130; 1 ♀, Okayama-cho, Kishiwada, 22.X.2022, M. Kawai leg. ( NHMKCO); 1 ♀, Hashimoto, Kaizuka, 20.IX.2021, K. Temma leg., on Mallotus japonicus, OMU 116. [M. Suzuki leg.]: 1 ♂, Botanical Gardens of Osaka Metro. Univ., Katano , 6.VII.2023, on Lagerstroemia indica, OMU 137; 5 ♂ 17 ♀, Fukakita Ryokuchi, Daito, 19.X.2022, on Ulmus parvifolia , Triadica sebifera and Celtis sinensis, OMU 061–082 ( SK 1022 ♂ | OMU 062, SK1023 ♀ | OMU 082); 2 ♂ 1 ♀, Osaka Sangyo Univ., Daito , 22&29.III, 5.IV.2023 em., egg on Cinnamomum camphora , 21.I.2023 (coll.), OUM 127–129; 1 ♀, Chidoribashi Park, Osaka , 11.VII.2023, on Cinnamomum camphora, OMU 174; 1 ♂, Kire, Osaka , 16. VI.2023, on Quercus glauca, OMU 131; 1 ♂ 2 ♀, Houzen-ji, Kashiwara, 15.X.2022, on Olea europaea and Acer palmatum, OMU 084–086; 1 ♀, Ogata, Kashiwara, 7.XII.2022, on Cinnamomum camphora, OMU 087; 1 ♀, Mozu-cho, Sakai, 15.X.2022, on Quercus glateragauca, OMU 039; 12 ♂ 26 ♀, Osaka Metro. Univ., Sakai , 14& 18.X.2022, Adult on Acca sellowiana , Camellia sasanqua and Ligustrum vulgare, OMU 001–038 ( SK 1020 ♂ | OMU 001, SK1021 ♀ | OMU 006, SK1029 ♀ | OMU 0034, OMU 010, 011 are deposited in MNHAH); 1 ♂ 1 ♀, Hata, Sakai, 18.X.2022, on Pueraria montana var. lobata, OMU 040, 041; 6 ♂ 13 ♀, Sakai Nature Forest, Sakai, 16& 28.X.2022, on Ailanthus altissima and Ilex serrata, OMU 042–060 ( SK 1024 ♂ (wing)| OMU 048, SK1025 ♂ (wing) | OMU 049, SK1026 ♀ (wing) | OMU 052, SK1027 (wing)/SK1030 ♀ | OMU 058, OMU 043, 050, 059, 060 deposited in MNHAH); 2 ♂ 3 ♀, Hachigamineji, Sakai, 17.VII.2023, on Ligustrum lucidum , Quercus glauca and Q. serrata, OMU 182–186; 1 ♂, Fuseya, Izumi, 8.XI.2022, on Ilex rotunda, OMU 083. [Y. Yamuchi leg.]: 1 ♀, Ote-cho, Ibaraki, 31.X.2022, adult on Citreae sp., OMU 109; 2 ♀, Hattori Ryokuchi, Toyonaka, 29.X.2022, on Camellia japonica and Ligustrum lucidum, OMU 095, 096; 3 ♂ 4 ♀, Fujisaka-minami-machi, Hirakata, 30.X.2022, on Solidago altissima , Camellia sasanqua , Quercus glauca and Celtis sinensis, OMU 097–103; 1 ♂ 2 ♀, Neyagawa Park, Neyagawa, 30.X.2022, on Osmanthus fragrans var. aurantiacus and Camellia sasanqua, OMU 104–106; 1 ♀, Minamino, Shijonawate, 30.X.2022, on Camellia sasanqua, OMU 107; 1 ♀, Nozaki, Daito, 30.X.2022, on Ligustrum lucidum, OMU 108; 1 ♂ 3 ♀, Shirokita Wando, Asahi, Osaka , 23.X.2022, on Solidago altissima , Triadica sebifera and Ligustrum lucidum, OMU 091– 094. Wakayama Pref.: 2 ♂, Nakado, Hashimoto, 24. VI.2023, N. Hiraiwa leg., on Rubus fruticosus, OMU 132, 133; 2 ♀, Mouko, Kainan, 2& 15.VII.2023, M. Suzuki leg., on Solidago altissima, OMU 134, 175. Hyogo Pref.: 2 ♂, Akashi-koen Park, south of Fujimiike, Akashi, 14.IX.2022, A. Ichikawa ( MNHAH). Hiroshima Pref.: 2 ♀, Sannomaru-cho, Fukuyama, 27.X.2022, K. Iida & T. Ueda leg., on “Sunflower” [= Helianthus sp. ], OMU 112–113.

Kumamoto Pref.: 8 ♂ 1 ♀, Kurokami , Kumamoto, 32.8176934˚N, 130.7211841˚E, 20& 29–30.IX.2021 (Light), R. Kuwahara leg. , preserved in 70 % ethanol, specimen vial ID CS024-51 (2 ♂) , 52 (1 ♂), 53 (5 ♂), CS037-35 (1 ♀) ( MNHAH).

Fifth instar nymphs: 17 exx. Osaka Pref. : [M. Suzuki leg.]: 1 exuvum, Fukakita Ryokuchi, Daito, 27.X– 1.XI.2022 em., on Akebia quinate , 19.X.2022, OMU 115 (exuvum)/ OMU 061(emerged adult); 3 exx., Osaka Sangyo University, Daito, 21.I.2023, from eggs on Cinnamomum camphora , Zelkova serrata , and Cornus florida, OMU 117–119; 6 exx., Sakai Nature Forest, Sakai, 25.II.2023, from eggs on Deutzia crenata, OMU 120–125; 1 ex., Hachigamine-ji, Sakai, 25.II.2023, from eggs on Castanea crenata, OMU 126. Wakayama Pref.: 6 exx., Nakado, Hashimoto, 24. VI.2023, N. Hiraiwa leg., on Rubus fruticosus, OMU 155.

Distribution. Japan: Honshu: Chiba ( Ban 2023), Saitama ( Osada 2023, Nozawa et al. 2023), Tokyo ( Han 2023, Miyazaki 2023), Gunma ( Kanasugi 2024), Kanagawa ( Shichiri & Sakuma 2022), Shizuoka ( Nakada 2022), Gifu ( Kawakami 2022), Aichi ( Yoshitsuru 2023), Mie ( Nishikawa 2024), Kyoto ( Kawai 2024), Nara ( Ito 2023, Tominaga 2023), Osaka , Hyogo, Wakayama ( Ishida et al. 2020), Okayama ( Suenaga 2023), Hiroshima (new record) Prefectures, Kyushu: Kumamoto Prefecture ( Takeuchi 2023); China: Shandong ( Chou & Lu, 1977), Zhejiang ( Chou et al. 1985); Korea ( Rahman et al. 2012); Russia ( Zhuravleva et al. 2023); Turkey ( Hizal et al. 2019); the Netherlands (EPPO RS 2023); Germany ( Schrader 2021); Italy (Stroiński et al. 2022); France ( Bourgoin et al. 2020).

Countries underlined denote type-locality countries.

Host plants in Japan. ( Table 3 View TABLE 3 , fig. 2). Aquifoliaceae : Ilex rotunda Thunb. ; Lauraceae : Cinnamomum camphora (L.) J.Presl; Oleaceae : Ligustrum lucidum W.T.Aiton and L. vulgare L., Osmanthus fragrans var. aurantiacus Makino ; Sapindaceae : Acer palmatum Thunb. ; Simaroubaceae : Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle ; Theaceae : Camellia japonica L., C. sasanqua Thunb. ; Ulmaceae : Ulmus parvifolia Jacq. , Zelkova serrata (Thunb.) Makino etc.

Biology ( Figs. 11–14 View FIGURE 11 View FIGURE 12 View FIGURE 13 View FIGURE 14 ). This species has two generations per year in Zhejiang, China ( Li et al. 2006; Shen et al. 2007) and one generation per year in Korea ( Choi et al. 2012, fig. 3 as Ricania sp. ; Baek et al. 2019); overwintering takes place in the egg stage on tree branches, nymphs emerged in April and July, adults in June and September ( Shen et al. 2007). In Europe, the adults were collected in June and around October ( Bourgoin et al. 2020; Stroiński et al. 2022). In Japan, this species has two generations per year and overwinters in the egg stage on tree branches in Osaka Prefecture. The adults were observed in June, July and between September to December. In Sakai, the adults have been observed around agricultural fields and at forest edge in July, September and October from 2015 to 2022 ( Fig. 11A–C View FIGURE 11 ). In Kumamoto, many adults were observed to attract around lights at night. The females laid white eggs in the branches and stems of host plants; the tip of egg masses was covered with white waxy filaments ( Fig. 12A–E View FIGURE 12 ); ca. 2–5 cm in the length; old egg masses lacked the filaments in winter ( Fig. 12F, G View FIGURE 12 ).

Remarks. This species has black tegmina in ground color, covered with a thin white and distinct brown wax layer, but old and/or dried pinned specimen often lack wax layer and look dark ( Fig. 3C, F, H, K View FIGURE 3 ). Emerged adults were at first general white ( Fig. 11H–I View FIGURE 11 ), and become general black which red eyes in coloration ( Fig. 11J, K View FIGURE 11 ), and covered with brown wax layer in three days ( Fig. 11L View FIGURE 11 ). We identified Ricaniidae gen. sp. 1–3 of Yoshitsuru (2023) from Aichi Prefecture as P. shantungensis by the rounded triangular-shaped costal spot on forewing.

In the present study, this species was collected on more than 32 plant families, 61 species, particularly on Ligustrum and Camellia species, and Cinnamomum camphora ( Table 3 View TABLE 3 ). In Osaka Prefecture , the roadside tree, Cinnamomum camphora and the hedge plant, Ligustrum vulgare had the highest density of this species (> 50 adults and egg masses per one collecting); the egg masses were found in particular on Camellia sasanqua and C. japonica trees in winter. Several authors observed egg-laying females or on white waxy filaments of egg mass on several trees, e.g. Fagaceae , Lauraceae , Magnoliaceae , Moraceae ( Shichiri & Sakuma 2022, 94; Miyazaki 2023, 15; Nozawa et al. 2023, 67). In private and public gardens, the species was reported on several host plants (information from the internet), e.g., Celastraceae : Euonymus japonicus ; Fagaceae : Quercus myrsinaefolia ; Rosaceae : Spiraea thunbergii ; Rubiaceae : Gardenia jasminoides ; Sapindaceae : Maple ( Acer ); sometimes with> 10 adults and/or nymphs per shoot or tree.

One female adult was attended by three arboreal ants, Camponotus vitiosus Smith, 1874 ( Formicidae ) in Keihanna Commemorative Park, Kyoto Prefecture ( Fig. 11E View FIGURE 11 ); One of the ants fed on the planthopper excreted honeydew. Another female adult was also attended by a Camponotus ant in Sakai, Osaka Prefecture.

R

Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile

VI

Mykotektet, National Veterinary Institute

OMNH

Osaka Museum of Natural History

SK

Katedralskolan

OUM

Oxford University Museum of Natural History

T

Tavera, Department of Geology and Geophysics

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Ricaniidae

Genus

Pochazia

Loc

Pochazia shantungensis ( Chou & Lu, 1977 )

Kobayashi, Shigeki, Suzuki, Masahiro, Kuwahara, Ryosuke, Park, Jaekook, Yamada, Kazutaka & Jung, Sunghoon 2024
2024
Loc

Pochazia shantungensis

Zhuravleva, E. N. & Gnezdilov, V. M. & Tishechkin, D. Y. & Mikhailenko, A. P. & Shoshina, E. I. & Karpun, N. N. & Musolin, D. L. 2023: 3
Hasegawa, M. & Ishida, S. & Matsui, S. & Matsumoto R & Osada, Y. & Shiyake, S. & Uemura, S. & Wada, T. 2022: 128
Stroinski, A. & Bourgoin, T. 2022: 273
Schrader, G. 2021: 1
Duan, W. & Chen, X. 2020: 211
Bourgoin, T. & Gros, P. & Stroinski, A. 2020: 271
Rahman, M. A. & Kwon, Y. J. & Suh, S. J. & Youn, Y. N. & Jo, S. H. 2012: 243
2012
Loc

Ricania sp.

Choi, D. S. & Kim, D. I. & Ko, S. J. & Kang, B. R. & Lee, K. S. & Park, J. D. & Choi, K. J. 2012: 143
Choi, Y. S. & Hwang, I. S. & Kang, T. J. & Choi, Y. S. & Hwang, I. S. & Kang, T. J. & Lim, J. R. & Choe, K. R. 2011: 368
2011
Loc

Ricania shantungensis

Kang, J. Y. & An, I. & Park, S. 2020: 3813
Hizal, E. & Oztemiz, S. & Gjonov, I. 2019: 9816
Kwon, D. H. & Kim, S. J. & Kang, T. J. & Lee, J. H. & Kim, D. H. 2017: 901
Shen, Q. & Wang, J. Y. & Liu, J. D. & Chen, Y. F. & Fan, X. H. & Zhu, Y. Q. 2007: 116
Chou, I. & Lu, J. & Huang, J. & Wang, S. 1985: 82
Chou, I. & Lu, C. 1977: 315
1977
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF