Megalopta (Noctoraptor) atlantica, Santos, Leandro M. & Silveira, Fernando A., 2009
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.189461 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5449459 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E38A4C-8639-6664-FF5B-77B0FA7CC61C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Megalopta (Noctoraptor) atlantica |
status |
|
Key to the species of Megalopta View in CoL occuring in Minas Gerais
Although this study focused on the species of Minas Gerais, the present key includes all species currently known to occur in the Southeastern and Southern Regions of Brazil (states of Santa Catarina, Paraná, São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Espírito Santo, in addition to Minas Gerais).
Females
[unknown for M. (Noctoraptor) atlantica sp. n.]
1 Lateral surface of metapostnotum reticulate at least along its posterior margin, sometimes rugulose on the lateralmost section of the anterior margin; posterior margin of metapostnotum straight or gently arcuate, gradually curved towards the anterior margin laterally ( Figs. 3 View FIGURE 3 , 4); disc of scutellum convex, dorsal surface of axilla and contiguous antero-lateral margin of scutellum below level of disc of scutellum as seen from behind .......................................... 2
- Lateral surface of metapostnotum polished, although sometimes minutely punctate; posterior margin of metapostnotum straight, abruptly bending laterally toward metanotum (Figs. 5, 6); disc of scutellum uniformly flat or very gently arcuate, dorsal surface of axilla and contiguous antero-lateral margin of scutellum on same or almost on same plane as disc of scutellum as seen from behind ........................................................................................................... 3
2 Metepisternal process conspicuous, wide, with velvety pilosity ( Fig. 1); longitudinal rugae of metapostnotum short throughout its surface, not reaching its posterior margin, normally stronger laterally ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ); disc of metapostnotum slightly convex, its posterior margin frequently depressed in relation to contiguous surface of propodeum ............... .................................................................................................................................................. M. aegis ( Vachal, 1904) View in CoL
- Metepisternal process inconspicuous, narrow and without velvety pilosity ( Fig. 2); longitudinal rugae of metapostnotum stronger in the mid triangular depression, longer medially, shortening laterad (Fig. 4); disc of metapostnotum concave, its posterior margin at same level or above contiguous surface of propodeum .... M. sodalis ( Vachal, 1904) View in CoL
3 Metepisternal process, inconspicuous, narrow, without velvety pilosity ( Fig. 2); longitudinal rugae of metapostnotum absent, ferruginous with metallic green hues restricted to lateral areas .................... M. amoena ( Spinola, 1853) View in CoL
- Metepisternal process, conspicuous, wide, covered by velvety pilosity ( Fig. 1); metapostnotum with at least one weak but distinct mid-longitudinal ruga, shiny, entirely and homogeneously green, light brown or black ................... ....................................................................................................................................................... M. guimaraesi sp. n.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |