Paraedessa verhoeffi (Breddin, 1904) Breddin, 1904
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3716.3.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:798449F3-C14D-4D9D-B2E1-505EE2BC6115 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6158054 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E387AB-FF98-BE0B-4589-5CB8FE35FF6F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Paraedessa verhoeffi (Breddin, 1904) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Paraedessa verhoeffi (Breddin, 1904) n. comb.
(Figures: 45–49, 58, 59)
Edessa verhoeffi Breddin, 1904: 149 ; Bergroth, 1908: 179; Kirkaldy, 1909: 166. Holotype female. Colômbia, Cauca. (SDEI). Examined.
Material examined. VENEZUELA. Amazonas: ♂ Maturaca, 6-IV-64, Col. J. Bechyne (MIZA). COLÔMBIA. Amazonas: ♀ W. O Tarapacá Vereda San José km 6 Escuela Sabio Caldas Leticia, 29-May-1992, A. Saenz, leg. (UFRG); ♂ 5-Jun-1992. (UFRG). PERU. Loreto: 4 ♀ 7 ♂ Explorama Lodge 50 mi NE Iquitos on Amazon R. 12– 19-III-1988, J. E. Eger. Col (JEE); ♀ 80 km NE Iquitos, Explorama Lodge, 1 km from Amazon R. on R. Yanamono; 1– 5 -IX, J. Castner, P. Skelley et al., human dung pitfall. (JEE); ♀ (UFRG). BRAZIL. Amazonas: 2 ♂ ♀ Manaus, Reserva Ducke, Em 5–68 col. E.V. Silva & A. Faustino (INPA); ♂ ♀ Manacapuru, Mar-1928, S. M. Klages (KSBS); ♀ Benjamim Constant, Rio Javari, 2-1942, B. Pohl (MZUSP); ♂ Estirão do Equador 04°33’S, 71° 38’ W (Rio Javari) X-1979, Alvarenga, M. Col. (UFRG).
Measurements. Total length: 10.1–12.1; head length: 1.0–1.4; head width: 2.4–2.6; pronotal length: 2.3–2.5; pronotal width: 6.3–7.2; abdominal width: 5.4–6.7; length of antennal segments (I: 0.4–0.5; II: 1.0–1.1; III: 1.2– 1.6; IV: 2.3–2.7; V: 2.3–2.8).
Male: Pygophore with dorsal rim concave and furrowed ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 45 – 49 ); posterolateral angles not developed ( Figs. 45, 47 View FIGURES 45 – 49 ). Genital cup processes elongated, narrowed gradually towards the apex, barely concave, emerging near proctiger; rounded to acuminated apex, slightly surpassing the dorsal rim in lateral view ( Fig. 46 View FIGURES 45 – 49 ). Parameres flat, triangular, long and curved; anterior expansion digitiform and small ( Figs. 45–46, 48 View FIGURES 45 – 49 ); apex acute and surpassing dorsal rim in lateral view, surpassing the posterior limits of the pygophore in ventral view ( Fig. 47 View FIGURES 45 – 49 ). Dorsal face of proctiger very short; with distal shallow concavity ( Figs. 45–46 View FIGURES 45 – 49 ). Lateral face of the proctiger with a slight constriction ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 45 – 49 ). Lateral expansion of proctiger trapezoidal, curved, large, three times wider than the anal opening and with acute lateral angles; projected dorsally, almost reaching the dorsal face ( Figs. 45–46 View FIGURES 45 – 49 ). Ventral rim with lobes slightly developed, not reaching level of posterolateral angle ( Fig. 47 View FIGURES 45 – 49 ).
Female: Gonocoxites 8 half-moon shaped, greatly reduced, laterally placed, widely separated medially; proximal angle closer to middle line than distal angle; distal angle dentiform, short, curved and contiguous with gonapophyses 8 ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 45 – 49 ). Gonocoxites 8 overlapping gonapophyses 8 in all of its extension.
Comments. This is the first description of the male. Paraedessa verhoeffi is identified by the elongated genital cup process, with rounded to acuminated apex; parameres triangular; dorsal face of the proctiger very short compared with other species, around four times as wide as long; ventral rim slightly excavated and gonocoxites 8 half-moon shaped with proximal angle closer to middle line than distal angle. This species and P. ecuadoriensis sp. nov., P. silvicola sp. nov. and P. stolida share a quite similar shape of the lateral expansion of proctiger. This species share some similarities in the genitalia of both sexes with P. heymonsi .
Distribution ( Fig. 59 View FIGURE 59 ): VENEZUELA: Amazonas; COLÔMBIA: Cauca, Amazonas; PERU: Loreto; BRAZIL: Amazonas.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |