Orthomorpha sericata

Likhitrakarn, Natdanai, Golovatch, Sergei I. & Panha, Somsak, 2010, The millipede genus Orthomorpha Bollman, 1893 in Thailand. 1. Revision of the sericata - group, with descriptions of four new species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae), Zootaxa 2361, pp. 23-45 : 45

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.193638

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6199327

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E3878E-FF8C-FFD2-E584-FF0EFA04FCA7

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Orthomorpha sericata
status

 

Key to species of the sericata View in CoL -group

1. At least surface of metaterga leathery, dull.................................................................................................................. 2.

- Dorsal surface shining ................................................................................................................................................ 4.

2. Only caudal parts of paraterga contrastingly light ( Figs 14 View FIGURE 14 A–G, J–L). Paraterga less strongly developed, narrower, with only a small incision at best in front 1/3 extent ( Figs 14 View FIGURE 14 A, C, E, J & L). No tergal setae borne on evident knobs/ tubercles ....................................................................................................................................................... O. sericata View in CoL

- Entire paraterga contrastingly light, much broader, largely with an evident, dentiform incision in front 1/3 extent ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 B, D & K, 7B & D). At least some tergal setae borne on evident knobs/tubercles .......................................... 3.

3. Surface of metaterga rough, microgranulate and rugulose ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 B–H, K–M). Metatergal setigerous tubercles higher, present also on collum. Paratergal incisions especially prominent ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 B–E, K & L). ....... O. enghoffi sp. n.

- Surface of metaterga nearly smooth, microgranulate ( Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 B–H). Metatergal setigerous tubercles evidently smaller, absent from collum. Paratergal incisions evident, but not so prominent ( Figs 7 View FIGURE 7 B & D) .................... O. alutaria View in CoL sp. n.

4. Adults> 30 mm long and> 4 mm wide. Collum broadly rounded laterally ( Figs 12 View FIGURE 12 B & C). Paraterga set high, at least some upturned above dorsum. Sternal cones between male coxae 4 isolated ( Figs 12 View FIGURE 12 I & J). ............................... ..................................................................................................................................................... O. parasericata View in CoL sp. n.

- Adults <30 mm long and <4 mm wide. Collum narrowly rounded to angulate laterally ( Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 B &C, 9B & C). Paraterga set high, but remaining below dorsum even in male. Sternal cones between male coxae 4 fused basally into a single lamina ( Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 I & J, 9I & J)............................................................................................................................ 5.

5. Bases of paraterga more broadly light ( Figs 5 View FIGURE 5 A–H). Legs shorter, about 1.2 (male) or 1.0 times (female) as long as midbody height. Tip of solenophore like an elongate and undulate lobe ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 C & D, 6) ................... O. subsericata View in CoL

- Bases of paraterga more narrowly light ( Figs 9 View FIGURE 9 A–H). Legs longer, about 1.5 (male) or 1.2–1.3 times (female) as long as midbody height. Tip of solenophore tridentate ( Figs 10 View FIGURE 10 , 11 View FIGURE 11 A & B). .............................................. O. asticta View in CoL sp. n.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF