Mimotettix tibetensis, Dai, Wu & Zhang, Yalin, 2010
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.198836 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6198352 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E35F34-F50A-FFD1-FF0C-FF57FDAAFCB1 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Mimotettix tibetensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Mimotettix tibetensis View in CoL sp. nov.
Fig.15 View FIGURE 15
Type material. Holotype 3, China: Tibet, Motuo, 1310m, 3. Sept. 1979, Jin Gentao and Wu Jianyi; Paratypes: China, 1Ƥ, same data as holotype; 3Ƥ, same data as holotype except: 2Ƥ, 28 Sept. 1979, 1Ƥ, 22 Sept. 1979, 1Ƥ, 1250m, 19 Sept. 1979; 13, Tibet, Motuo, Beibeng, 950m, 16 June 1980, Jin Gentao and Wu Jianyi (all in SEM).
Etymology. The species name refers to the origins of the type specimens in Tibet.
Description. Body length (including tegmen):3 5.8 – 5.9mm, Ƥ 6.4 – 6.5mm.
Male genitalia: Pygophore relatively short, strongly tapered to acutely rounded apex; with a long process on inner surface arising near ventral margin and directed caudally and dorsally. Connective stem about twice length of arms. Aedeagal shaft with a pair of triangular-shape dentate subapical flanges on each side, apical process with length slightly more than 1/2 length of shaft.
Diagnosis. This species is very similar to M. distiflangentus in the shape of the aedeagus but differs in the short pygophore, with a long process on the inner surface arising near ventral margin, and the aedeagal shaft is not concave along the anterodorsal margin.
Distribution. China (Tibet) ( Fig.17 View FIGURE 17 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |