Mycodrosophila neoprojectans, Wheeler & Takada, 1963
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5052.1.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:891D4264-C896-41B0-A8BC-E957B8E4F9AC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5572674 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E2A011-4D46-FFEC-F2FC-54BAE888FEFD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Mycodrosophila neoprojectans |
status |
|
Mycodrosophila neoprojectans View in CoL species group, new group
Species included and geographical distribution ( Fig. 37 View FIGURE 37 ). Mycodrosophila neoprojectans Wheeler & Takada, 1963 : Panama, Nicaragua, Honduras, Costa Rica, Trinidad, and Ecuador ( Wheeler & Takada 1963); Brazil (Amazon Biome; Santa-Brígida et al. 2019). Mycodrosophila pseudoprojectans Wheeler & Takada, 1963 : Nicaragua, Panama, and Colombia ( Wheeler & Takada 1963); Brazil (Amazon Biome; Santa-Brígida et al. 2019). Mycodrosophila hofmanni Junges, Gottschalk, Loreto & Robe, 2016 : Brazil (Amazon Biome; Junges et al. 2016). Mycodrosophila amazonica n. sp.: widely distributed in the northern region of Brazil (Amazon Biome). Mycodrosophila martinsae n. sp.: Brazil (Amazon Biome).
Diagnosis. Small flies; tergites II to IV (TII–TIV) largely black but at least partly light; dark spot below the 2nd C break extending to the vein M; dark spots at the apices of R 2+3 and R 4+5 absent (except M. amazonica n. sp. which was slightly darkened apically), ventral lobe of the epandrium tapering apically; phallus projected anteriorly in side view, with basiphallus narrower than distiphallus in lateral view (sense Grimaldi 1987).
Key to the species of the Mycodrosophila neoprojectans species group
1 Tergites V and VI mostly black, except for small light spots on lateral margins; wing tip with faint darking; basiphallus 2x narrower than distiphallus and about 1/2 of the phallus length................................... M. amazonica View in CoL n. sp.
- Tergites V and/or II to VI with more or less large light area(s); wing tip without darking............................. 2
2 Tergite VI largely black; acrostichal setulae in 10 rows; basiphallus about 1.5x narrower than distiphallus and about 1/2 of the phallus length........................................................................ M. pseudoprojectans View in CoL
- Tergite VI largely light; acrostichal setulae in 8 rows......................................................... 3
3 Tergite VI without a median dark spot; basiphallus 2x narrower than distiphallus and about 1/3 of the phallus length............................................................................................ M. martinsae View in CoL n. sp.
- Tergite VI with median dark spot......................................................................... 4
4 Halter with dark knob and light base and stem; basiphallus about 1.5x narrower than distiphallus and about 1/2 of the phallus length; postgonite 2x longer than wider in lateral view.......................................... M. neoprojectans View in CoL
- Halter fully dark; basiphallus about 1.5x narrower than distiphallus and about 1/3 of the phallus length; postgonite 3x longer than wider and backward curved in lateral view.................................................... M. hofmanni View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |