Tmarus orientalis Schenkel, 1963
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5301.1.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1A5F53A2-09C3-467F-9831-A9B99071BF6D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8016467 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E287FC-BC33-FF9D-DCDB-0430BC08AEF8 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tmarus orientalis Schenkel, 1963 |
status |
|
Tmarus orientalis Schenkel, 1963 View in CoL
Figs 10–17 View FIGURES 10–13 View FIGURES 14–17
Tmarus orientalis Schenkel, 1963: 183 View in CoL , figs 105a–b (description male). Song & Zheng 1981: 350, figs 5–8 (description female).
For full list of taxonomic references see WSC (2023).
Material examined. CHINA: Gansu Province: 2♁ 3♀, Qingshui County, Shanmen Town, Shanmen Village , 34°41′24″N, 106°21′43″E, 1630m, 24 June 2022, Zhaoyi Li leg. GoogleMaps ; 4♀, Zhang County, Xinsi Town, Heihe Forest Farm , 34°38′58″N, 104°37′33″E, 1676m, 1 July 2022, Rui Zhang leg. GoogleMaps
Diagnosis. Males of this species resemble those of T. qinlingensis Song & Wang, 1994 ( Song & Zhu 1997: 53, figs 29 A–D) in having RTA with sharp apex, but can be distinguished from the latter by the following combination of characters: (1) embolar base slightly wider than embolar tip (vs. embolar base much wider than embolar tip in T. qinlingensis ); (2) embolar tip bent downwards (vs. straight in T. qinlingensis ). Females of T. orientalis are also similar to those of T. qinlingensis in having separate copulatory openings and short, thick copulatory ducts, but can be distinguished from the latter by the following characters: (1) posterior margin of atrium not obvious (vs. Vshaped in T. qinlingensis ); (2) hood arched (vs. absence in T. qinlingensis ).
Redescription. Male: total length 4.19. Prosoma 1.76 long, 1.56 wide; opisthosoma 2.12 long, 1.35 wide. Carapace brown, with yellow markings. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.06, ALE 0.12, PME 0.08, PLE 0.09, AME–AME 0.21, AME–ALE 0.17, PME–PME 0.25, PME–PLE 0.37, AME–PME 0.33, ALE–PLE 0.23. MOA 0.33 long, front width 0.21, back width 0.25. Leg measurements: I 8.26 (2.36, 0.82, 2.06, 1.88, 1.14); II 8.06 (2.35, 0.86, 1.98, 1.79, 1.08); III 4.08 (1.22, 0.63, 1.06, 0.58, 0.59); IV 4.43 (1.51, 0.41, 1.05, 0.77, 0.69). Leg formula: 1243. Abdomen narrow and long, posteriorly wide, dorsal greyish black, with long spines and brown spots at the base of the spines.
Palp ( Figs 14–15 View FIGURES 14–17 ). VTA digitiform, with curved apex; RTA with sharp apex. Tegulum flat; spermophor visible, around the whole tegulum, with U-shape apex. Embolus thick and strong, originating from the retrolateral flank of tegulum, about ~ 3 o’clock position.
Female: total length 4.64. Prosoma 1.97 long, 1.79 wide; opisthosoma 2.67 long, 1.83 wide. Eye sizes and interdistances: AME 0.07, ALE 0.09, PME 0.15, PLE 0.12, AME–AME 0.21, AME–ALE 0.19, PME–PME 0.32, PME–PLE 0.43, AME–PME 0.34, ALE–PLE 0.32. MOA 0.34 long, front width 0.21, back width 0.32. Leg measurements: I 7.01 (1.93, 1.04, 1.68, 1.35, 1.01); II 7.04 (2.07, 1.06, 1.59, 1.40, 0.92); III 4.33 (1.32, 0.59, 1.09, 0.66, 0.67); IV 4.45 (1.55, 0.53, 0.95, 0.81, 0.61). Leg formula: 2143. Body color, shape and markings as in males.
Epigynum ( Figs 16–17 View FIGURES 14–17 ). Epigynum wider than long, with a transverse curved ridge; copulatory openings under the ridge; copulatory ducts thick and short; spermathecae reniform. Fertilisation ducts short, nearly as long as 1/4 spermathecal length.
Distribution. China (Hebei, Shandong, Shanxi, Henan, Shaanxi, Gansu), Korea.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Tmarus orientalis Schenkel, 1963
Zhang, Rui & Zhang, Feng 2023 |
Tmarus orientalis
Song, D. X. & Zheng, S. X. 1981: 350 |
Schenkel, E. 1963: 183 |