Synergus punctatus Gillette, 1896

Lobato-Vila, Irene & Pujade-Villar, Juli, 2017, Microphysogobio zhangi Sun & Zhao 2022, n. sp., Zoological Studies (Zool. Stud.) 56 (36), pp. 1-28 : 17-20

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.6620/ZS.2017.56-36

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E18788-FFF4-FFB2-FC0F-FBA4726DF94A

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Synergus punctatus Gillette
status

 

Synergus punctatus Gillette

( Figs. 6 View Fig , 8a View Fig )

Synergus punctata Gillette, 1896: 90 , 94 (ò and ñ)

Type material: Lectotype ñ deposited in NMNH (Washington D.C., USA) with the following labels: ‘Colo. 841’ (white label) / ‘Biol. 116’ (white label) / ‘Type’ (white label, handwritten) / Acc n° 71950, USNM to be loaned only to ColoAgCol’ (white label) / ‘ Synergus punctata Gill. ’ (white label bordered with two red lines, handwritten) / ‘USNM 00802265’ (white label, QR code) / ‘ Lectotype of Synergus punctatus ñ Gillette, 1896, JP-V desig-2017’ (red label). Paralecototypes (3ò and 6ñ) deposited in NMNH (Washington D.C., USA) with the following labels: ‘Colo. 841’ (white label) / ‘Biol. 116’ (white label) / ‘Type’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘Collection Ashmead’ (white label) / ‘ Synergus punctata Gill. ’ (red label, handwritten) / ‘ USNM 00960582’ (white label, QR code) / ‘ Paralectotype of Synergus punctatus ñ Gillette, 1896, JP-V desig-2017’ (red label) (1ñ); ‘Colo. 1864’ (white label) / ‘Type’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘Collection Ashmead’ (white label) / ‘ USNM 00960208’ (white label, QR code) / ‘ Paralectotype of Synergus punctatus ò Gillette, 1896, JP-V desig-2017’ (red label) (1ò); ‘Colo. 841’ (white label) / ‘Biol. 116’ (white label) / ‘Type’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘Collection Ashmead’ (white label) / ‘ USNM 00960641’ (white label, QR code) / ‘ Paralectotype of Synergus punctatus ò Gillette, 1896, JP-V desig-2017’ (red label) (1ò); ‘Colo. 843’ (white label) / ‘Biol. 117’ (white label) / ‘Type’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘Collection Ashmead’ (white label) / ‘ Synergus punctata ñ Gill.’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘ USNM 00960471’ (white label, QR code) / ‘ Paralectotype of Synergus punctatus ñ Gillette, 1896, JP-V desig-2017’ (red label) (1ñ); ‘Colo. 843’ (white label) / ‘Biol. 117’ (white label) / ‘Type’ (white label, handwritten) / Acc n° 71950, USNM to be loaned only to ColoAgCol’ (white label) / ‘ USNM 00960234’ (white label, QR code) / ‘ Paralectotype of Synergus punctatus ñ Gillette, 1896, JP-V desig-2017’ (red label) (1ñ); ‘Colo. 1864’ (white label) / ‘Type’ (white label, handwritten) / Acc n° 71950, USNM to be loaned only to ColoAgCol’ (white label) / ‘ USNM 00960481’ (white label, QR code) / ‘ Paralectotype of Synergus punctatus ñ Gillette, 1896, JP-V desig-2017’ (red label) (1ñ); ‘Colo. 1864’ (white label) / ‘Type’ (white label, handwritten) / Acc n° 71950, USNM to be loaned only to ColoAgCol’ (white label) / ‘ USNM 00960708’ (white label, QR code) / ‘ Paralectotype of Synergus punctatus ñ Gillette, 1896, JP-V desig-2017’ (red label) (1ñ); ‘Colo. 1722’ (white label) / ‘Type’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘Coll. CF Baker’ (white label), ‘ USNM 00960567’ (white label, QR code) / ‘ Paralectotype of Synergus punctatus ò Gillette, 1896, JP-V desig-2017’ (red label) (1ò); ‘Colo. 1719’ (white label) / ‘Type’ (white label, handwritten) / ‘Coll. CF Baker’ (white label), ‘ USNM 00960892’ (white label, QR code) / ‘ Paralectotype of Synergus punctatus ò Gillette, 1896, JP-V desig-2017’ (red label) (1ñ).

Additional material: Col. CF Baker (1ò and 5ñ) with the following QR codes: 00960262 (ñ), 00960464 (ñ), 00960565 (ñ), 00960598 (ñ), 00960742 (ñ) and 00960874 (ò); Col. Ashmead (1ñ) with the following QR code: 00960652.

Comments: According to Gillette (1896: 94), this species was described based on 24 females and 22 males. We located 4 males and 10 females in the NMNH from Ashmead and Baker’s collections; 3ò and 6ñ have similar labels to the ones of the Lectotype and a handwritten label with the word ‘type’. So, we assume these specimens belong to the typical series. Baker’s material mentioned in ‘Additional material’ probably belongs to the typical series too, but the ‘type’ label is missing.

Synergus punctatus has partially smooth mesopleurae (striae are not extended into the speculum) as all the species mentioned in this study. Synergus punctatus is closely related to S. gilletti because females of both species have head and body coloration entirely black, except for a light halo around the mouth; also, both sexes of these two species have frontal carinae, the mesoscutum with weak transverse carinae, the scutellum wrinkled with the circumscutellar carina not visible and the metasomal punctuation forming a wide band, amongst others (see the differences between these species in the diagnosis of S. gilletti ). On the contrary, S. punctatus mainly differs from S. cibriani , S. citriformis (= S. elegans ), S. laticephalus , S. longimalaris and S. striatifrons sp. nov. by having frontal carinae (absent in all these species), the mesosoma with a few weak transverse carinae (coriaceous or weakly imbricated in all these species), the circumscutellar carina not visible (visible in all these species), a wide band of micropunctures in the metasomal syntergite (no punctures or only forming a posterodorsal patch in all these species), and body coloration entirely black in females, except for a yellow and well defined halo around the mouth (other coloration in all these species).

Short description: Synergus punctatus is characterized by the following combination of morphological traits: in females, body and head black, except for a yellow and well-defined halo around the mouth ( Fig. 8a View Fig ); in males, head yellow except for a black spot in the vertex. Frons and vertex coriaceous, without punctures ( Figs. 6a, b, c View Fig ). Frontal carinae weak but visible, incomplete and not branched ( Figs. 6b, c View Fig ). Female antennae 14-segmented, F1 just slightly longer than F2 ( Fig. 6f View Fig ); in males, F1 about 1.4 times longer than F2, curved, medially excavated, more expanded distally ( Fig. 6b View Fig ). Mesoescutum ( Fig. 6d View Fig ) weakly but densely transversely carinated; notauli inconspicuous in the anterior third of the scutum; mesopleurae ( Fig. 6g View Fig ) transversely striated, speculum smooth. Scutellum ( Fig. 6d View Fig ) wrinkled; circumscutellar carina not visible. Metasomal syntergite punctuation forming a band, occupying the distal half of the syntergite and reaching the ventral part of metasoma; not incised dorso-distally ( Fig. 6h View Fig ). Tarsal claws with a small basal tooth ( Fig. 6e View Fig ). Radial cell closed, 2.5 times longer than wide.

Distribution: USA: Manitou, Colorado ( Gillette, 1896); Stanford, California ( McCracken and Egbert 1922).

Biology: According to Gillette (1896) and McCracken and Egbert (1922), this species is related to the galls of Disholcaspis rubens (Gillette) , Disholcaspis eldoradensis (Beutenmüller) and Biorhiza eburnea (Bassett) (= Dryophanta glabra Gillette ), always reared from oak species from Quercus section: Q. arizonica , Q. dumosa , Q. gambelii , Q. garryana , Q. lobata , Q. oblongifolia , Q. reticulata , Q. submollis , Q. toumeyi , Q. turbinella and Q. undulata .

NMNH

Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History

USNM

Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Cynipidae

Genus

Synergus

Loc

Synergus punctatus Gillette

Lobato-Vila, Irene & Pujade-Villar, Juli 2017
2017
Loc

Synergus punctata

Gillette CP 1896: 90
1896
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF