Odontoscelio striatifrons Kieffer, 1905
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.739.1267 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7ED4955F-04B7-41A8-A6A5-9666A300E359 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4610814 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E0893A-1637-D404-6B16-FA76FC297F8A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Odontoscelio striatifrons Kieffer, 1905 |
status |
|
Odontoscelio striatifrons Kieffer, 1905
Odontoscelio striatifrons Kieffer, 1905: 14 (holotype, ♂, MCSN).
Odontoscelio striatifrons – Kieffer 1926: 350 (description). — Bin 1974: 457 (type information).
Material examined
Holotype (images only) GUINEA BISSAU • 1 ♂; Bolama [labelled: Bolama, Portuguese Guinea]; Jun.–Dec.1899; L. Fea leg.; MCSN.
Redescription
Male
BODY LENGTH. 5.7 mm.
COLOUR ( Figs 17 View Fig , 18A–E View Fig ). Body black; tegula and mandibles brown; coxa black and remainder of leg brown; radicle brown, remaining antennomeres dark brown.
HEAD ( Figs 17 View Fig , 18A, C–D View Fig ). Head 1.19 × as wide as high, 1.9 × as high as long; IOS 0.61 × head width, 1.23× eye length; OOL>POL in ratio of 29.4: 22.0 (LOL not visible in the image); OOL 3.34 × OD; eye (L: W = 68.1: 40.2) setose; frons with oblique carinae directed towards anterior ocellus; space between carinae smooth with long brown setae; vertex and interocellar area smooth with sparse setigerous punctae; interantennal process rectangular, smooth with a medial longitudinal carina; occiput entirely smooth with sparse setigerous punctae, except for a small patch of dense setigerous foveae medially; gena longitudinally carinate with setigerous punctae; ocelli raised above surface of vertex; antennomeres not clearly visible.
MESOSOMA ( Figs 17 View Fig , 18A, C View Fig ). Cervical pronotal area transversely carinate; mesoscutum (L:W = 104.4:127.9) laterally smooth with setigerous punctae, anteromedial ¾ areolate, remaining ¼ smooth with sparse longitudinal carinae; adjoining this medial patch, longitudinal carinae extend for almost entire length of mesoscutum; mesoscutum laterally smooth with sparse areolae and setigerous punctae; pronotal shoulders with a blunt spine visible when viewed dorsally; lateral pronotal area anteriorly foveate; posteroventral margin of lateral pronotal area extending as a blunt spine; netrion foveate; dorsal mesopleuron with a small triangular rugose patch beneath tegula; mesopleural pit distinct; speculum with weak transverse carinae; mesepimeral sulcus not foveate; posteroventral femoral depression with transverse carinae; episternum and ventral mesopleuron densely setose, obscuring sculpture; metapleuron anteriorly and ventrally densely setose, remainder with large depressions; scutoscutellar sulcus laterally with large foveae; mesoscutellum (L:W = 36.7: 88.2) areolate; a median keel present; metascutellum foveate and posteromedially with a triangular spine, metanotal trough foveate; lateral propodeal area laterally densely setose, remainder smooth, except for foveae present along posterior margin; lateral propodeal area extending posterolaterally as a blunt straight spine. Fore wing (L:W = 142: 45) and hind wing (L: W = 122:30) weakly infuscate.
METASOMA ( Figs 17 View Fig , 18B View Fig ). L:W = 251.2: 140.3; T1 longitudinally costate, space between costae weakly foveate; T2 with basal foveae, remainder longitudinally costate, space between costae smooth; T3 longitudinally costate on anterior 4 /5, sublaterally areolate, and laterally, posteromedially and posteriorly smooth; space between costae with small foveae medially; T4 medially smooth, setose, remainder with setigerous foveae; T5 and T6 predominantly with setigerous foveae; T7 setose; T1 and T2 with sparse long setae laterally, T3–T6 densely setose laterally; length and width of tergites T1–T 7 in ratio of 46.3: 37.8, 62.2: 51.2, 72.0: 115.8, 37.8:136.5, 19.5: 101.2, 11.0: 60.9, 73.2:36.5, respectively.
Remarks
Kieffer erroneously referred to the holotype as a female specimen in his type information, although later in the description of the genus he stated that females are unknown.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Odontoscelio striatifrons Kieffer, 1905
Veenakumari, Kamalanathan & Mohanraj, Prashanth 2021 |
Odontoscelio striatifrons
Bin F. 1974: 457 |
Kieffer J. J. 1926: 350 |
Odontoscelio striatifrons
Kieffer J. J. 1905: 14 |