Mexentypesa hidalguensis, Salinas-Velasco & Valdez-Mondragón & Villegas, 2024

Salinas-Velasco, Héctor Vicente, Valdez-Mondragón, Alejandro & Villegas, Julián Bueno-, 2024, A new species of the spider genus Mexentypesa Raven (Araneae: Nemesiidae) from Hidalgo, Mexico and taxonomic comments on M. chiapas Raven, Zootaxa 5453 (2), pp. 233-244 : 235-241

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5453.2.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DC7283A1-7BB1-4FD4-83FA-7F8A8779AD7E

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11245162

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E087A9-BE4B-FFFB-FF6F-FE1EFD2FA2F5

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Mexentypesa hidalguensis
status

sp. nov.

Mexentypesa hidalguensis sp. nov.

Figures 1–27 View FIGURES 1–4 View FIGURES 5–12 View FIGURES 13–21 View FIGURES 22–25 View FIGURES 26–27

Type material. MEXICO: Hidalgo: 1 ♂ holotype (CNAN-T01589) , 1 ♂, 1 ♀ paratypes (CNAN-T01590, CNANT01591) from La Mojonera (lat 20.626111°, lon -98.618611°, 2040 m), Municipio Zacualtipán de Ángeles , 27.vii.2021, H. V. Salinas-Velasco Col. Daytime collection .

Etymology. The specific epithet is a noun in apposition, in reference to the state where the type locality is found: Hidalgo, in central Mexico.

Diagnosis. Males of M. hidalguensis sp. nov. are easily distinguished from M. chiapas by having a shorter embolus ( Figs 8–12 View FIGURES 5–12 ), larger in M. chiapas , reaching the level of the joint patella-tibia of the palp ( Figs 32, 33, 34, 36 View FIGURES 32–36 ). Massive ventral and prolateral spines on the palpal tibiae are fewer in the new species ( Figs 9, 10, 12 View FIGURES 5–12 ) than in M. chiapas , which also have one located basally to the tibia ( Figs 32, 34, 35 View FIGURES 32–36 ). Each endites in the new species has a patch of 4–6 small cuspules on proximal inner part ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 5–12 ), whereas a patch of 11–13 small cuspules on each endite in M. chiapas ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 37–44 ). The new species has a total of 10 spines on tibia I: 2 retrolateral, 7 ventral, and 1 ventralretrolateral ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 13–21 ), whereas M. chiapas has only 7 spines and a massive spine on tibia I ( Fig. 37 View FIGURES 37–44 ). Carapace and opisthosomal coloration patterns in the new species ( Figs 1, 2 View FIGURES 1–4 ) differ from M. chiapas ( Figs 28, 30 View FIGURES 28–31 ). Females also differ in seminal receptacles; in M. hidalguensis sp. nov., seminal receptacles are widely separated from each other ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 22–25 ), whereas in M. chiapas they are close together to each other ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 37–44 ). Females of the new species further differ from M. chiapas by the presence of rastellum on the chelicerae and the absence of granules on them. In addition, females of the new species has a well-defined scopula on all tarsi, especially on the pedipalp.

Description. Male (holotype) (CNAN-T01589): Measurements: Total length (prosoma + opisthosoma) 9.50. Carapace 3.70 long, 3.30 wide. Clypeus length 0.20. Diameter of AME 0.16, ALE 0.20, PME 0.16, PLE 0.18. Labium: LBl 0.25, LBw 0.63. Sternum: STRl 2.10, STRw 1.70. Leg lengths: I femur 2.00/ patella 1.50/ tibia 1.50/ metatarsus 1.10/ tarsus 1.03/ total 7.13; II- 2.00/ 1.50/ 1.50/ 1.10/ 1.10/ 7.20; III- 4.03/ 1.06/ 1.10/ 1.50/ 1.02/ 8.71; IV- 2.51/ 1.30/ 1.50/ 2.70/ 1.50/ 9.51. Leg formula: 4-3-2-1. Prosoma: Carapace longer than wide, with a setose surface, pyriform-shaped, dark brown coloration ( Figs 1, 2 View FIGURES 1–4 ). Ocular region over a tubercle ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 5–12 ). Foveal groove slightly deep ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1–4 ). AER slightly procurved, PER slightly recurved ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 5–12 ). Largest ALE, smallest AME ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 5–12 ). Sternum longer than wide, nonagonal-shaped, reddish brown, more setose towards posterior margin, without sigilla ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1–4 ). Labium wider than long, reddish brown, with long setae anteriorly, without cuspules ( Figs 4 View FIGURES 1–4 , 7 View FIGURES 5–12 ). Endites long with only few setae, with a patch of 4–7 small cuspules on proximal inner part on each endite ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 5–12 ). Endites with a prolateral conical apophysis. Chelicerae: Promargin furrow with 6 teeth, retromargin furrow with single row of very long setae. Rastellum consists of numerous long, thick setae, but without stout spines (arrow, Fig. 6 View FIGURES 5–12 ). Opisthosoma: Longer than wide, setose, dark brown, with irregular light brown pattern dorsally; ventrally with brown undefined spots, close to spinnerets and lungs ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1–4 ). Spinnerets dark brown. PMS small and rounded apically, single segment, with spigots. PLS long and conical apically: basal segment length = median segment> distal segment. Legs: Well-developed scopulae on all legs ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 13–21 ). Tarsi with trichobothria: Tarsi I–IV: slightly staggered dorsal row with 12 trichobothria each, distal ones becoming larger; Legs spination pattern: Tibiae I: v(2+2+2+2) (one of the last spines ventral-retrolaterally is massive) (Figs 13,14,17), p(2+2) (larger than v); tibiae II: v(2+2+2+2), p(2); metatarsi I: v(2); metatarsi II: v(2+2+2), p(2+2). Leg III and IV spination pattern is illustrated in Figure 14 View FIGURES 13–21 . Pedipalps: Articles dark brown, slender, femora and tibiae with long setae ventrally and dorsally ( Figs 8, 10 View FIGURES 5–12 ). Patellae with three distal ventral-prolateral spines. Tibiae with two massive ventral and one prolateral spines ( Figs 9, 12 View FIGURES 5–12 ). Cymbium with six dorsoapical spines ( Figs 10, 12 View FIGURES 5–12 ). Bulb pyriform, turned ventrally toward a concavity on ventral part of tibiae ( Figs 10–12 View FIGURES 5–12 ). Embolus long, slender, and sigmoidal, almost the same length as tibiae ( Figs 8–12 View FIGURES 5–12 ).

Description. Female (CNAN-T01591). Similar to the male, differences: Measurements: Total length (prosoma + opisthosoma) 13.00. Carapace 6.50 long, 4.50 wide. Clypeus length 0.30. Diameter of AME 0.19, ALE 0.23, PME 0.19, PLE 0.21. Labium: LBl 0.28, LBw 0.66. Sternum: STRl 2.20, STRw 2.00. Leg lengths: I femur 2.70/ patella 1.50/ tibia 1.60/ metatarsus 1.50/ tarsus 1.50/ total 8.80; II- 2.50/ 1.50/ 1.60/ 1.50/ 1.00/ 8.10; III- 2.00/ 1.50/ 1.50/ 2.00/ 1.25/ 8.25; IV- 2.50/ 1.50/ 2.00/ 2.50/ 1.50/ 10.00. Leg formula: 4-1-3-2. Prosoma: Carapace longer than wide, with surface smooth, setose, pyriform-shaped, dark brown coloration ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 22–25 ). Ocular region slightly elevated. Foveal groove slightly deep. AER slightly procurved, PER slightly recurved. Largest ALE, smallest AME. Sternum longer than wide, nonagonal-shaped, reddish brown, more setose towards posterior margin, without sigilla. Labium wider than long, reddish brown, with long setae anteriorly, without cuspules. Endites long setose, with a patch of 4–6 small cuspules on proximal inner part on each endite ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 22–25 ). Chelicerae: Promargin furrow with 6 teeth, retromargin furrow with single row of very long setae. Rastellum consists of numerous long, thick setae, but without stout spines. Opisthosoma: Longer than wide, setose, dark brown, without irregular light brown pattern dorsally; ventrally dark brown without any pattern ( Figs 22, 24 View FIGURES 22–25 ). Spinnerets dark brown. PMS small and rounded apically, single segment, with spigots. PLS long and conical apically: basal segment length> median segment <distal segment ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 22–25 ). Legs: Light tarsal scopulae on all legs. Tarsi with trichobothria: Tarsi I–IV: slightly staggered dorsal row with 12 trichobothria each, distal ones becoming larger; Leg spination patterns: Tibiae I: v(2+2); tibiae II: v (2+2+2), p(2+2+2); tibiae III and IV: v(3+3+3), p(2+2+2); metatarsi I and II: v(2+1); metatarsi III and IV: v(2+2+2), p(2+2); all tarsi: without spines. Pedipalps: Articles stouter and darker coloration than in male, setose, with long and dense scopulae on tarsi. Tarsi with two claws; spination pattern: v(2+1). Genital area: Flat, halfmoonshaped, setose, dark brown color. Two thin seminal receptacles, poorly sclerotized ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 22–25 ).

Variation. Females are darker than males. Males (N = 2): Cl 3.50–3.70, 3.60±0.10; Cw 3.12–3.3, 3.21±0.09; STRl 1.98–2.10, 2.04±0.60; STRw 1.60–1.70, 1.65±0.05; PTl 1.29–1.37, 1.33±0.08; PTw 0.47–0.50, 0.48±0.20; Tibiae I (length): 1.78–1.93, 1.85±0.80. No differences were found in the position of the spines on tibia I, the palp tibia spines, or the spines on the Cy between both observed individuals ( Figs 13, 14 View FIGURES 13–21 ).

Natural History. Holotype and paratypes were collected in a cloud forest near La Mojonera, Hidalgo, Mexico ( Fig. 26, 27 View FIGURES 26–27 ). Manual collection is likely the most effective method. No specimens have been observed outside of decaying logs (saproxylic habits) where they construct their burrows, which consist of a silk-lined sac with multiple layers, featuring only a single entrance that is slightly smaller than the extended spider. These egg-sacs are typically found at a depth ranging of 5–15 cm (measured from the bark towards the interior of the log). These spiders can be collected throughout the year, with a higher likelihood of abundance between the months of August to November .

Distribution. MEXICO: Hidalgo ( Fig. 45 View FIGURE 45 ).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Nemesiidae

Genus

Mexentypesa

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF