Trypanosoma spp
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2019.04.009 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03E02F29-FFAA-FFC8-FCE4-5329FE7EB83E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Trypanosoma spp |
status |
|
3.2. Sequence analysis of Trypanosoma spp .
Sequence analysis of gGAPDH revealed the presence of two distinct sequence types. The gGAPDH sequence type 1 from the samples ZB17- 105, −111, and −115 (GenBank no. LC415422) showed 97.0% (555/ 572 bp) identity with the T. conorhini isolate TCC2156, which was detected from a triatomine ( Triatomia rubrofasciata ) of Hawaii (GenBank no. MF144731) ( Espinosa-Álvarez et al., 2018). The sequence type 2 from the samples ZB17-108 and −109 (GenBank no. LC415423) showed 94.2% (539/572 bp) identity with the T. dionisii isolate TryCC495 from a bat ( Carollia perspicillata ) in Brazil (GenBank no. GQ140363) ( Cavazzana et al., 2010).
The same grouping was obtained by the sequence analysis of 18S rRNA. The 18S rRNA gene of the sequence type 1 from the samples ZB17-105, −111, and −115 (GenBank no. LC415424) showed 97.7% (1074/1099 bp) identity with Trypanosoma sp. isolate NanDoum1 from the African palm civet (N. binotata) in Cameroon (GenBank no. FM202492) ( Hamilton et al., 2009). The sequence type 2 from the samples ZB17-108 and −109 (GenBank no. LC415425) showed 95.2% (1033/1084 bp) identity with the T. dionisii isolate P3 from a bat ( Pipistrellus pipistrellus ) captured in the United Kingdom (GenBank no. AJ009151) ( Stevens et al., 1998).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |