Diplodiscus spp
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2022.07.009 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DD4135-AE1A-075D-FC8A-FCD4FE7FFD6F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Diplodiscus spp |
status |
|
3.4. Diversity and mutation rate among Diplodiscus spp . Mitogenomes
To determine the highly conserved and variable mitochondrial genes among 11 Paramphistomoidea trematodes, a sliding window analysis was conducted by the concatenated nucleotide sequence of 12 PCGs. The results showed obvious differences in 12 PCGs of 11 Paramphistomoidea trematodes. By computing the number of variable positions per unit
15
length of gene, the curve indicated that cox 1 was the lowest variable gene, while nad 2, nad 4, nad 5 and cox 3 showed high sequence divergence ( Fig. 4 View Fig ). The gene cox 1 was considered to be a useful barcode for metazoans, and widely employed for trematode studies ( Hebert et al., 2003; Brabec et al., 2015). The mitochondrial genes cox 1 has also been used to study the population genetic structure of Diplostomum spp. on a local and global scale ( Brabec et al., 2015). As shown in Fig. 5 View Fig , non-synonymous/synonymous (dN/dS) mutation rates among the 12 PCGs of the three Diplodiscus mitogenomes were analyzed. It was clearly showed that all PCGs were under negative (purifying) selection (dN/dS <0.5), and cox 1 had the lowest dN/dS value in 12 PCGs, which was similar with Gyrodactylus derjavinoides reported by Huyse et al. (2008). Because the stronger purification selection pressure has the smaller value of dN/dS, which further corroborates that cox 1 has higher synonymous variation. Additionally, the relatively looser selection pressure (0.3 <dN/dS <0.5), which may due to the accu-mulation of non-synonymous substitutions. These results suggest that the cox 1 gene should be considered as optimal candidates for genetic marker to be used for population genetics and species identification studies in the superfamily Paramphistomoidea species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.