Cleome ornithopodioides Linnaeus (1753: 672)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.496.1.2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6495642 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DD227F-FC16-0613-FF1C-F946A5756762 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Cleome ornithopodioides Linnaeus (1753: 672) |
status |
|
14. Cleome ornithopodioides Linnaeus (1753: 672) View in CoL .
Lectotype (designated by Meikle 1977): LINN HL850.18 [photo!] (isolectotype: BM barcode BM000646389 [photo!]).
Homotypic synonym: Micambe ornithopodioides (Linnaeus) Medikus (1789: 43) .— Hemiscola ornithopoides Rafinesque (1838: 111) , nom. nud.
Heterotypic synonyms: Cleome dilleniana Candolle (1824: 240) . Type: “in Oriente. Dill. Elth. T. 266. C. ornithopodioides auctorum excl. Buxb. syn.” (holotype: GDC barcodes G00207100 + G00207101 [photo!]).— Cleome aurea Čelakovský (1884: 113) . Type: [ Greece]. Turciae in peninsula Athos ad claustrum Chilandar in arvis et arenosis, 1884, S. Breuer s.n. (lectotype, designated here: PR barcode PR154920 [photo!]).— Cleome cypria Čelakovský (1884: 114) . Type: [ Cyprus]. In vinetis prope Galata, 15 Jun. 1880, P. Sintenis & G. Rigo 812 (lectotype, designated here: PR barcode PR154979 [photo!]; isolectotypes: BR barcode BR0000006985875 [photo!], K barcodes K000643950!, K000643951!, K000643952! & K000643953!, K! [no barcode], LD, P barcodes P05360091!, P05360113! & P05360172!). Cleome ornithopodioides Linnaeus subsp. cypria (Čelakovský) Holmboe (1914: 93) .— Cleome macedonica Heldreich ex Nadji (1892: 11) . Type: Macedonia: in petrosis ad Taschlek deressi prope Thessalonicam, L. Charrel 1115 (lectotype, designated here: JE barcode JE00007266 [photo!]; isolectotypes: GE [photo!], K barcodes K000643954! & K000643955!, P barcodes P05418723!, P05418727!, P05418728! & P05418732!, PR barcode PR154921, WIS barcodes WIS0259054! & WIS0259055!).
Note 1: The type material of C. dilleniana includes two plants mounted together on one sheet but individually barcoded. These are presumed, in combination, to represent the holotype.
Note 2: Čelakovský types are presumed to be at PR, but as C. aurea did not have a holotype explicitly designated, the PR specimen is designated as the lectotype. It is not clear if there are more specimens of this collection in other herbaria .
Note 3: As with Note 2, Čelakovský types are presumed to be at PR, but as C. cypria did not have a holotype explicitly designated, the PR specimen is designated as the lectotype .
Geographic distribution: Greece, Macedonia, Turkey, Cyprus.
LINN |
Linnean Society of London |
BM |
Bristol Museum |
PR |
National Museum in Prague |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.