Phausis marina Fender, 1966
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5458.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7480BACF-7F14-48C2-80CB-AB4C54812D10 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11373078 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DCFA33-FFB9-FFDC-7DB2-578555E5FEBE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Phausis marina Fender, 1966 |
status |
|
Phausis marina Fender, 1966 View in CoL
( Figs 10 View FIGURE 10 ; 17F View FIGURE 17 ; 22P–R View FIGURE 22 ; 23D View FIGURE 23 ; 24F View FIGURE 24 )
Podabrus marina Fender 1966: 91 View in CoL missapplied; typographical error
Diagnosis. Male. Phausis marina can be distinguished from its congeners by the following characters: head vertex more shallowly compressed than congeners; clypeus testaceous; body overall dark brown to castaneus; anterior vitreous areas (pronotal spots) small and remote ( Fig. 17F View FIGURE 17 ); antennae more compressed than congeners; abdominal segment VIII apical margin bi-lobed.
Redescription. Male ( Figs. 17F View FIGURE 17 ; 22P–R View FIGURE 22 ; 23D View FIGURE 23 ). Length 5.0–6.0 mm. Width 1.5–1.7 mm. Color. Body dark brown to castaneus; eyes brown; mouthparts brown except apical half of clypeus which testaceous; mandibles and apices of last maxillary palp testaceous or paler than other mouthparts; antennae castaneus; pronotum fulvus to brunneous with apical margins flavus to pale brown; central pronotal disc brunneous; scutellum castaneus; thorax overall brunneous, with margins and upper portions paler than thorax; apices of coxae, trochanters, femora, paler than rest of leg; tarsi not paler than other leg segments; lateral margins of elytra not paler than elytral disc; abdomen dark brown to castaneus with lateral and posterior margins of abdominal segments VII and VIII paler; photic organs absent on abdominal segments VI,VII and VIII; pubescence aureus to brown. Anterior vitreous areas (pronotal spots) present.
Head small and transverse (frontal view); vertex shallowly transversely concave with fine, dense punctures dorsally. Eyes small and separated, labium not obstructed postventrally.. Mandibles long (more than apices of mandibles crossing frontally), robust basally becoming abruptly strongly tapered, beginning to taper at half the length of the mandible; incisor region less than half of the total length of mandible; outer margin straight versus straight as in other Phausis taxa; basal angle approximately 90 degrees dorsally. Maxillary palps with three palpomeres, last palpomere securiform. Labial palps reduced, with two palpomeres.
Antennae filiform, long, extending to middle of metathorax ( Fig. 17F View FIGURE 17 ). Scape 2.0×longer than pedicel. Pedicel approximately 1/3 the length of antennomere 3. Antennomere 3 approximately as long as antennomeres 4 to 10. Antennomeres 4 to 11 approximately same size and length. Antennomere 11 slightly longer than previous antennomeres, roundly truncated at apex. Flagellomeres compressed, but not as compressed as in Lucidota or Ellychnia ; when viewed laterally, flagellomeres are wider than in ventral view. Sensorium present on the distal end of antennomere 11, semi-transparent, small, and round.
Pronotum elongate (wider than long), semicircular ( Fig. 17F View FIGURE 17 ); longitudinal median carina present, extending 3/4 of pronotal length; lateral and apical margin evenly rounded; all margins weakly reflexed, more reflexed along sides and anterior margin, becoming flattened toward the hind angles; basal margin weakly undulate, appearing almost straight; hind angles strongly dentate. Central pronotal disc present; quadrate, shiny, sparsely punctured laterally. Anterior vitreous areas (spots) present, small (more than one width of spot between them), elliptical, and punctate around outer margins of vitreous areas only.
Scutellum rhombus ( Fig. 17F View FIGURE 17 ); sides curving inward and posterior apex notched without longitudinal groove; surface shiny and finely punctate.
Elytra well developed; punctate to reticulate basally, becoming coarser medially, and irregularly punctate to rugose apically ( Fig. 17F View FIGURE 17 ). One to two costae present medially on each elytron; arising from basal half of elytra and extending approximately to elytral apices. Longitudinal elevated and transverse lines weakly present.
Venter. Thorax subelongate and rhomboidal. Metathorax without posterior apex notched; medial line present; surface shiny, mostly impunctate with a few sparse punctures. Tergal apicolateral angles lobed, but not as prominent as in other taxa within the genus. Abdominal segments VI and VII not bearing photic organs. Photic organ absent on abdominal segment VIII. Abdominal segment VII elongate (longer than wide), apical margin emarginated. Abdominal segment VIII same as abdominal segment VII except apical margin bilobed.
Male Genitalia. Basal piece (dorsal view; Fig. 22P View FIGURE 22 ) wider than long, c-shaped and moderately sclerotized (light brown); distinct segments divergent, widely separated. Median lobe (dorsal view; Fig. 22P View FIGURE 22 ) exceeds tips of parameres, overall shape lanceolate and acutely rounded (less than 45 degrees) at apex; parallel to parameres; sensilla absent; dorsal inner-basal margins bifurcate; dorsal opening absent; longitudinal dorsal carina present; lateral line absent; ventral opening present ( Fig. 22R View FIGURE 22 ), subtriangular, consisting of the apical fourth of medial lobe. Parameres (dorsal view; Fig. 22P View FIGURE 22 ) robust, wide, with almost parallel lateral margins; inner lateral margins convex; outer lateral margins parallel; apex round (lateral view; Fig. 22Q View FIGURE 22 ); proximal flanges (extensions of parameres that curve or extend outward from inner margin) absent (dorsal view). Sensilla present, sparse along proximal apical margins (ventral view). Number of sensilla vary from 1 to 3, if absent then a pore can be seen ( Fig. 23D View FIGURE 23 ).
Female. Unknown.
Larva. Unknown.
Eggs. Unknown.
Etymology. Unknown.
Specimens Examined. Type Material. Holotype ( Figs. 17F View FIGURE 17 ; 24F View FIGURE 24 ). USA: CALIFORNIA: “ Mill Valley , MARION Co., Cal., 7. VI.49, H.B. Leech Collector, in house, California Academy of Sciences Type No 16802, 1 ♂ ( CAS). Paratypes. “Mill Valley, MARION Co. Cal. 4.VII.1957, H.B. Leech Collector, Phausis marina Fend. Paratype”, 1 ♂ ( OSAC); “Mill Valley, MARION Co. Cal. 4.V.1958, H.B. Leech Collector, Kenneth M Fender Collection 1988 and 1992, Gifts to the California Academy of Sciences, Phausis marina Fend. Paratype ”, 1 ♂ ( CAS); “Mill Valley, MARION Co. Cal. 4.VI.1957, H.B. Leech Collector, Kenneth M Fender Collection 1988 and 1992, Gifts to the California Academy of Sciences, Phausis marina Fend. Paratype ”, 1 male ( CAS) .
Other material. USA: CALIFORNIA: HUMBOLDT Co., Fieldbrook , 9.VII .1969 , Coll. R. P. Allen, Det. J.E. Lloyd, 1 ♂ ( CAS); MARION Co., 1 air mi. W. Inverness , 22.VI .1976 , berlese ex. Litter Alnus rubra, Coll. Doyen, Det. A.M. Hodson , 1 ♂ (EMEC); same except Inverness , 26.VI .1958 , Coll. Toschi, Det. A.M. Hodson, 1 ♂ (EMEC).
Distribution. Only known to occur in California, United States of America ( Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ).
Phenology. Occurs May to early July.
Remarks. The genus name is stated as the genus Podabrus rather than Phausis ( Fender 1966) . This was found to be a typographical error by the original author. The incorrect genus epithet refers to the genus Podabrus Westwood 1838 ( Poole & Gentili 1997) in the family Cantharidae (Order: Coleoptera ) and bears no resemblance to Phausis ( Coleoptera : Lampyridae ). Fender (1966) mentions that the legs of this species are “compressed, more slender than usual for genus”. This character was examined and found in some but not all specimens of Phausis marina including paratypes, and also in some specimens of Phausis riversi .
Variation. The color of the pronotum can vary between brunneous or flavus within this species.
Biology. Unknown.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Phausis marina Fender, 1966
Hodson, Alicia M. & Branham, Marc A. 2024 |
Podabrus marina
Fender, K. M. 1966: 91 |