Hammerschmidtiella Chitwood, 1932
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.279226 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6188563 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DCB46A-FF89-FF8E-EA8C-7EEAFA15F921 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hammerschmidtiella Chitwood, 1932 |
status |
|
Key to all known species of Hammerschmidtiella Chitwood, 1932
1. Presence of pear-shaped eggs......................................... H. hochi Jex, Schneider, Rose & Cribb, 2005
- Oval eggs or ovoid eggs that are flattened on one side.........................................................2
2(1). Male with multiple crest or ridges behind anus........................................ H. cristata Spiridonov, 1984
- Multiple crest or ridges behind anus absent in male...........................................................3
3(2). Presence of highly curved corpus over end bulb in female oesophagus.................... H. poinari Gupta & Kaur, 1978
- Corpus not curved in female oesophagus................................................................... 4
4(3). Vulva provided with three cuticularised plates......................................... .. basiri Singh & Kaur, 1988
- Vulva without plates................................................................................... 5
5(4). Caudal papillae and spicule present in male................................................................. 6
- Caudal papillae and spicule absent in male................................. H. aspiculus Biswas & Chakravarty, 1963
6(5). Spicule=18µm long....................................................................................7
- Spicule more than 18µm long............................................................................ 9
7(6). Female= 1.926–2.022mm long.......................................................... H. acreana Kloss, 1966
- Female more than 2.022mm long......................................................................... 8
8(7). Female= 2.20–3.77mm and tail= 0.250–0.290mm; male= 0.520–0.560mm ............................................................................................ H. mackenziei (Zervos, 1987) Adamson & Van Waerebeke, 1992
- Female=3.0– 3.33mm and tail 0.78mm; male= 0.81–0.96 mm ................................. H. manohari Rao, 1958
9(6). Female= 1.81mm long; spicule=20µm long............................................ H. singhi Rao & Rao, 1965
- Female=more than 1.81mm long; spicule=more than 20µm long...............................................10
10(9). Male= 0.487–0.853mm long.................................... H. diesingi ( Hammerschmidt, 1838) Chitwood, 1932
- Male = more than 0.853mm long........................................................................ 11
11(10). Caudal papillae in male=5pairs, gubernaculum present........................ .. H. andersoni Adamson & Nasher, 1987
- Caudal papillae = 3 pairs, gubernaculum absent.................................... H. nayrai Serrano Sanchez, 1945
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |