Crepidula protea Orbigny, 1841
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.1112.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6113143E-CCCD-48FB-BEEB-B67B2CBC0BAF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5057739 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DBF911-FFFB-FFB8-FEFC-F95C4B7FFD8E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Crepidula protea Orbigny, 1841 |
status |
|
Crepidula protea Orbigny, 1841 View in CoL
(Figs. 16–18, 111)
Synonymy see Simone (2002: 32). Complement:
Crepidula protea: Simone et al. 2000: 139–140 View in CoL (figs. 22–27); Simone 2002: 32–36 (Figs. 5, 6, 63, 64, 141–151).
The description of this species is accurate in Simone (2002), including the synonymy. The single addition is the presence of the odontophore muscle pair m12, and the female genital papilla folds fashion (Fig. 111), both similar to those described by C. intratesta View in CoL .
Additional material examined: BRAZIL; Rio Grande do Sul; off Sarita , ANSP 244118 About ANSP . 5 shells (Fishing boats col. 1959. E.C. Rios leg.) ; off Rio Grande , 32º30S 52º00W, ANSP 355327 About ANSP , 35 specimens (voucher material of Hoagland; Hoagland, Hoagland & Davis col., 20/xii/1981) GoogleMaps . URUGUAY; Rocha; La Paloma , 34º40S 54º09W, ANSP 410440 About ANSP , 2 About ANSP shells (Naide & Naide col., iii/1959; E.I.Duarte leg.) GoogleMaps ; off Maldonado, ANSP 220712 About ANSP , 1 About ANSP shell (B.R. Bales col.; 1958) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Crepidula protea Orbigny, 1841
Simone, Luiz Ricardo L. 2006 |
Crepidula protea:
Simone, L. R. L. 2002: 32 |
Simone, L. R. L. & Pastorino, G. & Penchaszadeh, P. E. 2000: 140 |