Cilunculus mergus, Bamber, Roger N., 2004
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.157770 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4402048B-1028-489A-BAC9-A9CE8C475B0D |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5694666 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DA87F7-6C7C-5521-1B2A-F934FD6F7B7A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cilunculus mergus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Cilunculus mergus View in CoL sp. nov. ( Figs 5–6 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 )
Material: Solomon Islands: 1 female, holotype (MNHNPy 1041), station CP1781, N/ O 'Alis' Campagne SALOMON 1, 08º31.2'S 160º37.7'E, 1036–1138 m, 29/09/2001; coll. Bouchet, Dayat, Warén, RicherIRD.
Description of female: trunk ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 A, B) completely segmented with raised posterior margins of segments; lateral processes and trunk without tubercles or other setae. Ocular tubercle conspicuous, domeshaped, with slightlypigmented eyes (in alcohol); two small anterodorsal cephalon tubercles (horns) above chelifores. Abdomen fusiform, not articulating at base, with pair of middorsal setae longer than abdomen. Proboscis elongate barrelshaped.
Chelifores of two articles, naked, short, one third length of cephalon; chelae atrophied.
Palp ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 C) of nine articles, second article longest, third article onethird length of fourth; sixth article nearly twice length of fifth and seventh; ninth article almost as long as fourth, more than twice length of eighth article. Distal five articles with rows of short ventral setae, fourth article with dorsal row of short spines.
Oviger ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 A, B) of ten articles, article 2 longest, article 4 threequarters of article 2 and just shorter than article 5; compound oviger spines on distal four articles numbering 5:3:1:3.
Third leg ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 C, D) first coxa half as long as second coxa and 0.83 times as long as third coxa, all three naked; femur with pair of middorsal sinuous setae twice as long as femur diameter, and longer central and shorter pair of dorsodistal setae. First tibia 1.25 times length of femur, second tibia 1.1 times length of first tibia; first tibia with two dorsal pairs of long setae, paired dorsodistal spines; second tibia dorsodistally with two low swellings each distal of a single spine, ventral margin finely setose. Tarsus compact, with finely setose ventral margin and ventrodistal spine. Propodus without prominent heel, but with four heel spines, one larger subdistal and numerous shorter sole spines; dorsal margin with swelling in proximal third and stout middorsal seta; main claw half length of propodus, auxiliary claw one third length of main claw.
Eggs present in second coxa and femur. Male unknown.
Measurements of female (mm): trunk length (anterior of cephalon to tip of 4th lateral process) 3.04; length of cephalon 0.88; width across 2nd lateral processes 1.85; proboscis length 2.27; abdomen length 1.0; chelifore length 0.38; palp article 2 (P2) 1.04, P3 0.17, P4 0.57, P8 0.21, P9 0.53; third leg, first coxa 0.38, second coxa 0.77, third coxa 0.46, femur 2.42, first tibia 3.08, second tibia 3.4, tarsus 0.15, propodus 1.12, main claw 0.55, auxiliary claw 0.17; oviger article 2 ( O 2) 0.51, O 4 0.37, O 5 0.44.
Etymology: From the Latin merga, a twopronged fork, referring to the pair of prominent setae on the abdomen, mirrored on the femur and first tibia.
Remarks: The present species most closely resembles Cilunculus scaurus Stock, 1997 , recorded from New Caledonia at a similar depth; that species is named for the conspicuous “hump” proximodorsally on the propodus. Such a swelling is also present in C. mergus sp. nov., as are further swellings distally on tibia 2 which do not occur in Stock’s species. A number of differences between these two includes the spiniferous tubercles on the lateral processes and first coxae of C. scaurus (absent in C. mergus ), and the elongate distal palp article, compound spines on the seventh oviger article, and the long paired setae on abdomen and first tibia in the present species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |