Pediobius tetratomus ( Thomson, 1878 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.375759 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A463357-EEE2-4A70-BCB2-573052DB48CC |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5694650 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DA87F7-3B57-FFAA-FF05-FBE2FD9AFEE7 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pediobius tetratomus ( Thomson, 1878 ) |
status |
|
34. Pediobius tetratomus ( Thomson, 1878) View in CoL
( Fig. 31 View FIGURE 31 )
Pleurotropis (Rhopalotus) tetratomus Thomson, 1878: 257 View in CoL ; ♀. Lectotype ♀, LUZN, not examined; designated by Hansson 1991: 35.
Pediobius tetratomus ( Thomson, 1878) View in CoL , Graham, 1963: 200.
Diagnosis. Antenna with four funicular segments and clava one-segmented; four funicular segments freely separated by narrow petioles ( Fig. 31 View FIGURE 31 d). Mesoscutum and scutellum coarsely reticulate except polished notaular depressions ( Fig. 31 View FIGURE 31 a). Notauli distinct, merging to inner margins of deep notaular depressions posteriorly. The posterior pair of mesoscutal setae situated at the inner margins of notaular depressions. Stripe between the subparallel submedian carinae of propodeum raised anteriorly; submedian area impressed along posterior margin ( Fig. 31 View FIGURE 31 a).
Material examined. China, Guangxi: 1♀, Guilin, Xingan , the National Reserve of Maoershan , VI.2013, coll. Kan Wang ; Hubei: 1♀, Badong , 12.VIII.1989, coll. Da-Wei Huang ; Shandong: 1♀, Linyi, Lanling, Bianzhuanzhen , Xizhifangshan , 10.IX.2013, coll. Xue-Jun Yang ; Yunnan: 1♀, Lijiang, Yulong, Ludian , VIII.1984, coll. Chang-Fang Li . Determined specimens compared ( BMNH): 1♀, BurnhamBeaches , Bucks. England, 04.X.1975, coll. Bouček, det. Bouček.
Biology. Unknown.
Distribution in China. Guangxi, Hubei, Yunnan, Shandong.
Remarks. Newly recorded from China. If only consider the formula of antenna (4-segmented funicle, Figs 23 View FIGURE 23 e–f, 31d) and the deep notaular depressions ( Figs 23 View FIGURE 23 a, 31a) in female, P. tetratomus seems to be closer to P. atamiensis , but they are distinctly different in sculpture on mesoscutum and scutellum and coloration of tibiae ( Figs 23 View FIGURE 23 g–i, 31f–g) (see also couplet 7 of the key). Besides the characters given in the key, P. tetratomus has fore wing with slightly infuscate area below STV ( Fig. 31 View FIGURE 31 e), whereas P. atamiensis has fore wing hyaline ( Fig. 23 View FIGURE 23 d). In the future, as more fresh material becomes available, it is necessary to study character evolution of color of tibiae and antennal formula, which will assist in understanding relationships between P. tetratomus and P. atamiensis . Both species probably belong to two species groups that are closely related. As discussed by Bouček (1965a), if ignoring the formula of antenna, P. tetratomus seems to be allied to the alcaeus -group by deep notaular depressions and the forms of propodeum and gaster (e.g., Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 a–b, 31a, 31c). However, discussions on relationships among these species require additional data to test.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Pediobius tetratomus ( Thomson, 1878 )
Cao, Huan-Xi, Salle, John La & Zhu, Chao-Dong 2017 |
Pediobius tetratomus (
Graham 1963: 200 |
Pleurotropis (Rhopalotus) tetratomus
Hansson 1991: 35 |
Thomson 1878: 257 |