Dysdera jaegeri Bellvert & Dimitrov, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.921.2429 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:02633F29-4CDF-4027-BEBF-07AD2F925B42 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10671222 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/579D5ABE-98BC-4B60-96DC-721AA2C027FE |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:579D5ABE-98BC-4B60-96DC-721AA2C027FE |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Dysdera jaegeri Bellvert & Dimitrov |
status |
sp. nov. |
Dysdera jaegeri Bellvert & Dimitrov sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:579D5ABE-98BC-4B60-96DC-721AA2C027FE
Figs 6–8 View Figs 6–8
Diagnosis
Male resembles that of Dysdera sultani Deeleman-Reinhold & Deeleman, 1988 by having the external and internal sclerites fused in a single anterior sclerite, surrounding the lateral sheet ( Fig. 7 View Figs 6–8 ), and the bent embolic division ( Figs 7–8 View Figs 6–8 ). The two species can be distinguished by (1) the short and stout lateral sheet with transparent lamellar extension in D. jaegeri sp. nov. ( Fig. 8 View Figs 6–8 ), vs thin and long single processus in D. sultani ( Deeleman-Reinhold & Deeleman 1988: figs 236–237), (2) less bent embolic division (i.e., ca 60°) in D. jaegeri , vs ca 80° in D. sultani , (3) the apical part of the embolic division is a whole plate in D. jaegeri ( Figs 6, 8 View Figs 6–8 ), while in D. sultani it is sulcate apically, and (4) the posterior apophysis in D. jaegeri is more or less straight, perpendicular to the tegulum ( Figs 6, 8 View Figs 6–8 ), vs long and more bent towards the tegulum in D. sultani ( Deeleman-Reinhold & Deeleman 1988: fig. 236).
Etymology
This species is named after our colleague and reputed German arachnologist Peter Jäger.
Type material
Holotype
SYRIA • 1 ♂; Homs Province, west of Homs, ruins and abandoned cemetery NW of the castle; 18 Mar. 1973; R. Kinzelbach leg.; SMF.
Description
Male ( Figs 6–8 View Figs 6–8 )
PROSOMA. 3.13 long; maximum width 2.32; minimum width 1.61. Reddish, uniformly; with small dark grains mainly in frontal part; frontally covered with small white setae. Frontal border roughly round, ca ½ of carapace length; anterior lateral borders parallel; rounded at maximum dorsal width, back lateral borders rounded; back margin narrow, bilobulated. Eye diameters: AME 0.17; PLE 0.15; PME 0.14; AMEs on edge of frontal border, separated from one another by ca ½ diameter, close to PLEs; PMEs very close to one another, ca ⅓ of PME diameter from PLEs. Labium trapezoid-shaped, base wider than distal part; as long as wide at base; semicircular groove at tip. Sternum orange-red, frontally darker, becoming lighter posteriorly; smooth; uniformly covered with slender black setae.
CHELICERAE. 1.13 long, ca ⅓ of carapace length in dorsal view; fang medium-sized, 0.88 long; paturon dorsal and ventral side completely covered with piligerous granulations. Cheliceral inner groove short, ca ⅓ of cheliceral length; armed with three teeth and lamina at base; B> M>D; D triangular, located roughly at centre of groove; B close to basal lamina; M close to B.
LEGS. Anterior legs orange, posterior legs yellow. Lengths of leg segments: fe1 2.36; pa1 1.49; ti1 1.87; me1 2.06; ta1 0.58; total 8.36; fe2 2.14; pa2 1.38; ti2 1.68; me2 1.95; ta2 0.56; total 7.72; fe3 1.65; pa3 0.94; ti3 1.00; me3 1.45; ta3 0.51; total 5.59; fe4 2.04; pa4 1.48; ti4 1.46; me4 1.97; ta4 0.62; total 7.58; fe Pdp 1.50; pa Pdp 0.88; ti Pdp 0.57; ta Pdp 0.91; total 3.86; leg formula: 1>2> 4>3. Leg2 spineless. Fe3d spineless; pa3 spineless; tb3d spines arranged in two bands; proximal 1.0.0-1; medial-proximal 0; medial-distal 0; distal 1.0.1; tb3v spines arranged in two bands; proximal 1-2.0.0; medial-proximal 0; medial-distal 0; distal 1-0.0.0; with one terminal spine on forward margin. Fe4d spines in two rows; forward 1; backward 2; pa4 spineless; tb4d spines arranged in two bands; proximal 1.0.1; medial-proximal 0; medial-distal 0; distal 0.0.1; tb4v spines arranged in two bands; proximal 1.1.0; medial-proximal 0; medial-distal 0; distal 0-1.0.0; with one terminal spine at the distal border. Dorsal side of frontal legs smooth; ventral side of pedipalp smooth. Claws with 8 teeth or less; hardly larger than claw width.
OPISTHOSOMA. 3.87 long; cream-colored; cylindrical. Abdominal dorsal setae 0.04 long; thin, almost straight, pointed; uniformly and thickly distributed.
PALP ( Figs 6–8 View Figs 6–8 ). T slightly longer than ED; external distal border straight, internal projected at middle. ED bent ca 60 degrees in lateral view, internal distal border markedly expanded. IS and ES completely fused, forming a single anterior sclerite ( Fig. 7 View Figs 6–8 ). ED tip straight in lateral view. C present, short and poorly developed, located in distal end on ED internal tip, proximal border of C continuously decreasing. LF absent. L well developed, anteriorly not projected with a spine-like basal projection. External border poorly sclerotized, forming a transparent ridge between spine-like apophysis and distal part, not folded.AL present, well developed; proximal border in posterior view smooth, not fused with distal haematodocha. P short, fused to T; lateral length of P from ⅖ to ½ of T width; ridge present, perpendicular to T; distinctly expanded, rounded, upper margin smooth; distally ridge-like expanded; posterior margin not folded.
Female
Unknown.
Distribution
Known only from the type locality in Homs Province, central Syria.
Remarks
Dysdera jaegeri sp. nov. along with D. argaeica Nosek, 1905 , D. sultani , D. galinae Dimitrov, 2018 and D. yozgat Deeleman-Reinhold, 1988 form a complex of species within the diverse asiatica group that can be characterized by the long cylindrical T, entirely fused IS and ES, and the sclerotized processus-like lateral sheet. This complex is distributed in Turkey and Syria. Unfortunately, we were unable to sequence any of these species and their position in the Dysderinae tree remains unclear.
R |
Departamento de Geologia, Universidad de Chile |
SMF |
Forschungsinstitut und Natur-Museum Senckenberg |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |