Chilelimnophila (Chilelimnophila) parva Krzemiński, Kania-Kłosok, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlae119 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FDBA28F-5A6E-4AEE-8532-1E6C20F50C72 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14545068 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03DA5F0D-FFE0-FFE8-FF7F-AAC9E5216BA2 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Chilelimnophila (Chilelimnophila) parva Krzemiński, Kania-Kłosok |
status |
sp. nov. |
Chilelimnophila (Chilelimnophila) parva Krzemiński, Kania-Kłosok et Arillo, sp. nov.
( Fig. 4A–E View Figure 4 )
Zoobank registration: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:8B72FF8DEA83-4A2F-9085-7F5892A658BD
Diagnosis: Tip of vein R 1 approximately at fork of R 2 + 3+4; sc-r situated before tip of Sc, approximately two times the distance from the tip of Sc; gonocoxite very elongate, approximately 4× as long as wide, widened in 0.3× of its length and folded to the internal part of hypopygium; outer gonostylus narrow, slightly sclerotized, elongate, longer than half the length of gonocoxite, slightly curved to the internal part of hypopygium; inner gonostylus short and massive, round at apex, shorter than half the length of outer gonostylus, slightly curved to the internal part of hypopygium.
Material examined: Holotype No. MP/4509 (male), coll. Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland (ISEA PAS). Specimen well preserved. GoogleMaps
Horizon and locality: Lowermost Cenomanian, Hukawng Valley , northern Myanmar. The mining is done at a hill named Noije Bum, near Tanai Village (26° 21′ 33.41′′ N, 96° 43′ 11.88′′ E) GoogleMaps .
Description: Body ( Fig. 4B View Figure 4 ) 2.56 mm long, brown, wings without colour pattern, pterostigma absent.
Head: Antenna ( Fig. 4A View Figure 4 ) 1.03 mm long, longer than head, longer than palpus; scape cylindrical, slightly elongate, comparative length to pedicel; approximately 2× as long as wide, pedicel ovoid, constricted at base, first flagellomere fused with second and third; flagellomeres 4–16 elongate, tiny, approximately 2–3× as long as wide, become more slender to the apex of antenna, first flagellomere as long as wide, second and third flagellomeres rather short, fused with the first one; last flagellomere as long as penultimate one; each flagellomeres with two elongate setae, longer than segments bearing them; maxillary palpus foursegmented, short, 0.2× the length of antenna, 0.24 mm long, palpomeres rather ovoid, short, only slightly longer than wide, third palpomere comparable length to the second, all palpomeres slightly widened in the mid length; all palpomeres with few not very elongate setae, as long or shorter than segments bearing them.
Thorax ( Fig. 4B View Figure 4 ): Almost as long as high; wing 3.40 mm long, 1.13 mm wide ( Fig. 4B, E View Figure 4 ); h vein situated between the base of wing and fork of Mb and Cu; Sc ending on C before the level of bifurcation of Rs and tip of A 1; sc-r situated at approximately two of its length from the tip of Sc; Rs slightly curved, originating well proximally to the level of the tip of A 2, only slightly longer than R 2 + 3+4, R 1 reach 0.25× the length of petiole; fork of R 2 + 3+4 situated just beyond the level of d-cell, R 3 approximately 0.6× the length of R 4; R 4 longer than R 2 + 3+4, longer than Rs; section of R 5 between its origin and point of contact with crossvein r-m almost straight; vein M 3 almost straight, approximately 2× the length of d-cell; d-cell 2× as long as wide; crossvein m-cu shorter than d-cell; A 1 almost straight, tip of A 1 situated beyond fork of Mb; A 2 slightly curved; tip of A 2 just before the level of m-cu, just before the level of fork of Mb, beyond the level of fork of Rb; haltere: stem narrow, elongate, slightly longer than knob.
Abdomen: Male terminalia ( Fig. 4D View Figure 4 )—hypopygium 0.53 mm long, elongate and narrow, gonocoxite approximately 4× as long as wide, tip of gonocoxite and outer gonostylus slightly sclerotized, brown, outer gonostylus narrow, pointed, slightly curved to internal part of hypopygium, inner gonostylus rather slender but lobe-shaped.
Etymology: The specific name is derived from ‘ parva ’ (Latin)—small.
Comparison: The main differences between Recent and Cretaceous species of Chilelimnophila View in CoL are the morphology of the hypopygium ( Figs 2–4 View Figure 2 View Figure 3 View Figure 4 ) and wing venation ( Fig. 5 View Figure 5 ). In these newly described Cretaceous species, the gonocoxite is narrow and elongate, in C. (R.) amorimi subgen. et sp. nov. and C. (C.) wangi sp. nov. the coxite is approximately 3× as long as wide, in C. (C.) parva sp. nov. it is approximately 4× as long as wide, while in C. (C.) lyra View in CoL the gonocoxite is massive and wide, but relatively shorter, at most 2× as long as wide. In C. (R.) amorimi subgen. et sp. nov. the tip of the gonocoxite and outer gonostylus are strongly sclerotized, almost black, while in C. (C.) lyra View in CoL they are only slightly sclerotized and pale. In C. (C.) parva sp. nov. the gonocoxite is folded inwards in 0.3× of its length, the outer gonostylus is longer than half the length of the gonocoxite, the inner gonostylus is rounded at its apex, and shorter than half the length of outer gonostylus. In comparison, in C. (C.) wangi sp. nov. the outer gonostylus is shorter than half the length of the gonocoxite, the inner gonostylus is sharpened at the apex, longer than half the length of the outer gonostylus. Moreover, in C. (C.) lyra View in CoL vein Sc ends on C at the level of bifurcation of Rs and tip of A 1 while in C. (R.) amorimi subgen. et sp. nov. it ends before, and in C. (C.) wangi sp. nov it ends at the level of bifurcation of Rs and before the level of tip of A 1. In C. (R.) amorimi subgen. et sp. nov. and C. (C.) wangi sp. nov. the tip of A 1 is positioned even beyond half the level of the d-cell, while in C. (C.) lyra View in CoL the tip ends before its level. Position of sc-r in these three species is different also, in Cretaceous species C. (R.) amorimi subgen. et sp. nov. and C. (C.) wangi sp. nov. crossvein sc-r is situated far before the tip of Sc and before half the length of Rs, while in C. (C.) lyra View in CoL even if the position of sc-r is variable, this vein occurs more or less near the tip of Sc and the fork of Rs. Rs in C. (C.) lyra View in CoL is elongate, while in Cretaceous species it is rather short. Crossvein m-cu in C. (C.) lyra View in CoL is situated distinctly beyond half the length of the d-cell, while in newly described species m-cu occurs before half the length of the d-cell. In addition, M 1 and M 2 are quite short in C. (C.) lyra View in CoL in relation to the length of its petiole, the petiole is approximately 3× longer than M 1 or M 2, in C. (R.) amorimi subgen. et sp. nov. Cell M 1 is longer than its petiole, while the petiole and M 2 are of comparable length. In C. (C.) lyra View in CoL the basal section of R 5 between its origin and point of contact with r-m is curved, in C. (R.) amorimi subgen. et sp. nov. this is straight and perpendicular to fork of Rs, while in C. (C.) wangi sp. nov. the basal section of R 5 is slightly curved and shifted to the apex of wing, but not so far as in C. (C.) lyra View in CoL .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Limnophilinae |
Genus |
|
SubGenus |
Chilelimnophila |