AMPHINOMIDAE SAVIGNY IN LAMARCK, 1818
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/zoosystema2023v45a13 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:514F0BBF-E6AA-461D-8B31-3A646B8C1157 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8183856 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D9BD7C-FFBC-7726-FE3A-A2EAFAE3FD9D |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
AMPHINOMIDAE SAVIGNY IN LAMARCK, 1818 |
status |
|
KEY TO SUBFAMILIES OF AMPHINOMIDAE SAVIGNY IN LAMARCK, 1818 View in CoL View at ENA
REMARKS
Amphinomid subfamilies were proposed and defined by Borda et al. (2012, 2015). They were initially regarded as different clades, informally named after the body shape as fusiform vs rectangular (rectilinear). However, as indicated below, body shape changes during development and this explains why it is being regarded as an additional, non-diagnostic feature. The main difference relies in the type of branchiae, their stems, and branching pattern of branchial filaments. An additional relevant feature is the presence of cirriform branchiae along some anterior chaetigers, which is currently restricted to some archinomin genera.
1. Branchiae with single stem, branched, with filaments depressed or digitate, sometimes pinnate; single cirriform branchiae sometimes present in anterior chaetigers (body tapered or fusiform) .... Archinominae Kudenov, 1991
— Branchiae with single or double stems, with filaments digitate, never pinnate; single cirriform branchiae absent (body rectangular) ........................................................................ Amphinominae Savigny View in CoL in Lamarck, 1818
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |