Rhamphus kiesenwetteri Tournier, 1873
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5169.4.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:21750FB0-C5BC-472B-96F8-00850F1CF4C3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6959003 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D9242D-FFA6-0E71-FF12-F9658DB8FD22 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhamphus kiesenwetteri Tournier, 1873 |
status |
|
Rhamphus kiesenwetteri Tournier, 1873 View in CoL
Rhamphus kiesenwetteri Tournier, 1873: 188 View in CoL
Rhamphus kiesenwetteri View in CoL was described by Tournier (1873) based on specimens reported as collected in Sicily by the botanist brothers Huet de Pavillon, but never found subsequently on this island. Peyerimhoff (1931) pointed out that this species, which lives on Acacia View in CoL , is widely distributed in northern Africa but is a stranger to the European fauna. This author believed that there was a confusion of locality in the original description. This opinion was accepted by Pesarini and Diotti (2012) and Germann and Colonnelli (2018), mainly on the basis of the host plant. However, whereas it is certain that this species is not indigenous to Sicily ( Baviera and Caldara 2020), it remains possible that a plant with immature stages, or R. kiesenwetteri View in CoL itself, could have been transported from Africa to Sicilian gardens, where many species of Acacia View in CoL have been present for many years ( Bazan et al. 2005) and where the brothers Huet de Pavillon could perhaps have collected them during travels in Calabria and Sicily as reported by Tournier (1873). It is noteworthy that until a few years ago, the recently described Sicilian taxon R. bavierai Diotti, Caldara, Toševski, 2021 , was erroneously named R. kiesenwetteri Tournier, 1873 View in CoL (see Curculio Team 2009). At the end of his description, Tournier (1873) wrote “ Sicile: ma Collection. Je crois me rappeler l’avoir envoyée aux collection de M.M. de Kiesenwetter et Stierlin….” [I think to remember that I sent specimens to Kiesenwetter’s and Stierlin’s collections].
Currently there are no type specimens of R. kiesenwetteri View in CoL in Tournier’s collection at the MNHN (H. Perrin, pers. comm.), but we found a syntype of it ( Fig. 3C View FIGURE 3 ) in Stierlin’s collection at SDEI, already studied by Korotyaev (1994) and labelled “ Sicile [handwritten probably by Tournier]/coll. Stierlin [printed]/ Syntypus [printed on a red card] R. Kiesenwetteri Tourn. Tourn. View in CoL [sic! The repetition of the name might signify “received by Tournier”] [handwritten by Stierlin on a card with blue edges]/DEI Müncheberg Col-03390”. These labels completely correspond with the original description. We designate it as the lectotype of this taxon adding the following red card with printed text “ LECTOTYPE Rhamphus kiesenwetteri Tournier Caldara & Toševski View in CoL des.”
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Rhamphus kiesenwetteri Tournier, 1873
Caldara, Roberto, Toševski, Ivo, Mendel, Howard & Germann, Christoph 2022 |
Rhamphus kiesenwetteri Tournier, 1873: 188
Tournier, H. 1873: 188 |