Osirinus santiagoi (Almeida) Melo & Zanella, 2003
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/0022293021000007516 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10529340 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D8E20E-446A-FFAA-F403-0B25FB91A7B0 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Osirinus santiagoi (Almeida) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Osirinus santiagoi (Almeida) View in CoL , new combination
( figures 11–15 View FIGS )
Osiris santiagoi Almeida, 1996: 126 View in CoL . Holotype female, Brazil: Paraná, Jaguariaíva (DZUP; not examined).
Osiris rutilans, Shanks (1986) View in CoL : 3, 5, 6, 8, 15, 44–45 (in part).
Osirinus rutilans, Roig-Alsina (1989) View in CoL : 17, 18, 20 (in part).
Comments
This species was originally described as an Osiris . Although we examined a male and a female paratype, Almeida’s original description easily allows recognizing her species as an Osirinus : (1) head wider than long; (2) mandible with only one subapical tooth; (3) small and widely separate dorsal pronotal lobes; (4) male with pygidial plate; (5) eyes slightly converging below; (6) small body size; (7) parocular area, gena and mesepisternum with abundant plumose setae. The first four characters suggest a species of Protosiris or Osirinus , while the last three indicate an Osirinus .
The type specimens of santiagoi are from an area of ‘cerrado’ (Brazilian savannas) in the state of Paraná. The specimens we are attributing to this species also all came from areas occupied by cerrado. Most of Almeida’s specimens had a dark mesosoma (except the legs), but two of her females had a bright reddish brown mesosoma. Among the material we examined, only the male from Botucatu , São Paulo, had a dark mesosoma .
The genitalia, S7 and S8 of a male paratype are depicted in figures 11–15 View FIGS , respectively.
Material examined
Brazil, Mato Grosso: 1 female and 1 male ( MZSP) , ‘ Utiariti, Rio Papagaio, Mt ,. X.1966, Lenko & Pereira’; 1 male ( MZSP) , same data except ‘30/X/66, K. Lenko col.’. Paraná: one male paratype ( DZUP) , ‘JAGUARIAIVA (PARANA), BRASIL 5.XII.1986, LAROCA & HARADA LEG’; one female paratype ( DZUP) , same data except ‘ 6.XII.1986 ’. São Paulo: one male ( DZUP) , ‘ Rio-Claro, SP, X/1939, Pe. F. Pereira’; one male ( DZUP) , ‘CORUMBATAI SP, Brasil XI 1963, Fac. Fil. Rio Claro’; one female ( SEMK) , ‘ BRASIL, São Paulo, São Bernardo do Campo , February 1960 (W. Bokermann)’; one female ( RPSP) , ‘ 119’, ‘ Faz. Sta. Carlota , Cajuru-SP-Brasil, hs 08-10/ 18-XI-1988, S. R. M.Pedro leg, Fls 1568’ and ‘ Cerrado — Pl. 119, Rudgea vibernioides Benth. RUBIACEAE’ (plus a few additional identification labels); one male ( RPSP) , ‘ Brasil, Est. S. Paulo, 9.XI.1970, Botucatu, Veget.: Cerrado’, ‘leg. I. & G. Gottsberger, Declienxia fructicosa ’ and ‘800 ’.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Osirinus santiagoi (Almeida)
Melo, Gabriel A. R. & Zanella, Fernando C. V. 2003 |
Osiris santiagoi
ALMEIDA, M. C. 1996: 126 |
Osiris rutilans
SHANKS, S. S. 1986: 3 |