Osirinus parvicollis (Ducke)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1080/0022293021000007516 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D8E20E-4466-FFA5-F473-0966FB22A6A9 |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Osirinus parvicollis (Ducke) |
status |
|
Osirinus parvicollis (Ducke) View in CoL
( figure 16 View FIGS )
Osiris View in CoL sp., Ducke (1908): 79.
Osiris parvicollis, Ducke (1910) View in CoL : 51 (nomen nudum).
Osiris parvicollis Ducke, 1911: 105 View in CoL . Holotype female, Brazil: Ceará, Quixadá (depository
unknown). Ducke (1911): 98. Ducke (1913): 105. Friese (1930): 103, 104, 107, 110, 124–125, 127. Shanks (1986): 2, 54.
Osirinus parvicollis, Zanella (2000) View in CoL : 591.
Comments
Shanks (1986) left this species unplaced in her revision, since she was unable to locate the type specimen. Ducke’s specimen was examined by Friese when preparing his revision of Osiris , and one would assume that it might have been kept in Berlin. However, the type could not be located in the ZMHB collection (F. Koch, 1999, personal communication). Ducke’s species can be confidently placed in Osirinus based solely on his original description: (1) head, in frontal view, wider than long; (2) head surface, including clypeus, without strong punctures; (3) pronotum small, only lateral portions visible; (4) metapostnotum shiny and completetly smooth.
Ducke collected his specimen around Quixadá, a locality within the caatinga domain. The specimen we are interpreting as being conspecific with parvicollis also came from an area covered by caatinga vegetation and which is only 260 km apart from Quixadá. It was collected on flowers of Heliotropium clausseni DC (Boraginaceae) , which was also being visited by Arhysoceble huberi . Ducke also found these two species together on an unidentified Acanthaceae .
This species is very similar to rutilans , the main differences being given in the identification key. Besides those differences, the pubescence on the upper lateral portion of the mesepisternum and on the outer surface of the hind tibiae is slightly denser in rutilans than in parvicollis . The distinct colour pattern of the antenna (dark brown pedicel and flagellum, and light yellowish brown scape) seen in parvicollis might prove to be an additional difference (both antennae are missing from the type of rutilans ).
Material examined
Brazil, Rio Grande do Norte: one female ( FCVZ) , ‘ Serra Negra do Norte — RN, Estação Ecológica do Seridó , 26/II/1995, Zanella FCV Leg’ and ‘0003, 11a02 ’.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Osirinus parvicollis (Ducke)
Melo, Gabriel A. R. & Zanella, Fernando C. V. 2003 |
Osirinus parvicollis, Zanella (2000)
ZANELLA, F. C. V. 2000: 591 |
Osiris parvicollis
DUCKE, A. 1911: 105 |
Osiris parvicollis, Ducke (1910)
DUCKE, A. 1910: 51 |
Osiris
DUCKE, A. 1908: 79 |