Diplectrona Westwood, 1839
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4415.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5DAA824F-BCBD-47FF-9948-F7EC45829AEB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5966191 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D65762-3356-3F39-908B-266D9B13BACC |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Diplectrona Westwood |
status |
|
Diplectrona Westwood View in CoL
( Figs 1–48 View FIGURES 1–9 View FIGURES 10–16 View FIGURES 17–31 View FIGURES 32–48 )
Diplectrona Westwood 1839 View in CoL , 49. Type species, Diplectrona felix McLachlan 1878 View in CoL , under Plenary Powers, ICZN Decision 758 [1966]. [See Fischer (1963a, 1972) and Morse (2017) for full taxonomic literature on Diplectrona View in CoL and its included species.]
Diemeniluma Neboiss 2003 , 71. Type species, Diplectrona tasmanica Jacquemart 1965 View in CoL , by original designation. New synonym.
Diagnosis. In the Australian hydropsychid fauna, Diplectrona resembles Austropsyche and Arcyphysa gen. nov. in having fork 2 in both wings usually sessile, and in the hind wing Sc and R distally curved towards the costal margin, but is distinguished from Arcyphysa in having on the dorsal head the anterolateral setal warts undivided or incompletely divided; and from Austropsyche in having the anterolateral warts at most with an incomplete, indistinct, median suture, not fragmented posteriorly; and coxopodites of male gonopods simple, without mesal processes.
Description. Medium-sized caddisflies. Head ( Figs 17–21 View FIGURES 17–31 ) dorsally with 5 setal warts, anterolateral warts wider than long, undivided or incompletely and indistinctly divided, crowded by pair of large posterior warts. Maxillary palpi ( Figs 2 View FIGURES 1–9 , 27–28 View FIGURES 17–31 ) with segments 2 and 3 equal length, 4 slightly shorter, segment 5 exceeding length of 2+3+4. Antennae with at least distal segments bearing sutures and tufts of setae, giving crenate appearance ( Figs 25–26 View FIGURES 17–31 ). Midtibiae and tarsi not dilated. In both pairs of wings fork 2 sessile ( Figs 1 View FIGURES 1–9 , 22, 24 View FIGURES 17–31 ) or very short ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 17–31 ); forewings each with vein A1+2+3 curved, cell ac lanceolate to subtriangular; hind wings each with Sc and R with pronounced posterior curvature distally before wing margin. Abdomen with pair of filaments laterally on segment V ( Figs 30–31 View FIGURES 17–31 ), length variable; in male reticulate-walled internal sacs ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 17–31 ) spherical to elongate-ovoid. Male genitalia ( Figs 3–12, 14–16 View FIGURES 1–9 View FIGURES 10–16 , 32–43, 45–46) with midapicolateral margin of segment IX often extended into paired distinct triangular lobes (‘phallic guides’ or ‘clasper guides’ of Ross & Morse, unpublished MS); phallus with or without spines or spicules distally. Female terminal abdomen ( Figs 13 View FIGURES 10–16 , 44, 47–48 View FIGURES 32–48 ) with sternite VIII comprising two sclerites, usually separated ventromesally, produced apicolaterally, apical tubercles on segment X small.
Remarks. Continued separation of Diemeniluma from Diplectrona is unsupported. Diemeniluma was erected on the basis of rather weak features. The key characteristic of absence of anteromesal wart on the vertex of the head was erroneous as there is a small round wart between the two large, undivided anterolateral warts ( Figs 18, 19 View FIGURES 17–31 )— the arrangement of head warts in Diemeniluma closely resembles that seen in a specimen of the type species, Diplectrona felix ( Fig. 17 View FIGURES 17–31 ). The female characteristics of Diemeniluma as given by Neboiss (2003) —abdominal 'sternite VIII entire, not divided ventromesally; segment IX without lateral scleritic cavity, sternite three-lobed'— have not been confirmed in the genitalic preparation of the female identified, as that of D. tasmanica cannot be located in the NMV collection. However, a single female in ANIC, tentatively associated with a male of D. tasmanica , does show at least some slight midventral separation of sternite VIII ( Fig. 44 View FIGURES 32–48 ); the female is not known for the second species, D. serrula ( Neboiss 2003) . The nature of the triangular midapicolateral structures on segment IX of male D. inermis ( Banks 1939) , and D. spinata ( Banks 1939) (the ‘phallic guides’) becomes apparent when D. tasmanica is viewed laterally. With greater or lesser fusion of segments IX and X these become more closely associated with tergite X as in D. tasmanica (compare Figs 3, 5 View FIGURES 1–9 and 42, 43).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Diplectroninae |
Diplectrona Westwood
Wells, Alice & Contents, Arturs Neboiss Table Of 2018 |
Diemeniluma Neboiss 2003
, Neboiss 2003 |
Diplectrona tasmanica Jacquemart 1965
Jacquemart, Revised 1965 |
Diplectrona felix
McLachlan 1878 |
Diplectrona Westwood 1839
Westwood. For 1839 |
Diplectrona
Westwood. For 1839 |