Eurycorypha ligata, Hemp, 2017
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s13127-020-00452-1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D63C4C-2F70-3B33-FF59-1CA2DC51FB02 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Eurycorypha ligata |
status |
|
Eurycorypha ligata View in CoL ( Figs. 3 View Fig , 4b View Fig , 5 View Fig , 6 View Fig , 8b View Fig , and 9b, c View Fig )
The calling song of E. ligata consists of elements in which three components were combined. An element typically started with a crescendoing series of short syllables (syllable period, 44.0 ± 6.4 ms; syllable number, 5.6 ± 1.9, n = 84), immediately followed by a syllable series with similar rhythm (syllable period, 46.1 ± 5.4 ms; syllable number, 5.4 ± 1.7, n = 61; SRR, 22 Hz), but much longer syllables ( Figs. 4b View Fig and 5 View Fig ). After an interval of about 200 ms (219 ± 52; n = 71) one very long syllable (80.3 ± 12.4 ms; n = 71) was added. This last syllable often consisted of a soft short first part (opening hemisyllable?) and a loud second part (closing hemisyllable?). The first syllable series was occasionally also produced without the following two parts. Besides these elements which were answered by the females, the males produced sometimes only isolated (intervals 10 s and larger) and quite loud pairs of syllables (syllable period, 61.8.1 ± 1.4 ms; syllable duration, 20.8 ± 1.31 ms; n = 10; SRR 16 Hz) for several minutes, or groups of about five loud syllables (pairs and groups not answered by females).
The females responded typically after the third part of the element ( Fig. 6 View Fig ). However, the long syllable at the end was obviously not necessary since several duets were recorded where this part was missing. The response occurred 328 ± 27 ms (n = 55; T = 23–25.5 °C) after the end of the second part of the group (lowest coefficient of variation compared with relation to the beginning of the group or to the end of the first series). Measured from the beginning of the long syllable (if present), the delay was 118 ± 26 and 50 ± 19 ms from its end. The influence of a female response on the intensity of the male song is difficult to document. It can be seen only in situations where the female starts to respond after a long silent period (see also Heller et al. 2020). Such a case is shown in Fig. 8b View Fig . After two loud pairs of syllables, the male started with a series of elements. After the first female response, it reduced its song intensity abruptly by about 14 dB, still sufficient to elicit a response, and continued with this reduced intensity, receiving responses.
In acoustical male-male interactions (without females), the first male produced regular sequences of syllable groups (60 and 150 s recorded), the second in one case series of ticks without clear relation to song of the first. In another case (to another male), the ticks of the second were timed similarly as female responses in 65% of the cases (13:20) ( Fig. 9 View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.