Pedesta masuriensis cuneomaculata Murayama, 1995

Chiba, Hideyuki, Tsukiyama, Hiroshi, Liang, Jia-Yuan, Wang, Shou-Ming, Shen, Zong-Yu & Hsu, Yu-Feng, 2020, The types of skippers described by Shu-Iti Murayama (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae), Zootaxa 4801 (2), pp. 280-290 : 283

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4801.2.4

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:00A1A2A5-25B1-4D0E-9311-A77274F72278

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4332705

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D58377-FFB9-FF83-C6D4-FB6BFC52A688

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Pedesta masuriensis cuneomaculata Murayama, 1995
status

 

Pedesta masuriensis cuneomaculata Murayama, 1995

Nature & Insects 30(14): 33.

Labels : “ Yunnan Province (in Chinese character)/Dokanmura (= Tuguancun, in Chinese character)/ 24-V-1995 / S MURAYAMA,” “ Pedesta masuri-/ensis/cuneoma/culata/ HOLOTYPE.”

A male specimen was designated as the holotype by Murayama (1995), and the specimen was retrieved in LBM ( Figs. 25–27 View FIGURES 19–36 ; Dried Insect Database Reg. no. 1500022032).

Huang (2011) treated cuneomaculata as a junior subjective synonym of Thoressa masuriensis tali (Swinhoe, 1912) . We agree that cuneomaculata is a synonym of tali . The nominate subspecies masuriensis Moore, 1878 and subspecies tali are significantly different in appearance ( Figs. 46–49 View FIGURES 46–51 ), but Evans (1949) considered them as conspecific. However, masuriensis ( Figs. 46–47, 50 View FIGURES 46–51 ) and tali ( Figs. 48–49, 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ) are two different species, supported by distinctions in genitalia ( Figs. 50–51 View FIGURES 46–51 ) and the genetic divergence of COI barcode between them (12–13%, Table 1). They may be separated by the following features: 1) uncus bent with blunt tips in masuriensis ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 46–51 ) versus straight with narrowed tips in tali ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ); 2) left harpe with inner one of terminal processes as small lobe in masuriensis ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 46–51 ) versus produced serrate teeth in tali ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ); 3) phallus short and stout in masuriensis ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 46–51 ) versus elongate and slender in tali ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ). Those masuriensis molecular samples in China ( Li et al. 2019) all belong to tali .

Huang (2011) was correct in merging the Chinese taxa of Thoressa Swinhoe, 1913 and Pedesta Hemming, 1934 . His taxonomic treatment, however, was not complete because he did not include the type species of Thoressa . The genus Thoressa sensu Evans (1949) was polyphyletic and is now divided into three genera based on molecular evidences ( Huang et al. 2019). Those species assigned to Thoressa by Huang (2011) indeed should be included in Pedesta . Therefore, Pedesta tali comb. nov. is the valid name for this taxon.

LBM

Lake Biwa Museum

COI

University of Coimbra Botany Department

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Lepidoptera

Family

Hesperiidae

Genus

Pedesta

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF