Pedesta masuriensis cuneomaculata Murayama, 1995
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4801.2.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:00A1A2A5-25B1-4D0E-9311-A77274F72278 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4332705 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D58377-FFB9-FF83-C6D4-FB6BFC52A688 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Pedesta masuriensis cuneomaculata Murayama, 1995 |
status |
|
Pedesta masuriensis cuneomaculata Murayama, 1995
Nature & Insects 30(14): 33.
Labels : “ Yunnan Province (in Chinese character)/Dokanmura (= Tuguancun, in Chinese character)/ 24-V-1995 / S MURAYAMA,” “ Pedesta masuri-/ensis/cuneoma/culata/ HOLOTYPE.”
A male specimen was designated as the holotype by Murayama (1995), and the specimen was retrieved in LBM ( Figs. 25–27 View FIGURES 19–36 ; Dried Insect Database Reg. no. 1500022032).
Huang (2011) treated cuneomaculata as a junior subjective synonym of Thoressa masuriensis tali (Swinhoe, 1912) . We agree that cuneomaculata is a synonym of tali . The nominate subspecies masuriensis Moore, 1878 and subspecies tali are significantly different in appearance ( Figs. 46–49 View FIGURES 46–51 ), but Evans (1949) considered them as conspecific. However, masuriensis ( Figs. 46–47, 50 View FIGURES 46–51 ) and tali ( Figs. 48–49, 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ) are two different species, supported by distinctions in genitalia ( Figs. 50–51 View FIGURES 46–51 ) and the genetic divergence of COI barcode between them (12–13%, Table 1). They may be separated by the following features: 1) uncus bent with blunt tips in masuriensis ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 46–51 ) versus straight with narrowed tips in tali ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ); 2) left harpe with inner one of terminal processes as small lobe in masuriensis ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 46–51 ) versus produced serrate teeth in tali ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ); 3) phallus short and stout in masuriensis ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 46–51 ) versus elongate and slender in tali ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 46–51 ). Those masuriensis molecular samples in China ( Li et al. 2019) all belong to tali .
Huang (2011) was correct in merging the Chinese taxa of Thoressa Swinhoe, 1913 and Pedesta Hemming, 1934 . His taxonomic treatment, however, was not complete because he did not include the type species of Thoressa . The genus Thoressa sensu Evans (1949) was polyphyletic and is now divided into three genera based on molecular evidences ( Huang et al. 2019). Those species assigned to Thoressa by Huang (2011) indeed should be included in Pedesta . Therefore, Pedesta tali comb. nov. is the valid name for this taxon.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |