Cyphacolus jenningsi Valerio, Masneri & Austin
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.276183 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6210273 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D40C35-FFDB-FFC1-98DA-D229001CAED8 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cyphacolus jenningsi Valerio, Masneri & Austin |
status |
sp. nov. |
Cyphacolus jenningsi Valerio, Masneri & Austin , new species
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:087A1CEC-06D2-4788-B041-ABAAFF64880E urn:lsid:biosci.ohio-state.edu:osuc_concepts: 240843
Figures 54–59; Morphbank39
Description. Female. Body length: 1.85 mm (n=1).
Antenna color: antennal A1–A5 honey yellow, remainder of antenna dark brown. Body color: mostly honey yellow except posterior ¼ of mesoscutum, metasomal horn on T1 and T2–T7 dark brown. Coxae color: honey yellow. Leg color (excluding the coxae): honey yellow. Fore wing color: basal 1/3 and area at 2/5 hyaline, area below stigma infuscate as well as area beyond basal 1/3.
Head shape in lateral view: broad, short. Sculpture of antennal scrobe: smooth. Shape of torular triangle: not bulging, flat. Development of central keel on frons: completely absent. Sculpture of frons: largely smooth, with sparse setigerous punctulae. Sculpture of malar space: with fan-like striae extending onto antennal scrobe. Medial surface of vertex: flat to weakly convex (normal). Size of lateral ocellus: small (as in C. bouceki ). Distance between lateral ocellus and occipital carina:> 1.5x maximum ocellar width. Length of OOL: ≤1/3 width of ocellus. Sculpture of vertex: largely smooth, with sparse, setigerous punctulae. Surface of occiput: evenly concave (normal). Sculpture of occipital carina: strongly crenulate throughout. Proximity of occipital carina to orbital carina: well separated by distance at least 2x width of occipital carina. Shape of occipital carina: strongly sinuate medially, M-shaped. Sculpture of occiput: with sinuate, curved, longitudinal sculpture.
Sculpture of pronotal cervical area: transversely costate. Sculpture of pronotal lateral area: longitudinally costate. Netrion: absent, obscured by longitudinal sculpture on lateral pronotum. Notauli: present, simple. Width of notauli: narrow. Length of notauli: approximately 0.5x length of mesoscutum. Sculpture of mesoscutum: largely smooth, with sparse, setigerous punctures. Sculpture of mesoscutellum: smooth, foveae of submarginal sulcus subequal in size. Mesoscutellum shape: flat, conspicuously wider than long. Sculpture of lateral propodeum: densely, transversely costate. Shape of propodeal anterior spines: short, narrow, apex rounded. Sculpture of propodeum between anterior spines: with strong, oblique ridges laterally. Sculpture of ventral mesepisternum: largely smooth, with sparse, setigerous punctulae. Density of longitudinal costae on dorsal mesepisternum: sparse. Thickness of longitudinal costae on dorsal mesepisternum: thin. Length of longitudinal costae on dorsal mesepisternum: reaching to meso-metapleural suture. Sculpture of mesopleural femoral depression: smooth. Sculpture of metapleuron: with weak to well-defined longitudinal costae throughout.
Shape of wings: very convex in lateral view, with a conspicuous constriction at 2/5 of its length.
Shape of horn on T1 (in posterior view): narrow and short. Lateral carinae on posterior part of horn: absent. Sculpture of upper portion of T1 horn: smooth. Sculpture of posterior portion of T1 horn: with welldefined longitudinal carinae. Lateral carinae on T2: absent. Sculpture of T2: largely finely costate, costae longer near midline, posterior margin smooth, lateral margin with setigerous punctulae. Sculpture of T3: anterior 1/4 densely, weakly coriaceous, posterior 1/4 smooth, otherwise with fine, dense costae. Sculpture of S3–S6: with broad, well-developed costae throughout.
Male. Unknown.
Diagnosis. This species can be easily identified from all other species by the very conspicuously bent down and M shaped mid-dorsal area of the occipital carina, the presence of notauli, and having a flat mesoscutellum.
39. http://www.morphbank.net/?id=514193 Etymology. This species is named after our close colleague John Jennings from The University of Adelaide.
Link to distribution map. 40
Material examined. Holotype female: AUSTRALIA: SA, Waite Arboretum, Urrbrae, 27.III–10.IV.1996, OSUC 237890 (deposited in SAMA).
FIGURES 54–59. Cyphacolus jenningsi n. sp., holotype female ( OSUC 237890). 54, Dorsal habitus; 55, Lateral habitus; 56, Mesosoma , dorsal view; 57, mesosoma , lateral view; 58, head, anterior view; 59, metasoma, dorsal view. Morphbank41
40. http://osuc.biosci.ohio-state.edu/HymOnline/map-large.html?id= 240843 41. http://www.morphbank.net/?id=514193
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |