Cyphacolus diazae Valerio, Masner & Austin
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.276183 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6210269 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D40C35-FFD7-FFCD-98DA-D22C01B0AED8 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Cyphacolus diazae Valerio, Masner & Austin |
status |
sp. nov. |
Cyphacolus diazae Valerio, Masner & Austin , new species
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:A86117CC-4B3F-4E71-AC2A-A7F2DC4E844D urn:lsid:biosci.ohio-state.edu:osuc_concepts: 240833
Figures 42–47; Morphbank33
Description. Female. Body length: 1.43 mm (n=1).
Antenna color: antennal A1 yellow, remainder of antenna dark brown. Body color: mostly honey yellow, metasoma dark brown. Coxae color: honey yellow. Leg color (excluding the coxae): light yellow. Fore wing color: area below and after stigma infuscate, remainder of wing hyaline.
Head shape in lateral view: broad, short. Sculpture of antennal scrobe: upper half with semicircular fine ridges, otherwise smooth. Shape of torular triangle: not bulging, flat. Development of central keel on frons: completely absent. Sculpture of frons: largely smooth, with sparse setigerous punctulae. Sculpture of malar space: with fan-like striae, striae not extending into antennal scrobe. Medial surface of vertex: flat to weakly convex (normal). Size of lateral ocellus: small (as in C. bouceki ). Distance between lateral ocellus and occipital carina: 0.5–1.2x maximum ocellar width. Length of OOL: ≥ 1x width of ocellus. Sculpture of vertex: coriaceous. Surface of occiput: evenly concave (normal). Sculpture of occipital carina: strongly crenulate throughout. Proximity of occipital carina to orbital carina: well separated by distance at least 2x width of occipital carina. Shape of occipital carina: simply arcuate medially. Sculpture of occiput: with conspicuous longitudinal ridges throughout.
Sculpture of pronotal cervical area: smooth medially, otherwise with elongated foveae. Sculpture of pronotal lateral area: foveate throughout. Netrion: absent, obscured by longitudinal sculpture on lateral pronotum. Notauli: absent. Sculpture of mesoscutum: largely smooth, with sparse setigerous punctures, posterior margin with short, longitudinal striae, these shorter medially. Sculpture of mesoscutellum: mainly smooth except for granulate sculpture at anterior and lateral edge, posterior edge with dense and small foveate sculpture. Mesoscutellum shape: flat, conspicuously wider than long. Sculpture of lateral propodeum: sparsely, transversely costate. Shape of propodeal anterior spines: short, broad, apex rounded. Sculpture of propodeum between anterior spines: smooth. Sculpture of ventral mesepisternum: coriaceous. Density of longitudinal costae on dorsal mesepisternum: sparse. Thickness of longitudinal costae on dorsal mesepisternum: broad. Length of longitudinal costae on dorsal mesepisternum: reaching to meso-metapleural suture. Sculpture of mesopleural femoral depression: weakly, longitudinally foveate. Sculpture of metapleuron: largely smooth, ventral region with 2–3 longitudinal carinae.
Shape of wings: very convex in lateral view, with a conspicuous constriction at 2/5 of its length.
Shape of horn on T1 (in posterior view): narrow and short. Lateral carinae on posterior part of horn: present, rounded, not fused posteriorly. Sculpture of upper portion of T1 horn: smooth. Sculpture of posterior portion of T1 horn: smooth. Lateral carinae on T2: present, poorly developed. Sculpture of T2: largely finely costate, smooth along posterior margin and midline. Sculpture of T3: anterior 2/3 with sparse weak longitudinal carinae, midline and remainder smooth. Sculpture of S3–S6: mainly smooth, with sparse setigerous punctulae.
Male. Unknown.
Diagnosis. This species can be identified from all other species by the absence of notauli, and having a flat mesoscutellum and a very cristate and ornamented occipital carina dorsally.
32. http://osuc.biosci.ohio-state.edu/HymOnline/map-large.html?id= 240834 33. http://www.morphbank.net/?id=514191
Etymology. We are pleased to name this species after Jessica Diaz (wife of the first author); Thanks for the amazing Chicken liver pate!
Link to distribution map. 34
Material examined. Holotype female: KENYA: Nyanza Prov., Lake Victoria, 0.615°S 34.092°E, 1145m, 17.VII–26.VII.1998, malaise trap, S. Miller, OSUC 237891 (deposited in NMKE).
FIGURES 42–47. Cyphacolus diazae n. sp., holotype female ( OSUC 237891). 42, Dorsal habitus; 43, Lateral habitus; 44, Mesosoma , dorsal view; 45, Mesosoma , lateral view; 46, Head, anterior view; 47, Metasoma, dorsal view. Morphbank35
34. http://osuc.biosci.ohio-state.edu/HymOnline/map-large.html?id= 240833
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |