Tanycarpa areolata Yao
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3957.2.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2E504E16-E93E-463B-B032-BAC253966297 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6103063 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D387D8-5330-BF19-FF54-FC07FA8A2557 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Tanycarpa areolata Yao |
status |
sp. nov. |
Tanycarpa areolata Yao , sp. nov.
( Figs. 23–30 View FIGURES 23 – 26 View FIGURES 27 – 30 )
Type material. Holotype: ♀ China, Ningxia: Liupanshan, Ningxia, 17–VIII–2001, Qinge Ji ( FAFU). Paratypes: 1 ♂ China, Ningxia: Liupanshan, Jingyuan, 19–VIII–2001, Zhihui Lin; 1 ♂ same data except Longtan, Linfang, 15– VIII–2001 ( FAFU).
Diagnosis. Eye 1.70× longer than temple length in dorsal view ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 23 – 26 ); temple width less than head width ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 23 – 26 ); face with pubescence, somewhat convex, 1.00× wider than high ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 23 – 26 ); vertex with densely short pubescence ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 23 – 26 ); mandible 2.30× longer than wide ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 23 – 26 ); female mesoscutum with dense pubescence ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 27 – 30 ), male mesoscutum not as dense as in females, setiferous laterally; scutellar disc strongly convex, smooth and setiferous ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 27 – 30 ); T1 1.90× longer than apical width, apical width 1.88× longer than basal width ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 27 – 30 ); ovipositor sheath 0.40× metasoma length, 1.40× longer than T1 ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 27 – 30 ).
Female ( Figs. 23–30 View FIGURES 23 – 26 View FIGURES 27 – 30 ). Head. Antenna with 20 flagellomeres, 1st flagellomere 1.50× longer than 2nd, 1st and 2nd flagellomeres 4.00× and 2.70× longer than their widths, respectively ( Fig. 24 View FIGURES 23 – 26 ); eye glabrous, 1.70× longer than temple length in dorsal view; temple width less than head width ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 23 – 26 ); frons almost flat, pubescent; occipital tubercles completely absent; face with pubescence, somewhat convex, 1.00× wider than high; vertex with dense short pubescence ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 23 – 26 ); anterior tentorial pits medium-sized, deep; clypeus convex, punctulate; apical margin of clypeus straight; head 1.95× wider than medial height ( Fig. 23 View FIGURES 23 – 26 ); mandible slightly expanded dorsally, dorsal margin upcurved, almost parallel, 2.30× longer than wide, 3rd tooth large, rounded, margin between 1st tooth and 2nd tooth nearly orthogonal, 2nd tooth 1.50× longer than wide, pointed, 1st tooth smaller than 3rd tooth, with shallow incision between 1st and 2nd tooth ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 23 – 26 ).
Mesosoma . 1.27× longer than high; propleuron smooth ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 23 – 26 ); mesoscutum 0.80× longer than wide ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 27 – 30 ); notauli distinctly crenulate basally, obliterated posteriorly ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 27 – 30 ); midpit short and elliptical; mesoscutum with dense pubescence ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 27 – 30 ); scutellar sulcus deep and wide with 1 weak longitudinal carina ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 27 – 30 ); subalar area almost smooth, with transverse and shallow smooth depression anteriorly, crenulate ventrally; precoxal sulcus shallow and as long curved line ( Fig. 26 View FIGURES 23 – 26 ); scutellar disc strongly convex, smooth and setiferous ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 27 – 30 ); propodeum with longitudinal ridge in basal 1/4, then diverging into 2 oblique transverse ridges forming large areola with dense pubescence ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 27 – 30 ).
Wings. Pterostigma linear, r arising from basal 1/4; 3RSb slightly sinuate; 1cu-a small, postfurcal; 1CU1:1CU2=1:5–1:8; 1st subdiscal cell closed; r:3RSa:3RSb:2RS:r-m=4:21:68:19:11; 2nd submarginal cell 1.70× longer than wide; 2CUb arising just below middle of 1st subdiscal cell ( Fig. 28 View FIGURES 27 – 30 ).
Legs. Hind leg almost smooth; tarsal claws slender, simple, and large; femur, tibia, and basitarsus of hind leg 5.00×, 9.50×, and 7.00× longer than wide, respectively.
Metasoma. T1 1.90× longer than apical width, apical width 1.88× wider than basal width, apical part medially protruding, longitudinally rugose in apical 1/3; spiracles small, not protruding ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 27 – 30 ); dorsal carinae developed, not converging; laterope medium-sized and narrow; ovipositor sheath 0.40× longer than metasoma, 1.40× longer than T1, 0.73× length of hind tibia ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 27 – 30 ).
Color and size. Body reddish brown; mandible yellow, tooth 2 reddish apically; antenna brown; legs yellow and smooth; pterostigma light brown; metasoma reddish brown; antenna length 2.60 mm, body length 2.60 mm.
Male. Head. Head 2.33–2.56× wider than high; antenna with 21–24 flagellomeres; eye 1.20–1.30× longer than temple length in dorsal view.
Mesosoma . 1.55× longer than high; mesoscutum 0.86× longer than wide; precoxal sulcus deep, short, wider posteriorly than anteriorly, crenulate and somewhat curving up posteriorly; mesoscutum medial lobe with sparse pubescence, lateral lobes almost entirely glabrous.
Wings. 3RSb straight; 1cu-a small, interstitial; r short and wide, as long as width of pterostigma; 2nd submarginal cell 1.55–1.75× longer than wide; 2CUb arising below middle of 1st subdiscal cell; 2CUa:2cu-a=2:1.
Metasoma. T1 2.20× longer than apical width, apical width 1.30–1.60× longer than basal width.
Etymology. This species is named after the very distinctive propodeal areola.
Distribution. China (Ningxia).
Remarks. Tanycarpa areolata is most similar morphologically to T. chors , particularly the vertex with dense short white pubescence. The two species are differentiated from one another in the remarks for T. chors .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |