Hydrophilus rufocinctus ( Bedel, 1891 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5546.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DC15F8C2-A0D4-47BB-9024-3416ED560E03 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D2DC7C-7D7E-DE1A-02F7-FE669D13FC9A |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hydrophilus rufocinctus ( Bedel, 1891 ) |
status |
|
Hydrophilus rufocinctus ( Bedel, 1891) View in CoL
Stethoxus (s. str.) rufo –cinctus Bedel, 1891: 309; Régimbart 1902a: 205.
Hydrous (Pagipherus) rufocinctus : Kuwert 1893: 90.
Hydrophilus rufocinctus View in CoL : Satô 1972b: 50; Hansen 1999a: 232; Hebauer 2002a: 27; Hansen 2004: 55; Biswas & Mukhopadhyay 1995: 160; Khan & Ghosh 2001: 72; Biswas 2002: 74; Fikáček et al. 2015c: 52; Anamika et al. 2021: 185; Przewoźny 2022: 20.
Type locality: India, Uttar Pradesh [«Hindoustan» (Nord)], Moradabad .
Distribution in India: Andhra Pradesh, Bihar (Lobar Lake), Maharashtra, Sikkim, Uttar Pradesh (Moradabad), and
West Bengal (Kolkata, Sunderban).
Global distribution: India and Pakistan.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hydrophilus rufocinctus ( Bedel, 1891 )
Gupta, Devanshu, Sonali, Shipra, Ghosh, Sujit Kumar, Das, Priyanka, Jaiswal, Deepa & Chandra, Kailash 2024 |
Hydrophilus rufocinctus
Przewozny, M. 2022: 20 |
Anamika, V. K. & Meena, S. & Lata, R. K. 2021: 185 |
Fikacek, M. & Angus, R. B. & Gentili, E. & Jia, F. - L. & Minoshima, Y. N. & Prokin, A. & Przewozny, M. & Ryndevich, S. K. 2015: 52 |
Hansen, M. 2004: 55 |
Hebauer, F. 2002: 27 |
Biswas, S. 2002: 74 |
Khan, R. A. & Ghosh, L. K. 2001: 72 |
Hansen, M. 1999: 232 |
Biswas, S. & Mukhopadhyay, P. 1995: 160 |
Sato, M. 1972: 50 |
Hydrous (Pagipherus) rufocinctus
Kuwert, A. 1893: 90 |
Stethoxus (s. str.) rufo
Regimbart, M. 1902: 205 |
Bedel, L. 1891: 309 |