Spatholobus discolor
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.489.3.3 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D1E13B-C90E-BE37-A1F6-FB1AC7F5FD0F |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Spatholobus discolor |
status |
|
Identity of Spatholobus discolor View in CoL
Spatholobus discolor View in CoL was published by Wei (1985) based on one flowering gathering (De-Ding Tao 91, KUN) from Lüchun Hsien, Yunnan Province, China. But no more specimens were ever found since the species was described, which results in the lack of fruit description in literature ( Ridder-Numan 1992, Wei 1994, Li & Wang 2006, Chen et al. 2010). We examined the holotype (KUN1208115, Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ) and found that this species was recorded by the collector to be common in open shrubs vegetation, which seems to be inconsistent with its rare records of specimens. Though the holotype was flowering, the collector recorded the species has brown winged fruits ( Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ). Furthermore, we traced two isotypes of the name, which are currently placed under the genus Craspedolobium View in CoL . One isotype (KUN0623267) has many unopen flowers and was identified as “ Spatholobus roxburghii var. denudatus Baker View in CoL ” by Heng-Chang Wang in 2001 and as “ Craspedolobium schochii View in CoL ” by Bo Pan in 2014, while the other (HITBC0011543, Fig. 2B, 2D View FIGURE 2 ) has some immature fruits densely covered with brown tomentose hairs and was determinated as “ Craspedolobium schochii Harms View in CoL ” by Chong-Jiang Zhao in 2004. It is clear that both isotypes were not examined by the author of the scientific name. Besides, we traced one fruiting gathering that collected at the same locality on same collection date by the same collector as holotype (De-Ding Tao 117, Fig. 2C, 2E View FIGURE 2 ). This fruit gathering appears to be similar with the type specimens of Spatholobus discolor View in CoL in the habitat and many characters, but it has brown tomentose, winged pods, which is consistent with the records in the holotype. This fruit collection was correctly identified as “ Craspedolobium schochii View in CoL ” ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ). Therefore, observations of previous authors on these important specimens including its types showed that Spatholobus discolor View in CoL is likely conspecific with Craspedolobium unijugum View in CoL .
The genus Spatholobus View in CoL comprises about 29 or 30 species distributed in Southeast Asia ( Ridder-Numan 1992, Schrire 2005, Chen et al. 2010). Morphologically, Spatholobus View in CoL is consistent with Craspedolobium View in CoL in many morphological characters, including the woody scandent habit, trifoliolate leaves, persistent stipels, pseudopanicles, and diadelphous stamens. However, these two genera are quite different in the number of ovules and position of the seeds in the fruit ( Geesink 1984, Lôc 1998). Spatholobus View in CoL has 2 (very rarely 3–4) ovules per ovary and samaroid pods with only one seed located at a narrower apical part, while Craspedolobium View in CoL has 5–8 ovules and marginally winged pods with several seeds scattered along the upper suture ( Geesink 1984). In the revision of the monotypic genus Craspedolobium, Lôc (1998) View in CoL pointed out seven important characteristic features of this taxon, including trifoliolate leaves with asymmetric lateral leaflets, axillary and terminal pseudoracemes, calyx lobes with hairs on both sides, diadelphous stamens, 5–8 ovules per ovary, flat and dehiscent pod with the winged suture, and 2–5 seeds per pod. Furthermore, the observations on specimens and living plants showed that Craspedolobium View in CoL has branchlets with numerous lenticels, the upper surface of leaflets often turning black when dry, a minute tip of leaflet, the longest calyx lobe forming a cover in bud, and a relatively long beak at the apex of the pod ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ), which are also five very useful features for recognizing this taxon, especially when the materials lacking ripe fruits. In fact, we found all these features except for the ripe fruit character in the type specimens of Spatholobus discolor View in CoL ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ). Additionally, results from the examination of literature also showed that there are no clear differences between Spatholobus discolor View in CoL and Craspedolobium unijugum View in CoL ( Table 1). Therefore, it could be concluded that Spatholobus discolor View in CoL is identical with Craspedolobium unijugum View in CoL , and the former name should be treated as a new synonym of the latter.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Spatholobus discolor
Song, Zhuqiu, Yao, Gang, Jiang, Kaiwen, Liao, Junjie & Xu, Dongxian 2021 |
Craspedolobium, Lôc (1998)
, Loc 1998 |
Craspedolobium
, Loc 1998 |
Craspedolobium
, Harms 1921 |
Craspedolobium
, Harms 1921 |
Craspedolobium
, Harms 1921 |
Spatholobus
Hasskarl 1842 |
Spatholobus
Hasskarl 1842 |
Spatholobus
Hasskarl 1842 |