Carpomya
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4144.1.2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F1A6E9DE-2CF3-4C4E-8E7F-29F44476CE15 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6086590 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D087C8-4310-9D38-5FB3-F897FED1FE3C |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Carpomya |
status |
|
Carpomya View in CoL View at ENA group of genera
Norrbom (1997) ran a cladistic analysis of the species of Carpomya , Myiopardalis , and Goniglossum that were available at the time of his publication, plus tica , his newly-described species that he assigned to Carpomya , but here is placed in a new genus. I consider all these species, as well as the new species of Goniglossum , as constituting a monophyletic group within the Carpomyina , equivalent to Carpomya sensu Norrbom , and here informally named the Carpomya group of genera.
As conceived here, the six species comprising the Carpomya group of genera are all Old-World species, while tica is a New-World taxon. Most of the remaining genera listed under Carpomyina are strictly New-World taxa, whereas Rhagoletis , the largest genus in the subtribe (with 73 species out of a total of 112), occurs in both hemispheres.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.