Lumahyphes cocal, Boldrini, R., Santos, G. C. & Oliveira, D. R., 2015
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4013.1.11 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AEBD115A-CBF2-43BF-9821-778B978EB524 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6094393 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03D00503-FFF4-CA67-2EA0-FE91FE296043 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Lumahyphes cocal |
status |
sp. nov. |
Lumahyphes cocal sp. nov.
( Figs. 1–7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 )
Diagnosis. Male imago: 1) vein CuP of fore wing with basal portion attached to vein A ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 7 a,b); 2) terga base color whitish and terga I–X washed with gray, in whole or part ( Figs. 1–2 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ); 3) dorsal structure of penes apically rounded ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ); 4) spines of penes long, S-shaped in lateral view ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ); 5) spines of penes with apex directed anteriorly ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ).
Description. Male imago. Antenna: 0.4 mm; body: 2.4–2.9 mm; fore wing: 2.8–2.9 mm; hind wing: 0.4–0.5 mm; tibia I: 0.8 mm; tibia II: 0.6 mm; tibia III: 0.7 mm; cerci broken and missing.
Head ( Figs. 1, 2 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Dark grey dorsally, grey ventrally; compound eyes blackish; ocelli whitish, surrounded with blackish; antenna whitish and washed with gray.
Thorax ( Figs. 1, 2 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Pronotum whitish washed with gray. Meso- and metanotum brown; prelateroscutum and scutellum washed with gray; medioscutum, submedioscutum, sublateroscutum and posterior scutal protuberance darker. Prosternum whitish and washed with light gray. Meso- and metasternum brown; basisternum darker. Legs yellowish light-brown, foreleg darker; coxa and trochanter brown; apex of femur with black mark on dorsal region ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ); base of tibia brown. Fore wing membrane greyish ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ); basal portion of vein CuP attached to vein A ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 7 b); costal and subcostal regions gray. Hind wing membrane greyish ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ).
Abdomen ( Figs. 1, 2 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Basal color whitish. Terga I–III & VIII–X washed with gray completely; terga IV–VII with only median region washed with gray. Sterna I–VI washed with gray; sternum IX washed with light brown.
Genitalia ( Figs. 5, 6, 7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Median projections of styliger plate short and pointed distally ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ); accessory dorsal structure of penes rounded ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Forceps whitish; segment I 0.75× length of segment II; segment I washed with light brown. Penes whitish; spines washed with light brown; spines of penes S-curved in lateral view; apex of spines anteriorly directed ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Bases of cerci whitish.
Etymology. The specific epithet of the new species is an allusion to the locality where the holotype was collected: Igarapé Cocal , Amajarí, Roraima.
Distribution. BRAZIL: Roraima.
Comments. Lumahyphes cocal sp. nov. shares most of the characteristics found in the diagnosis for the genus made by Domínguez et al. (2006). The only generic characterisitic that is not found in this new species is that vein CuP of the fore wing does not retains its basal portion paralleling CuA. In this new species, the basal portion of vein CuP on fore wing is attached to A ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ), as found in the genera Traverhyphes Molineri, 2001 and Vacupernius Wiersema & McCafferty, 2000 .
In the key by Dominguez et al. (2006), L. cocal sp. nov. would key as L. guacra or L. yagua . However, adults of these three species can be distinguished easily by the genitalia. Lumahyphes cocal sp. nov. has the accessory dorsal structure of penes and median projections of styliger plate not curved ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ); the spines of the penes are relatively long, S-curved in lateral view, and with anteriorly directed apices ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 1 – 7 ). Lumahyphes guacra and L. yagua , on the other hand, have the dorsal structure and the inner posterolateral projection of styliger plate curved (as in Dominguez et al. 2006: Figs. 100 F, L), and the spines of the penes have a different shape in lateral view.
Material examined. Holotype: Male imago, Brazil, Roraima, Amajari, Serra do Tepequém, Igarapé Cocal , 3°73'N, 61°72'W, 18.xii.2014, Boldrini, R., Barroso, P.C.S., Oliveira, D.R. and Borges, R.L. leg. ( INPA). Paratypes: Two male imagos, same data as holotype ( INPA); four male imagos, same data as holotype, except, 01.xi.2014, Boldrini, R., Boldrini, B.M.P.O., Barroso, P.C.S. and Santos, G.C. leg ( CZNC); two male imagos (legs, wings and genitalia mounted on slides), same data as holotype, except, 01.xi.2014, Boldrini, R., Boldrini, B.M.P.O., Barroso, P.C.S. and Santos, G.C. leg ( UFRR); two male imagos, Brazil, Roraima, Pacaraima, Igarapé Samã, 4°28'30.8''N, 61°09'44.4''W, 06.i.2015, Boldrini, R. leg. ( UFRR).
INPA |
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |