Australonura limnophila ( Cassagnau & Rapoport, 1962 ) Palacios-Vargas & Deharveng, 2014

Palacios-Vargas, José G. & Deharveng, Louis, 2014, First record of the genus Australonura Cassagnau 1980 (Collembola: Neanuridae) in the New World, with description of a new species from Paraguay, Zootaxa 3779 (1), pp. 33-47 : 35-39

publication ID	https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3779.1.6
publication LSID	lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BF81CC3C-4F1F-471F-B90A-B4E9A4F033AF
DOI	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5056463
persistent identifier	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF879C-BD11-FF88-2192-FB9FFB1FF815
treatment provided by	Felipe
scientific name	Australonura limnophila ( Cassagnau & Rapoport, 1962 )
status	comb. nov.

Treatment

Australonura limnophila ( Cassagnau & Rapoport, 1962) comb. nov.

( Figs 2–10 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURES 3–7 View FIGURES 8–10 )

Neanura limnophila Cassagnau & Rapoport, 1962

Paleonura limnophila ( Cassagnau& Oliveira, 1990)

Type material examined. Holotype (male) and two female paratypes on slide from Cassagnau collection: Argentina: Chubut Province: near Lago Futulaufquen , 15/03/59, Delamare-Deboutteville leg (ARG-Pat063); deposited in MNHN. Eight paratypes (1 male, 7 females) on slides from Cassagnau collection: ibid: near Lago Menéndez, 16/03/59, Delamare-Deboutteville leg (ARG-Pat104); deposited in MNHN (one male, six females) and UNAM (1 female).

Other material examined. Specimens of three other populations were listed by Cassagnau & Rapoport (1962). One population (ARG-Pat025 from Lago Frías) was subsequently separated as a new species, A. friasica , described in Cassagnau & Oliveira 1990. The other two populations are listed as other material, not as types, in Cassagnau & Oliveira (1990). One of them (ARG-Pat047 from Isla Victoria) corresponds to A. limnophila . The other one (ARG-Pat111 of Lago Lacar) differs from both A. limnophila and A. friasica , and is probably a new species. Another population from Lago Frías (station ARG-Pat045) was represented by four specimens on slide in the Cassagnau collection, but not cited in his publications; they can be assigned to A. limnophila . It remains finally two samples in the Cassagnau collection that correspond to A. limnophila ; in addition, two recent samples of D’Haese are also A. limnophila ; all four samples were taken about 180 km North of the type locality ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ).

Four specimens (two males, two females) on slides. Argentina: Neuquen Province: Villa la Angostura : near Lago Nahuel Huapi: Isla Victoria, dead wood, 03/03/59, Delamare-Deboutteville leg (ARG-Pat047). Deposited in MNHN (1 male, two females) and UNAM (1 male).

One male on slide. Argentina: Neuquen Province: Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi: los Arrayanes, Northern part of Quetrihué peninsula, under barks of rotten logs, aspirator sampling, 29/10/05, D'Haese leg (A142). Deposited in MNHN.

Four specimens (two males, one female and one juvenile) on slides. Argentina: Rio Negro Province: near Lago Frías, 07/03/59, Delamare-Deboutteville leg (ARG-Pat045). Deposited in MNHN.

One female on slide. Argentina: Rio Negro Province: Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi: Puerto Blest, 12/11/05, D'Haese leg (A190). Deposited in MNHN.

Redescription. Length: from 0.78–1.73 mm (all specimens, N=18). Females larger than males; specimens from the type locality are larger, while non-type specimens exhibit a wider range of size: females (types): 1.13– 1.73 mm (N=8); males (types): 1.18–1.47 (N=2); females (non-types): 0.78–1.47 (N=4); males (non-types): 0.88– 1.45 mm (N=4).

Habitus similar to Paleonura sp. ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ). Colour white in ethanol. Secondary granulation regular, constituted of rounded granules, equal to or less than a mac socket in diameter ( Figs 6 View FIGURES 3–7 and 8 View FIGURES 8–10 ). No reticulations. Dorsal chaetal groups on weakly differentiated tubercles; tubercles absent or faint on Th. I; tubercles Di and De of Th. II–Abd. III and Di of Abd. IV feebly indicated; DL and L of Th. II–Abd. IV and head tubercles moderately differentiated; tubercles De of Abd. IV and tubercles of Abd. V and VI stronger, with distinct elementary tubercles ( Figs 6 View FIGURES 3–7 and 8 View FIGURES 8–10 ). Elementary tubercles faint to well differentiated, marked by stronger secondary granules, without or with low integument boss, not grouped on papilla. Two kinds of ordinary chaetae on tergites: (i) thick mac, straight, slightly tapering, with blunt tips, smooth or, for some of them (mostly laterally and on Abd. VI), very sparsely serrated when carefully examined, the dorsal ones slightly sheathed and feebly tapering, the lateral ones not distinctly sheathed and more distinctly tapering; (ii) smooth mes of similar morphology, often bent and more tapering distally. Tergite S-chaetae thin and long, thinner and subequal or slightly shorter than closest large mac ( Figs 2 View FIGURE 2 and 8 View FIGURES 8–10 ).

Antennae ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 3–7 ). All antennal chaetae smooth. Ant. I with seven chaetae, Ant. II with eleven chaetae, the dorsal ones thicker and longer than ventral ones. Ant. III sensorial organ with two thick, bent ms slightly buried in a cuticular fold; guard S thinner than S1-S8 of Ant. IV, with Sgv straight and 30% longer than Sgd; and one ventral ms. Ant. IV with S1-8, 12 long “mou” chaetae, one short ordinary chaeta (i), one small subapical organ; apical bulb indistinct flat, entire, fused to Ant. IV tip.

Ocelli 2 + 2 without pigment, located on the edges of tubercle Oc ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 3–7 ). Mandibles thin, bidentate; maxilla heads styliform. Labium long with four basal chaetae (E,F,G,f) with F very long), three distal chaetae (A,C,D) with one minute x-papilla, and three lateral chaetae (c,d,e) ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 3–7 ). Labrum elongate, large and rounded apically, with planaria-head-like ventral sclerifications ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 3–7 ); labral formula 0/2,4.

Dorsal head chaetotaxy and tubercles ( Table 1A View TABLE 1 , Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 , 6 and 7 View FIGURES 3–7 ). Eleven tubercles in total: CL, Af, 2 Oc, (Di+Di), 2 De, 2 DL, 2 (L+So). Ten chaetae on tubercle Af, chaeta O absent. Three chaetae present in ocular tubercle including Ocp. Dorso-internal tubercles of the head fused on axis, with four elementary tubercles often inconspicuous anterior to the line Di1–Di1 and none posteriorly. On lateral area of head, mac L1 displaced towards tubercle DL ( Fig. 7 View FIGURES 3–7 ).

Postcephalic chaetotaxy and tubercles ( Table 1B View TABLE 1 , Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 and Fig. 8 View FIGURES 8–10 ). Chaetae Di1, 2, 3 almost on a line parallel to the axis on Th. II–III. Chaetae Di2 anterior to Di1 on Abd. I–IV. Chaetal group Di of Abd. IV shifted anteriorly to De. On the tubercle Di of Abd. V, the anterior mes are possibly homologous to Di3 rather than Di2, being more distant than Di1 mac.

Legs ( Table 1B View TABLE 1 and Fig.9 View FIGURES 8–10 ). Ventral mac of the femur moderately differentiated, slightly longer than ventral side of femur. Tita without tenent hairs, without chaeta M and with chaetae B4 and B5 moderately elongate. Pretarsal mic relatively long. Unguis without tooth.

Microchaetae of furcal rest either present ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 8–10 ) or undetectable. Male genital plate with 4+4 genital and 7– 12 circumgenital chaetae; female genital plate with 1+1 genital and 11–14 circumgenital chaetae.

Vi: 5 chaetae; Ve: 8–9 chaetae

* Lateral chaetal group of Abd. V located ventrally without individualized tubercle, probably including one chaeta VL.

Discussion. Australonura limnophila was described from specimens of various locations in Southern Argentina, all located at the southern limit of the Valdivian temperate forest ecoregion ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ).

In the original description of the species, the clypeal tubercle is fused with the antenno-frontal; these tubercles are in fact separate on the type specimens we have examined, in agreement with Cassagnau & Oliveira (1990) who already corrected this mistake. Tubercles Di of the head are fused to each other on axis ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ). It is this character, together with separation of Di and De and the presence of a well-differentiated antenno-frontal tubercle on head, that led us to assign Neanura limnophila to the genus Australonura . However, the uneven dorso-internal cephalic tubercle is very faint, without clearly recognizable elementary tubercles.

From the specimens listed in the original description of Cassagnau & Rapoport (1962), some were isolated subsequently in a new species, A. friasica ( Cassagnau & Oliveira 1990) . A closer examination leads us to consider the specimens of Lago Lacar area as another new species, which is briefly characterized below.

Head chaetae group	Tubercles	Number of chaetae	Type of chaetae	Chaetae
CL	+	4	2M 2m	F G
Af	+	10	4M 6m	A, B C, D, E
Oc	+	3	1m 2M	Oca Ocm, Ocp
Di+Di	+	2	2M	Di1
De	+	3	1M 2m	De1 Di2, De2
DL+L1	+	5	3M 2m	DL1, DL5, L1 DL3, DL4
L+So	+	7	2M 5m	L4, So1 L2, So3–6