Dissomphalus gordus, Azevedo, 2003
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.338.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7146D5AC-DE68-4CB7-B004-3B85A46C69B4 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5101998 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CF0539-AA67-FFBB-FEF4-F9CAFC36FA2E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Dissomphalus gordus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Dissomphalus gordus sp. nov. ( Figs. 82–87 View FIGURES 72–87 )
Description. — Male. Body length 4.5 mm; LFW 3.12 mm. Color: head and mesosoma black; metasoma, clypeus, mandible and antennae dark castaneous, scape lighter; legs castaneous; palpi light castaneous; wings subhyaline.
Head: mandible bidentate ( Fig. 82 View FIGURES 72–87 ). Clypeus trapezoidal ( Fig. 83 View FIGURES 72–87 ). First four antennal segments in a ratio of 13:5:5:6, segment XI 1.43 X as long as broad, sensillae conspicuous. Frons strongly coriaceous, punctures inconspicuous, shallow, separated by 0.3–1.5 X their diameters. LH 0.98 X WH; WF 0.61 X WH; 1.38 X HE; OOL 1.14 X WOT; DAO 0.36 X WOT; posterior ocelli distant from the vertex crest 1.2 X DAO, frontal angle of ocellar triangle acute. Vertex straight, corners rounded. VOL 0.48 X HE.
Mesosoma: thorax coriaceous as frons. Pronotal disc 0.64 X length of mesoscutum. Propodeal disc 0.67 X as long as wide, with small polished area posteriorly. Fore femur 3.3 X as long as thick.
Metasoma: tergite II with pair of elliptical pits, distant each other 5.0 X their length, distant from posterior margin of tergite I 0.67 X their length, closer to the lateral margin than the middle, placed at the inner area of rounded depression, inner part of each pit covered by translucid sclerite ( Fig. 84 View FIGURES 72–87 ), so that the hole is hemispheric and inclined, from which emerges small tuft of hairs ( Fig. 85 View FIGURES 72–87 ). Hypopygium with median stalk 1.43 X as long as plate, posterior margin straight. Genitalia ( Fig. 86–87 View FIGURES 72–87 ): paramere wider medially, with apex as a triangular expansion, dorsal margin convex, ventral margin straight; aedeagus entirely gibbous, ventral ramus much shorter than dorsal body, laminar, surface inclined, basal half fused, apical half narrowing gradually to the rounded apex in lateral view; dorsal body with two pairs of apical lobes, outer pair laminar apically, surface vertical, apex rounded in lateral view, with rim hairy below, inner pair membranous, stout and hairy; basal process as a stout expansion, large and somewhat membranous, basal bar dilated above; apodeme not extending beyond the elliptical genital ring.
Material examined. — HOLOTYPE: male, BRAZIL, Paraná, Antonina, Reserva Sapitanduva , 29.IX.1987; Malaise trap, Profaupar Survey ( DZUP) . PARATYPES: BRAZIL, Rio de Janeiro, 4 males , Rio de Janeiro, I.1972, M. Alvarenga col. ( PMAE) ; São Paulo, 1 male, São Carlos, Canchim Farm , forest, 7.XI.1985, sweeping, A. Souza col. ( DCBU) ; 2 males, Salesopólis, Boraceia Biological Station , 5.VII–6.IX.1997, Malaise trap, C. I. Yamamoto col. ( MSZP) ; Paraná, 3 males, Antonina, Reserva Sapitanduva , 4.VIII.1986 – 14.IX.1987, 1 male, Colombo, Embrapa, Br 476. Km 20, 3.XI.1986 – 23.II.1987, Malaise trap, Profaupar Survey ( DZUP) .
Variation. — Metasoma darker, depression of tergal processes deeper.
Etymology. — The specific epithet refers to the aedeagus gibbous.
Distribution. — Brazil (Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Paraná).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |