Laemophloeus macrognathus Reitter
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5175873 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0FD07DE9-C339-4AAF-A405-A61CEAE56D5E |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CED713-FFDA-157A-FF1E-7FE785BAEAB6 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Laemophloeus macrognathus Reitter |
status |
|
Laemophloeus macrognathus Reitter
Fig. 11 View Figure 11 , 40-47 View Figures 40-46 View Figures 47-49
Laemophloeus macrognathus Reitter 1876: 48
Types. Reitter (1876) wrote that the type was deposited at “Mus. Steinheil,” presumably that of E. W. Steinheil, whose collection passed to Rene Oberthür, so it should be in Paris (Horn and Kahle 1935-1937). In fact, Grouvelle (1881) illustrated and redescribed L. macrognathus apparently from Reitter’s specimen which was in Oberthür’s collection at that time. However, Azadeh Taghavian (in litt.) checked the MNHN collection and reported, “I found only the label in the bottom of the box but without any specimens.”
Diagnosis. Length, 1.8-2.4 mm. The following combination of character states should distinguish this species: Antennal club composed of more than six antennomeres; antennomere XI elongate ( Fig. 11 View Figure 11 ); elytra testaceous with base and suture broadly infuscate ( Fig. 11 View Figure 11 ); mandibles in large males almost equal in length to head ( Fig. 11 View Figure 11 ); head without a median excavation on the frons ( Fig. 40 View Figures 40-46 ); eyes large and coarsely faceted ( Fig. 41 View Figures 40-46 ); male genitalia as in Fig. 43-45 View Figures 40-46 , basal plates linear and angulate.
Distribution. Central and South America. Described from “Columbia, Medellin.” ( Reitter 1876: 48).
Specimens examined. 20, from the following localities: BRAZIL: Rondonia: 62km SW Ariquemes, Fzda. Rancho Grande ; PANAMA: Barro Colorado Island ; TRINIDAD: Simla, Arima-Blanchisseuse Rd .; St. George Co. Simla, Arima Valley ; Arima Valley “Simla” Beebe Trop. Res. Center. Deposited in FSCA .
Discussion. This is one of the most distinctive species of Laemophloeus . The coloration, the elongation of the gena (Fig; 47), which Grouvelle (1881) compared to Prostomis Latreille (Prostomidae) , and the long mandibles in large males are unmistakable. The epistomal suture is almost completely obsolete in the male ( Fig. 40 View Figures 40-46 ), but obsolete only on the middle third of the female ( Fig. 41 View Figures 40-46 ). This species is uncommonly collected.
FSCA |
Florida State Collection of Arthropods, The Museum of Entomology |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Laemophloeus macrognathus Reitter
Thomas, Michael C. 2013 |
Laemophloeus macrognathus
Reitter, E. 1876: 48 |