Euthria stuetzii ( Naumann, 1852 )
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5427.1.1 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:923206B0-E8C5-4FD5-B882-55009ABB0282 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/03CE9F1C-FFCB-0C13-FF65-F9FFE8AEF812 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi (2024-03-19 21:17:48, last updated 2024-03-19 21:37:23) |
|
scientific name |
Euthria stuetzii ( Naumann, 1852 ) |
| status |
|
Euthria stuetzii ( Naumann, 1852)
Figs 34I View FIGURE 34 , 44A–E View FIGURE 44
[ Fusus ] Stützii Partsch— Hauer 1837: 418 [nomen nudum].
[ Fusus ] Stützii Partsch— Hörnes 1848: 19 [nomen nudum].
* [ Fusus ] Stützii — Naumann 1852: plate captions, pl. 70, fig. 11.
Fusus Stützii Partsch — Eichwald 1853: 178.
Fusus virgineus Grat. —Hörnes 1853: 286, pl. 31, figs 10–12 [non Euthria virginea (Grateloup, 1833) ].
Fusus virgineus Gratteloup — Neugeboren 1854: 187 [non Euthria virginea (Grateloup, 1833) ].
[ Fusus ] Stützii Partsch— Naumann 1854: 1066.
Fusus virgineus Grat. — Handmann 1888: 18, pl. 2, fig. 22 [non Euthria virginea (Grateloup, 1833) ].
Fusus virgineus Grat. —Hoernes & Auinger 1890: 254, pl. 36, figs 1–7 [non Euthria virginea (Grateloup, 1833) ]. Fusus Hössii Partsch — Friedberg 1912: 158, pl. 9, fig. 6 [non Angustifusus hoessii (Hoernes & Auinger, 1890) View in CoL ]. Fusus an virgineus Grat. — Friedberg 1912: 160, text-fig. 42, pl. 9, figs 9a–b.
Euthriofusus virgineus (Grat.) View in CoL — Sieber 1937: 142 [non Euthria virginea (Grateloup, 1833) ].
Fusus an virgineus Grat. View in CoL — Friedberg 1938: 139.
Fusus (Euthriofusus) aff. virgineus Grat. — Korobkov 1955: plate captions, pl. 96, figs 14a–b.
Fusus (Fusus) hössii Partsch — Korobkov 1955: plate captions, pl. 96, figs 16a–b [non Angustifusus hoessi (Hoernes & Auinger, 1890) ].
Fusus hössi Partsch — Csepreghy-Meznerics 1956: 410, pl. 8, figs 15–16 [non Angustifusus hoessii (Hoernes & Auinger, 1890) View in CoL ].
Fusus (Euthriofusus) virgineus Grateloup 1833 —Kojumdgieva in Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960: 191, pl. 46, figs 6a–b [non Euthria virginea (Grateloup, 1833) ].
Euthriofusus View in CoL (s. s.) virgineus stutzii (Partsch) von Hauer, sp. 1837— Glibert 1963: 133.
Fusus hoessi Partsch (in Hauer et in Hörnes), (1837) 1856— Strausz 1966a: 343, pl. 26, figs 17–18 [non Angustifusus hoessii (Hoernes & Auinger, 1890) View in CoL ].
Fusus (Fusus) rostratus cinctus Bellardi — Atanacković 1969: 208, pl. 11, fig. 8 [= non Pseudofusus cinctus ( Bellardi & Michelotti, 1840) View in CoL ].
Euthriofusus virgineus (Grateloup, 1833) View in CoL — Bałuk 1995: 246, pl. 35, figs 1–5 [non Euthria virginea (Grateloup, 1833) ].
Euthriofusus (Euthriofusus) virgineus (Grateloup) View in CoL — Schultz 1998: 68, pl. 27, fig. 8 [non Euthria virginea (Grateloup, 1833) ].
Euthriofusus virgineus (Grateloup 1833) View in CoL subs. stutzii Glibert, 1963 — Snyder 1999: 6.
Fusus (Fusus) prevosti Partsch in Hoernes, 1856— Atanacković 1985: 147, pl. 33, figs 5–6 [non Ariefusus prevosti (Hörnes, 1853) View in CoL ].
Euthriofusus virgineus (Grateloup, 1833) View in CoL — Mikuž 2009: 20, pl. 5, figs 63–64 [non Euthria virginea (Grateloup, 1833) ].
Euthriofusus virgineus (Grateloup, 1833) View in CoL — Mikuž & Šoster 2014: 58, pl. 2, figs 3a–b [non Euthria virginea (Grateloup, 1833) ].
Euthriofusus virgineus (Grateloup, 1833) View in CoL — Kovács 2022: 93, figs 96–97 [non Euthria virginea (Grateloup, 1833) ].
Euthriofusus virgineus (Grateloup, 1833) View in CoL — Kovács & Vicián 2023: 254, figs 13O–Q [non Euthria virginea (Grateloup, 1833) ]. non Euthriofusus virgineus View in CoL non (Grat.) sensu Hörnes— Báldi & Kókay 1970: 279, fig. 6 [=? Angustifusus hoessii (Hoernes & Auinger, 1890) View in CoL ].
non Euthriofusus (Euthriofusus) cf. virgineus (Grateloup 1833) View in CoL — Steininger 1973: 428, pl. 7, fig. 10.
Type material. Neotype designated herein, NHMW 2023/0351/0001, SL: 76.5 mm, MD: 33.3 mm, Enzesfeld ( Austria), illustrated in Hörnes (1853: pl. 31, fig. 10), Figs 44A View FIGURE 44 1 –A View FIGURE 1 2 View FIGURE 2 . The illustrations in Naumann (1852) were provided by Paul Maria Partsch (1791–1856) and Moritz Hörnes (1815–1868) (see Naumann 1854: 1963, footnote) and were based on material from the Natural History Museum Vienna. The manuscript of Partsch with these illustrations is still preserved and the material was later published by Hörnes (1853). Nevertheless, it is not possible to identify the specimens drawn by Partsch in the collection. Therefore, we designate the specimen illustrated by Hörnes (1853: pl. 31, fig. 10) as neotype.
Illustrated material. NHMW 1999z0077/0017, SL: 78.0 mm, MD: 27.4 mm, Enzesfeld ( Austria), illustrated in Hoernes & Auinger (1890: pl. 36, fig. 6), Figs 44B View FIGURE 44 1 –B View FIGURE 1 2 View FIGURE 2 . NHMW 2023/0351/0002, SL: 74.9 mm, MD: 30.1 mm, Enzesfeld ( Austria), Figs 44C View FIGURE 44 1 –C View FIGURE 1 2 View FIGURE 2 . NHMW 2023/0351/0003, SL: 70.6 mm, MD: 28.4 mm, Enzesfeld ( Austria), Figs 44D View FIGURE 44 1 –D View FIGURE 1 2 View FIGURE 2 . NHMW 1949/0005/0025, SL: 63.8 mm, MD: 24.6 mm, Steinebrunn ( Austria), illustrated in Hoernes & Auinger (1890: pl. 36, fig. 4), Figs 44E View FIGURE 44 1 –E View FIGURE 1 2 View FIGURE 2 . NHMW 1846/0037/0254, SL: 27.4 mm, MD: 11.7 mm, Enzesfeld or Gainfarn ( Austria), Fig. 34I View FIGURE 34 .
Additional material. NHMW 2023 View Materials /0346/0002, SL: 73.1 mm , MD: 29.3 mm, Gainfarn ( Austria), illustrated in Hoernes & Auinger (1890: pl. 36, fig. 2) . NHMW 2023 View Materials /0346/0003, SL: 55.1 mm , MD: 22.3 mm, Gainfarn ( Austria), illustrated in Hörnes (1853: pl. 31, fig. 11) ; NHMW 2023 View Materials /0348/0002, SL: 29.5 mm , MD: 14.0 mm, Steinebrunn ( Austria), illustrated in Hörnes (1853: pl. 31, fig. 12) ; NHMW 2023 View Materials /0352/0001, SL: 53.2 mm , MD: 23.6 mm, Mikulov ( Czech Republic), illustrated in Hoernes & Auinger (1890: pl. 36, fig. 3) ; NHMW 1999 View Materials z0077/0016, SL: 64.2 mm , MD: 26.1 mm, Enzesfeld ( Austria), illustrated in Hoernes & Auinger (1890: pl. 36, fig. 5) ; NHMW 1999 View Materials z0077/0019, SL: 75.7 mm , MD: 30.3 mm, Forchtenau ( Austria), illustrated in Hoernes & Auinger (1890: pl. 36, fig. 7); 1 spec. , NHMW 1884 View Materials /0000/1537, Guntersdorf ( Austria), 4 spec. , NHMW 1855 View Materials /0045/0718, Grund ( Austria); 3 spec. , NHMW 1853 View Materials /0010/0025, Enzesfeld ( Austria); 13 spec. , NHMW 1846 View Materials /0037/9253, Enzesfeld ( Austria); 9 spec. , NHMW 1855 View Materials /0045/0456, Gainfarn ( Austria); 8 spec. , NHMW 1846 View Materials /0037/0253, Gainfarn ( Austria); 7 spec. , NHMW A1431 View Materials , Enzesfeld ( Austria); 4 spec. , NHMW 1853 View Materials /0010/0025, Enzesfeld ( Austria); 6 spec. , NHMW A1432 View Materials , Steinebrunn ( Austria); 13 spec. , NHMW 1869 View Materials /0001/0357, Steinebrunn ( Austria); 3 spec. , NHMW 1862 View Materials /0001/0260, Möllersdorf ( Austria); 12 spec. , 1855/0045/0106, Mikulov ( Czech Republic); 4 spec. , NHMW 1863 View Materials /0015/0966, Hrušovany nad Jevišovkou ( Czech Republic) .
Revised description. Large, slender fusiform shell of up to eight teleoconch whorls; apical angle 42–48°. Protoconch paucispiral, high conical of 1.75 whorls; diameter: 850 μm, height: 920 μm. Early teleoconch whorls with rounded axial ribs, overrun by five prominent spiral cords; narrow subsutural collar composed of two adapical spirals; secondary cords intercalated on second teleoconch whorl. Later spire whorls with narrow subsutural collar, weakly concave subsutural ramp, rounded at shoulder placed mid-whorl, bearing broad axial ribs separated by narrower interspace, most prominent along periphery, fading over subsutural ramp, overrun by numerous broad primary and secondary spiral cords, weakening on later whorls, often subobsolete on last whorl. Blunt or pointed tubercles may be developed at shoulder in some specimens. Axial ribs becoming subobsolete at variable growth stage; typically becoming weak on penultimate and last whorl; axial ribs on last whorl, if present, fold-like, weakening over base. Last whorl attaining 65–70% of total height, with relatively narrow, concave subsutural ramp delimited by rounded to weakly angled, smooth to weakly tuberculate shoulder, convex below, moderately constricted at base, fasciole weak, bearing weak spiral cords or nearly smooth.Aperture elongate, moderately narrow, pyriform, Columellar callus forming broad rim, sharply delimited from base. Columella broadly excavated, angled at transition to siphonal canal. Anal canal narrowly incised in thickened adapical tip of aperture. Outer lip thickened but thin edged. About 14–15 elongated denticles starting slightly behind peristome. Transition into siphonal canal abrupt, marked by distinct edge. Siphonal canal long, very narrow, distinctly deflected to the left, slightly recurved, shallowly notched.
Discussion. This species has traditionally been placed in Euthriofusus Cossmann, 1901 , but species of that genus are characterized by club-shaped shells with long siphonal canal and are quite unlike Euthria stuetzii ( Naumann, 1852) . Therefore, ‘ Euthriofusus ’ virgineus (Grateloup, 1833) and ‘ Euthriofusus ’ grateloupi Peyrot, 1928 , both from the Early Miocene of France, are also placed by us in Euthria (as proposed for Euthria grateloupi also by Lozouet 2021). General outline, sculpture of early teleoconch whorls and apertural features correspond fully with other Euthria species. A relatively long siphonal canal is also seen in Euthria brunettii nov. sp. and some Pliocene species such as Euthria adunca ( Bronn, 1831) and Euthria ceddensis Brunetti & Della Bella, 2016 (see Brunetti & Della Bella 2016: figs 3A, 5B). Among the extant species, Euthria effendyi Fraussen & Dharma, 2002 from Java and Euthria poppei Fraussen, 1999 from Mozambique have comparably long siphonal canals ( Fraussen 1999; Fraussen & Dharma 2002).
Hauer (1837), Hörnes (1848) and Naumann (1852) treated specimens from the Vienna Basin as Fusus stuetzii , which was a collection name introduced by Partsch. Later, Hörnes (1853) listed this name as synonym of ‘ Fusus virgineus’ [ Euthria virginea (Grateloup, 1833) ], without commenting this decision. Thus, the tradition to identify Paratethyan specimens as ‘ Euthriofusus virgineus’ goes back to Hörnes (1853) and Hoernes & Auinger (1890), who referred to illustrations in Grateloup (1845). Peyrot (1928) emphasized the low quality of the illustrations in Grateloup (1845) and excluded the Paratethyan records from Euthria virginea . Subsequently, the understanding of Euthria virginea became strongly biased by the fact that nearly all specimens identified as that species derived from the Paratethys Sea and represent Euthria stuetzii . To our knowledge, only Peyrot (1928) provided an adequate picture of Euthria virginea . This specimen from the Serravallian of Salles ( France) differs from Euthria stuetzii in its higher, slenderer spire, the prominent spiral cords on the last whorl, the prominent growth lines and the weakly excavated columella. The French species also has a wider aperture, but this may be pathological in response to a trauma seen in dorsal view (see Peyrot 1928: pl. 8, figs 7–8). Euthria anatolica ( Toula, 1901), from the Serravallian of the Karman Basin, differs in its even longer siphonal canal and more constricted base (see Landau et al. 2013 for discussion).
‘Euthriofusus’ hoernesi Peyrot, 1928 , from the Serravallian of Salles ( France), differs from Euthria stuetzii in its strongly convex spire whorls, the weakly excavated columella, the nearly straight transition from columella to siphonal canal and the even longer siphonal canal. The generic placement of the French species will also need revision, but the very long siphonal canal excludes placement in Euthria .
Euthria stuetzii ( Naumann, 1852) is highly reminiscent of the extant Euthriostoma saharicum ( Locard, 1897) from western Africa, which differs mainly in its strongly shouldered whorls, the smooth inner lip and the wider siphonal canal. Molecular data will be needed to test if Euthriostoma Marche-Marchard & Brébion 1977 [type species Euthriostoma gliberti Marche-Marchad & Brébion, 1977 = Euthriostoma saharicum ( Locard, 1897) ] might be a junior synonym of Euthria .
Paleoenvironment. Coastal marine, inner neritic; the occurrence at Gainfarn suggests the vicinity of sea grass (Zuschin et al. 2007; own data).
Distribution in Central Paratethys. Early Miocene records are based on poorly preserved shells, and we doubt that these are conspecific with the Middle Miocene species (e.g., Pfister & Wegmüller 2007: pl. 5, figs 18–19). Badenian (Middle Miocene): Korytnica Basin: Korytnica ( Poland) ( Bałuk 1995); North Alpine-Carpathian Foreland Basin: Guntersdorf ( Austria) (hoc opus), Hrušovany nad Jevišovkou ( Czech Republic) (hoc opus); Vienna Basin: Enzesfeld, Gainfarn, Steinebrunn ( Austria) (Hoernes & Auinger 1890), Mikulov ( Czech Republic) (Hoernes & Auinger 1890); Eisenstadt-Sopron Basin: Forchtenau ( Austria) (Hoernes & Auinger 1890); Pannonian Basin: Letkés, Szob, Devecser ( Hungary) ( Strausz 1966a; Kovács & Vicián 2023); Făget Basin: Lăpugiu de Sus ( Romania) ( Kovács 2022); Krško Basin: Gorenje Mokro Polje, Šentjerneja ( Slovenia) ( Mikuž 2009); Dacian Basin: Bivolare, Opanec, Staropatica, Trifonovo ( Bulgaria) (Kojumdgieva in Kojumdgieva & Strachimirov 1960).
Atanackovic, M. A. (1969) Paleontoloska i biostratigrafska analiza tortonske faune sjeveroistocnog. Potkozarja (okolina sela Turjaka i Miljevica). Acta Geologica, 6, 149 - 222.
Atanackovic, M. A. (1985) Mekusci Morskog Miocena Bosne. Geologija Bosne I Hercegovine, Fosilna Fauna i Flora, 1, 1 - 308.
Baldi, T. & Kokay, J. (1970) The fauna of the Kismaros tuffite and the age of the Borzsony andesitic volcanism. Foldtani Kozlony, 100, 274 - 283. [https: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / item / 205947 # page / 746 / mode / 1 up]
Baluk, W. (1995) Middle Miocene (Badenian) gastropods from Korytnica, Poland; Part II. Acta Geologica Polonica, 45, 153 - 255. [https: // geojournals. pgi. gov. pl / agp / article / view / 13663]
Bellardi, L. & Michelotti, G. (1840) Saggio orittographico sulla classe dei gasteropodi fossili dei terreni terziarii del Piemonte. Stamperia reale, Torino, 82 pp. [also published in 1841 as: Memorie della Reale Accademia delle Scienze di Torino, Series 2, 3, 93 - 174, pls. 2 - 9. [https: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 7619788]
Bronn, H. G. (1831) Italiens Tertiar-Gebilde und deren organische Einschlusse. Karl Groos, Heidelberg, xii + 176 pp. [https: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / item / 121009 # page / 5 / mode / 1 up 4] https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 59236
Brunetti, M. M. & Della Bella, G. (2016) Revisioni di alcuni generi della famiglia Buccinidae Rafinesque, 1815 nel Plio-Pleistocene del Bacino Mediterraneo, con descrizione di tre nuove specie. Bollettino Malacologico, 52, 3 - 37. [https: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / item / 278546 # page / 5 / mode / 1 up]
Cossmann, M. (1901) Essais de paleoconchologie comparee. Quatrieme livraison. The author and Societe d'Editions Scientifiques, Paris, 293 pp. [http: // biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 36321572]
Csepreghy-Meznerics, I. (1956) Die Molluskenfauna von Szob und Letkes. A Magyar Allami Foldtani Intezet Evkonyve, 45, 361 - 477. [https: // epa. oszk. hu / 03200 / 03274 / 00094 / pdf / EPA 03274 _ mafi _ evkonyv _ 1956 _ 02 _ 363 - 442. pdf]
Eichwald, E. (1853) Lethaia Russica ou Paleontologie de la Russie. Troisieme Vfolume. Derniere periode. Schweizerbart, Stouttgart, xix + 533 pp. [https: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / item / 112200 # page / 5 / mode / 1 up] https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 52391
Fraussen, K. (1999) A new species of Euthria from Mozambique (Mollusca Gastropoda Buccinidae). Gloria Maris, 37 (5 - 6), 71 - 76.
Fraussen, K. & Dharma, B. (2002) A new Euthria (Gastropoda: Buccinidae) (Euthria effendyi) from Java (Indonesia). Gloria Maris, 41 (4 - 5), 105 - 111.
Friedberg, W. (1912) Mieczaki Miocenskie ziem Polskich. (Mollusca Miocaenica Poloniae). Czesc I. Slimaki i Lodkonogi (Pars I. Gastropoda et Scaphopoda). Muzeum imienia Dzieduszyckich we Lwowie, 2, pp. 113 - 239, pls. 6 - 14. [https: // rcin. org. pl / dlibra / publication / 4795 / edition / 29891 / content]
Friedberg, W. (1938) Katalog mego zbioru mieczakow miocenskich Polski (Katalog meiner Sammlung der Miozanmollusken Polens). Memoires de l'Academie polonaise des sciences et des lettres, Classe des sciences mathematiques et naturelles. Serie B, Sciences naturelles, 12, 1 - 164. [http: // rcin. org. pl / ibd / dlibra / publication / 220825 / edition // 186621 / content?]
Glibert, M. (1963) Les Muricacea et Buccinacea fossiles du Cenozoique etranger des collections de l'Institut royal des Sciences naturelles de Belgique. Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique Memoire, Deuxieme Serie, 74, 1 - 179. [https: // biblio. naturalsciences. be / rbins-publications / memoirs-of-the-royal-institute-of-natural-sciences-of-belgium-secondseries / 74 - 1963 / vol- 74 - 3800216 - text. pdf]
Grateloup, J. P. - S. (1845 - 1847) n. k. In: Conchyliologie fossile des terrains tertiaires du Bassin de l'Adour (environs de Dax). 1, Univalves. Atlas. Lafargue, Bordeaux, pls. 1 + 3 + 5 + 10 + 12 - 48 and their explanatory texts (1845), pls. 2 + 4 + 11, pp. i - xx and table generale pp. 1 - 12 (1847). [https: // books. google. com / books? id = IWrnnLIIEswC]
Handmann, R. (1888) Die Neogenablagerungen des osterreichisch-ungarischen Tertiarbeckens. Aschendorff, Munster, 71 pp. [https: // sammlungen. ulb. uni-muenster. de / hd / content / pageview / 2023238]
Hauer, J. (1837) Uber das Vorkommen fossiler Thierreste im tertiaren Becken von Wien, und angehangte Vergleichung derselben mit den Uberresten derer gleichzeitigen Ablagerungen, nebst einigen nachtraglichen Bemerkungen uber das Maynzer- Becken von H. G. Bronn. Neues Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und Petrefaktenkunde, 1837, 408 - 431. [https: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / item / 44261 # page / 428 / mode / 1 up]
Hornes, M. (1848) Verzeichnis der Fossil-Reste aus 135 Fundorten des Tertiar-Beckens von Wien. Braumuller, Wien, 44 pp. [Appendix to Czjzek, J. (1849) Erlauterungen zur geognostischen Karte der Umgebungen Wiens. Braumuller, Wien 105 pp., https: // books. google. at / books? id = 1 PL 0 QAAACAAJ & printsec = frontcover & hl = de & source = gbs _ ge _ summary _ r & cad = 0 # v = onepage & q & f = false]
Kojumdgieva, E. & Strachimirov, B. (1960) Les fossiles de Bulgarie. VII. Tortonien. Academie Bulgare des Sciences, Sofia, 438 pp. [KoюмdZiiva, I. & Сtрasiмiрov, B. (1960) ФoсiЛiti нa BЪЛgaрiЯ. VII. Toрtoн. Bълgaрсka AkadiмiЯ нa нaukiti, СoфiЯ, 223 pp.]
Korobkov, I. A. (1955) Spravochnik i metodicheskoe rukovodstvo po tretichnym mollyuskam. Bryukhonogie. Gostoptekhizdat, Leningrad. 795 pp. [Koрobkov, I. A. (1955) Сpрavocнik i мitodiciсkoi рukovodсtvo po tрiticным мoллюсkaм. Bрюkoнogii. GoсtoptikiZdat, Лiнiнgрad, 795 pp.]
Kovacs, Z. (2022) Middle Miocene Buccinoidea (Neogastropoda) assemblage from the Faget Basin (Romania) in the collection of the Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest. Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica, 37 (2021), 65 - 99. https: // doi. org / 10.17111 / FragmPalHung. 2021.37.65
Kovacs, Z. & Vician, Z. (2023) Buccinoidea (Neogastropoda) assemblage from the Lower Badenian (Middle Miocene) deposits of Letkes (Hungary). Bolletino Malacologico, 59, 222 - 259. https: // doi. org / 10.53559 / BollMalacol. 2023.15
Landau, B. M., Harzhauser, M., Islamoglu, Y. & Marques da Silva, C. (2013) Systematics and palaeobiogeography of the gastropods of the Middle Miocene (Serravallian) Karaman Basin of Turkey. Cainozoic Research, 11 - 13, 3 - 576.
Locard, A. (1897 - 1898) Expeditions scientifiques du Travailleur et du Talisman pendant les annees 1880, 1881, 1882 et 1883. Mollusques testaces. Vols. 1 - 2. Masson, Paris, 516 pp., pls. 1 - 22 (1897) & 515 pp., pls. 1 - 18 (1898). [https: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 10994100]
Lozouet, P. (2021) Buccinoidea (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Neogastropoda) de l'Oligocene superieur (Chattien) du bassin de l'Adour (Sud-Ouest de la France). Cossmanniana, 22, 1 - 129.
Marche-Marchad, I. & Brebion, P. (1977) Sur un Buccinide nouveau d'affinite miocene vivant au large du Senegal. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences, Serie D, 285 (4), 339 - 342.
Mikuz, V. (2009) Miocenski polzi iz okolice Sentjerneja in drugih najdisc v Krski kotlini. Folia Biologica et Geologica, 50 / 2, 5 - 69. [http: // www. sazu. si / uploads / files / 57 dfbe 71 e 126 b 1 a 75 cebe 90 f / 420 - 122 - 0. pdf]
Mikuz, V. & Soster, A. (2014) Nekaj redkih Miocenskih polzev iz okolice Sentjerneja v Krski Kotlini. Several rare Miocene gastropods from surroundings of Sentjernej in Krka basin, Slovenia. Folia Biologica et Geologica, 55 (1), 51 - 72.
Naumann, C. F. (1852) Atlas zu C. F. Naumann's Lehrbuch der Geognosie. Zweite Halfte. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, pls. 27 - 70. [http: // reader. digitale-sammlungen. de / de / fs 1 / object / display / bsb 10284283 _ 00087. html]
Naumann, C. F. (1854) Lehrbuch der Geognosie. Zweiter Band. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig, 1246 pp. [https: // www. digitale-sammlungen. de / de / view / bsb 10284277? q = % 28 Lehrbuch + der + Geognosie % 29 & page = 6,7]
Neugeboren, J. L. (1854) Beitrage zur Kenntniss der Tertiar-Mollusken aus dem Tegelsgebilde von Ober-Lapugy. Verhandlungen und Mitteilungen des Siebenburgischen Vereins fur Naturwissenschaften zu Hermannstadt, 5, 153 - 156 + 183 - 188. [https: // www. zobodat. at / pdf / VerhMittNaturwissHermannstadt _ 5 _ 0153 - 0156. pdf]
Peyrot, A. (1928) Conchologie neogenique de l'Aquitaine. Actes de la Societe Linneenne de Bordeaux, 79, 207 - 465, pls. 5 - 14. [https: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 48879155]
Pfister, T. & Wegmuller, U. (2007) Gastropoden aus den Belpberg-Schichten (Obere Meeresmolasse, mittleres Burdigalium) bei Bern, Schweiz. 2. Teil: Tonnoidea bis Architectonicoidea. Archiv fur Molluskenkunde, 136, 151 - 209. https: // doi. org / 10.1127 / arch. moll / 0003 - 9284 / 136 / 151 - 209
Schultz, O. (1998) Tertiarfossilien Osterreichs. Goldschneck-Verlag, Weinstadt, 159 pp.
Sieber, R. (1937) Die Fasciolariidae des niederosterreichischen Miozans. Archiv fur Molluskenkunde, 69, 138 - 160. [https: // www. zobodat. at / pdf / Archiv-fuer-Molluskenkunde _ 69 _ 0138 - 0160. pdf]
Snyder, M. (1999) On the names attributed to Partsch in the family Fasciolariidae (Miocene, Central Europe). Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali, 10, 5 - 8. https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / BF 02904448
Steininger, F. (1973) Die Molluskenfaunen des Ottnangien. In: Papp, A., Rogl, F. & Senes, J. (Eds.), M 2 Ottnangien. Die Innviertler, Salgotarjaner, Bantapusztaer Schichtgruppe und die Rzehakia Formation. Chronostratigraphie und Neostratotypen, Miozan der zentralen Paratethys. Vol. 3. Veda, Bratislava, pp. 380 - 615.
Strausz, L. (1966 a) Die miozan-mediterranen Gastropoden Ungarns. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, 693 pp.
Toula, F. (1901) Eine marine Neogenfauna aus Cilicien. Jahrbuch der Kaiserlich-Koniglichen Geologischen Reichsanstalt, 51, 247 - 263. [https: // www. zobodat. at / pdf / JbGeolReichsanst _ 051 _ 0247 - 0264. pdf]
FIGURE 1. Measurements for shell morphology; AA: apical angle, SL: shell length, MD: maximum diameter, LWH: last whorl height, AH: aperture height, AL: aperture length, AW: aperture width.
FIGURE 2. Colubraria subobscura (Hoernes & Auinger, 1884). A1–A3. NHMW 1854/0035/0170, paralectotype, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania). B1–B2. NHMW 1859/0037/0018a, paralectotype, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania). C1–C3. NHMW 1865/0001/0183, paralectotype, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania). D1–D2. NHMW 1859/0037/0018b, paralectotype, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania). E1–E3. NHMW 1874/0025/0021, lectotype, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania). F1–F2. NHMW 2023/0338/0001, paralectotype, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania).
FIGURE 34.A. Euthria brunettii nov.sp., NHMW2023/0338/0007,paratype, Lăpugiu de Sus(Romania).B.Euthria walaszczyki nov. sp., NHMW 1868/0001/0223, Grund (Austria). C. Euthria depressospira Bandat, 1943, NHMW 2023/0338/0008, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania). D. Euthria diluvii (Eichwald, 1830) NHMW 1860/0001/0224b, Boršov (= Porstendorf) (Czech Republic). E. Euthria fuscocingulata (Hoernes & Auinger, 1890). NHMW 2023/0338/0011, paralectotype, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania). F. Euthria frausseni nov. sp., NHMW 2023/0338/0012, paratype, Lăpugiu de Sus (Romania). G. Euthria odiosa nov. sp. NHMW 2023/0348/0001, paratype, Steinebrunn (Austria). H. Euthria puschii (Andrzejowski, 1830), NHMW 2023/0350/0002, Bad Vöslau (Austria). I. Euthria stuetzii (Naumann, 1852), NHMW 1846/0037/0254, Enzesfeld or Gainfarn (Austria). J. Euthria subnodosa (Hoernes & Auinger, 1890), NHMW 1846/0037/0274, Steinebrunn and Gainfarn (Austria). K. Euthria yesimae nov. sp., RGM 794 572, paratype, Pınarlar Yaylası, Akpınar (Turkey).
| NHMW |
Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien |
| MD |
Museum Donaueschingen |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
Euthria stuetzii ( Naumann, 1852 )
| Harzhauser, Mathias & Landau, Bernard M. 2024 |
Euthriofusus virgineus (Grateloup, 1833)
| Kovacs, Z. & Vician, Z. 2023: 254 |
| Baldi, T. & Kokay, J. 1970: 279 |
Euthriofusus virgineus (Grateloup, 1833)
| Kovacs, Z. 2022: 93 |
Euthriofusus virgineus (Grateloup, 1833)
| Mikuz, V. & Soster, A. 2014: 58 |
Euthriofusus virgineus (Grateloup, 1833)
| Mikuz, V. 2009: 20 |
Euthriofusus virgineus (Grateloup 1833)
| Snyder, M. 1999: 6 |
Euthriofusus (Euthriofusus) virgineus (Grateloup)
| Schultz, O. 1998: 68 |
Euthriofusus virgineus (Grateloup, 1833)
| Baluk, W. 1995: 246 |
Fusus (Fusus) prevosti
| Atanackovic, M. A. 1985: 147 |
Euthriofusus (Euthriofusus) cf. virgineus (Grateloup 1833)
| Steininger, F. 1973: 428 |
Fusus (Fusus) rostratus cinctus
| Atanackovic, M. A. 1969: 208 |
Fusus hoessi
| Strausz, L. 1966: 343 |
Euthriofusus
| Glibert, M. 1963: 133 |
Fusus (Euthriofusus) virgineus Grateloup 1833
| Kojumdgieva, E. & Strachimirov, B. 1960: 191 |
Fusus hössi
| Csepreghy-Meznerics, I. 1956: 410 |
Fusus
| Friedberg, W. 1938: 139 |
Euthriofusus virgineus (Grat.)
| Sieber, R. 1937: 142 |
Fusus virgineus Grat.
| Friedberg, W. 1912: 158 |
| Friedberg, W. 1912: 160 |
Fusus virgineus Grat.
| Handmann, R. 1888: 18 |
Fusus virgineus
| Neugeboren, J. L. 1854: 187 |
Fusus
| Naumann, C. F. 1854: 1066 |
Fusus Stützii Partsch
| Eichwald, E. 1853: 178 |
Fusus
| Hornes, M. 1848: 19 |
Fusus
| Hauer, J. 1837: 418 |